Jump to content

President Donald J. Trump's Supreme Court Associate Justice Kavanaugh


Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Magox said:

Lyndsey Graham says hes going to campaign against all those in red and purple states that voted no.

 

All I can say is this is going to the streets at the ballot box,” Graham, R-S.C., said during an interview on "Fox News Sunday." “I've never campaigned against a colleague in my life. That's about to change. I'm going to go throughout this country and let people in these purple states, red states, where Trump won know what I thought, know what I think about this process.”

 

--------------------

 

All I can say is this is going to the streets at the ballot box,” Graham, R-S.C., said during an interview on "Fox News Sunday." “I've never campaigned against a colleague in my life. That's about to change. I'm going to go throughout this country and let people in these purple states, red states, where Trump won know what I thought, know what I think about this process.”

 

-------------------

 

Lyndsey has gone savage!!!  Dude is going to be a huge draw!

It’s amazing how well he’s recovering from the removal of that malignant brain tumor. :ph34r:

36 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Democrats are not going to enjoy reaping what they've sown.

No, they won’t. But we will. :w00t:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Yet in the House, Dems must have a million plus margin in order to maintain control. That is fundamentally unfair.

 

Again, I don't blame you for enjoying the fruits of the inequity. But even the house doesn't represent the will of the people.

 

There is no inequity.  There is a balance in compromise.  You're acting as though Democrats have never held a majority in any portion of government, and are forgetting that just a few scant years ago Democrats held the House, Senate, and the Presidency.

 

There is no reason, none, that California should dictate policy to the rest of the 49 states making up the Country; and that's really what you're asking for when you make the case for the popular vote being the will of the people.

 

Republicans hold 2/3 of governorships,  state senates, and state representatives.  They hold the overwhelming majority of local governments; and if you remove Californina from the map, they also have a sizable lead in the popular vote.

 

The solution for Californians, if they find the inabity to dictate policy to the overwhelming majority of citizens who don't share their culture or beliefs unpalatable, is to secede.  The solution for those who live outside of California who feel this way is to move to California and push for secession.

 

I'll gladly support you.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

They want to undo the concept of republican democracy and institute a coastal authoritarian regime by which they intend to dictate to conservatives how they must live.

 

I know you know this, but for others who might not: 

 

The particular author of that tweet is an admitted CIA cutout. He runs his stories past Langley (or did) before publishing. He's espousing the views of the corrupted elements of the USIC who are in an active shooting war against this administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

How is one representative per ~800,000 people unfair?

 

Please show your work, and use reality in your explanation. Oh, and if you want to cry about gerrymandering, please explain how the system in Illinois is fair.

 

Because liberals are right and fair and true and just and so they should just be in charge forever!!!!   ?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Because liberals are right and fair and true and just and so they should just be in charge forever!!!!   ?

 

Because 700,000 people in San Francisco voted for Maxine Waters but only 500,000 people voted for the nobody from Wyoming.  Therefore the people of Wyoming should bow to the will of Maxine Waters

Edited by /dev/null
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, /dev/null said:

 

Because 700,000 people in San Francisco voted for Maxine Waters but only 500,000 people voted for the nobody from Wyoming.  Therefore the people of Wyoming should bow to the will of Maxine Waters

Waters is from LA. The people in Sf are looney enough to vote for Harris, Pelosi, and Fineswine, but not looney enough to vote for Waters.

Edited by Wacka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

Yet in the House, Dems must have a million plus margin in order to maintain control. That is fundamentally unfair.

 

Again, I don't blame you for enjoying the fruits of the inequity. But even the house doesn't represent the will of the people.

Quit being a B word.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

Yet in the House, Dems must have a million plus margin in order to maintain control. That is fundamentally unfair.

 

Again, I don't blame you for enjoying the fruits of the inequity. But even the house doesn't represent the will of the people.

Democrats should stop whining about the electoral vote and consider offering something to the American

people besides protesting, raising taxes and demonizing whites and males.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Albwan said:

Democrats should stop whining about the electoral vote and consider offering something to the American

people besides protesting, raising taxes and demonizing whites and males.

 

Well, they still have lying, cheating, stealing, overregulation, race baiting, woman beating, and douchebaggery to offer.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Albwan said:

Democrats should stop whining about the electoral vote and consider offering something to the American

people besides protesting, raising taxes and demonizing whites and males.

 

Wait 'til they get around to demanding reparations for women...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

But only for certain women.The ones who know when to shut up. Like Murkowski. 

 

Meanwhile...

 

 

Well, if you aren't conservative, you're a liberal.  Clearly we have failed for generations.  We made retards and they trained other retards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chimp said:

Quit being a B word.

Facts are your friend.

 

The right controls every single aspect of government and they're STILL a bunch of malingerers.

 

I can't for the life of me understand why you people are so uncomfortable with success.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Facts are your friend.

 

The right controls every single aspect of government and they're STILL a bunch of malingerers.

 

I can't for the life of me understand why you people are so uncomfortable with success.

 

 

It's called winning.  I'm just commenting on you bellyaching.  You can twist it all you want but you're just being a boob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

But only for certain women.The ones who know when to shut up. Like Murkowski. 

 

Meanwhile...

 

 

The libs had a moment of clarity when they suggested their base "barrack the vote".  It was catchy and easy to follow when the progs hit the ballot box. The concern with the new buzz phrase "Swarm Vote" is that many underachieving liberal voters will be looking to cast their ballot for presidential fellatrix and current porn star Swarmy Daniels. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Facts are your friend.

 

The right controls every single aspect of government and they're STILL a bunch of malingerers.

 

I can't for the life of me understand why you people are so uncomfortable with success.

 

 

 

:o

 

7969d1354320501-what-most-friendly-state

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...