IDBillzFan Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: She did NOT pass a lie detector test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 so what did I miss?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Question: Do you think they will hold an investigation or call Judge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 I probably am not a good one to asses such a thing, but it seems that the republicans just sent a message to Kavenaugh: Stoop to their level and give an emotional plea, cause you'll get no help from us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, LABillzFan said: Everyone knows that is TH3 finding out GOP didn't have a HC plan after all.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said: Question: Do you think they will hold an investigation or call Judge? THIS IS THE INVESTIGATION. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Lol at her lawyer. She’s sleepy we gotta run hand over mic “don’t talk” ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Judge's statements were already in the record. nah. my remark was in respnse to Mitchell prodding here with regard to having a forensic interview and the fact that neither the senators she was in contact with or her own lawyers requested such. if they had any sense of wanting to find the truth, they would have requested she do one. ETA: curious why you deleted your comment Edited September 27, 2018 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, baskin said: Let's see....pretty much unimpeachable testimony....passed a lie detector test... Kavs gonna have a tough time with that FOX NEWS boy scout/altar boy interview.... She is so easily confused by this simple questioning that I find her not credible at all. Not that she is lying but that she doesn't have a handle on reality. She's obviously emotionally troubled which really undermines her credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Joe Miner said: Pretty sure he's already spoken under oath before today. Let's hear from him under cross and subject him to questioning. The guy was supposedly in the room. It's not that hard to do. He is an eyewitness supposedly. My guess is that he corroborates Kavanaugh's testimony. So let's hear from him and the very few others and be done. You can't leave the eyewitness out though. That makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And if you read it, and know anything about how poly's are administered, you realize this proves my point. You're wrong. Wrong, you say! Poppycock! Thurston Howell III is NEVER wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: nah. my remark was in respnse to Mitchell prodding here with regard to having a forensic interview and the fact that neither the senators she was in contact with or her own lawyers requested such. if they had any sense of wanting to find the truth, they would have requested she do one. I deleted my comment because I realized I made an assumption about your BOOM. My apologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, BeginnersMind said: Let's hear from him under cross and subject him to questioning. The guy was supposedly in the room. It's not that hard to do. He is an eyewitness supposedly. My guess is that he corroborates Kavanaugh's testimony. So let's hear from him and the very few others and be done. You can't leave the eyewitness out though. That makes no sense. There's no evidence. It's unfair to him to demand he speak on an issue that could be 100% fabricated. It's all conjecture and it was purposefully mishandled by the dems. This is over. There's no reason to believe her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: She is so easily confused by this simple questioning that I find her not credible at all. Not that she is lying but that she doesn't have a handle on reality. She's obviously emotionally troubled which really undermines her credibility. Agreed. She even looks like a mental patient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 31 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said: I LOLed at the dichotomy: "Yes, I released norepinephrine, epinephrine and cortisol and managed to escape" "What does exculpatory mean?" Just trying to click down that clock. Dems are hoping they can drag this out another day, then accuse the right of exposing her to this hostile environment for too long. I didn't know why I would need a lawyer ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Man... A debate between Avantii, Booker, and Harris for the 2020 dem nomination is just gearing up to be great TV. *vomits everwhere* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Lindsey Graham laying it out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, PearlHowardman said: Agreed. She even looks like a mental patient. She's that lady that if you bumped your shopping cart into hers in the grocery store, she'd freak out and go home and tell her family that she got rammed in the store by some !@#$ and that she was almost knocked over. Her family in turn would ask her if she's alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, baskin said: I could just declare myself "The Smartest Man in the Room" Your dedication to being completely and thoroughly wrong is remarkable. 6 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: She is so easily confused by this simple questioning that I find her not credible at all. Not that she is lying but that she doesn't have a handle on reality. She's obviously emotionally troubled which really undermines her credibility. Or reinforces it. Rape victims are emotionally troubled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Or reinforces it. Rape victims are emotionally troubled. Not raped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts