DC Tom Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 26 minutes ago, Hedge said: An entire article on the curriculum that has absolutely no information on the curriculum. What a load of crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 13, 2019 Share Posted August 13, 2019 GAVIN NEWSOM CAN NO LONGER SIT BACK AND ALLOW THE RED STATE MENACE TO SAP AND IMPURIFY ALL OF CALIFORNIA’S PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS: The Trump Obsession Comes for California’s Water. Tomorrow, the Golden State’s Democrat-run, veto-proof legislature returns from its summer break and is expected to quickly take up S.B. 1, the “California Environmental, Public Health, and Workers Defense Act of 2019.” It has been proposed for one reason: Donald Trump is president. Under his administration, long-standing EPA regulations and analyses, and bureaucratic (state and federal) actions, related to water have been rethought, reviewed, and relaxed. Which comes to the progressive Left as a threat: All that water-denying is now at risk. Hence the bill. Its consequence will be to preempt any possible forthcoming federal regulations that would result in people and farms (instead of, seriously, the Pacific Ocean) getting more, already available water. That might even be its purpose: For years, California’s bureaucrats, who are even more radical than Obama-era natural-resources federal regulators were, have shown great determination to deny the flow of fresh water from mountain snowpacks, watersheds, and reservoirs to the famous the Central Valley, which, when supplied H2O, puts fruits and vegetables on the world’s tables. As Jack Fowler adds at NRO, “Recommended reading: Two excellent pieces that explain just what’s going on are Victor Davis Hanson’s City Journal essay ‘California’s Water Wars,’ and Charlie Cooke’s NR report, subtitled ‘For the sake of a smelt, California farmlands lie fallow.’” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 16, 2019 Share Posted August 16, 2019 BIOSCAM: Short on cures and cash – California’s stem cell agency to ask voters for billions more. I remember when this was going to be the answer to George W. Bush’s cruel refusal to unleash the easy miracle cures that were just waiting to be deployed via embryonic stem cell research. And yet, 15 years and billions of dollars later, all they’ve produced is a demand for more cash: Californians voted in 2004 to shell out billions of dollars in taxpayer money to fund cutting-edge stem cell treatments. Proposition 71 could lead to cures for cancer, Alzheimer’s and other devastating diseases, voters were told. Actor Michael J. Fox, who has Parkinson’s disease, said in one campaign ad that the measure “could save the life of someone you love.” But 15 years later, there are no readily available cures. And the state’s stem cell agency, which administered the bond money, is about to run out of funding. Flashback: Adult Stem Cells Now the ‘Gold Standard.’ Related: MIT Technology Review: Will Embryonic Stem Cells Ever Cure Anything? “In fact, no field of biotechnology has promised more and delivered less in the way of treatments than embryonic stem cells.” In 2004, of course, we couldn’t know how the science would turn out. But that didn’t stop Fox from making a mean-spirited ad for the Democrats. And how bad must he feel, to have flushed (at least) half his fan base for John Kerry? . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted August 16, 2019 Share Posted August 16, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted August 17, 2019 Share Posted August 17, 2019 https://twitter.com/Jesus_porvida/status/1162542002484830208 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 17, 2019 Share Posted August 17, 2019 2 hours ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/Jesus_porvida/status/1162542002484830208 We see stuff like this all the time. It doesn't move the needle. Not even a little bit. Does anyone honestly believe CA politicians genuinely care about a hairdresser closing her business? Of course not. They represent the Tibs and Qtips of the world, and the way to rule their world is to make everyone completely dependent upon them. Who cares if they have to live in their own piss or pass Typhus to each other? Meanwhile, that woman has a NASTY audit coming her way in 3...2...1... 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: your cartoon is offensive to women who do not have a ***** to itch *edit: Really???? v*gina is censored? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 Is penis censored? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Is penis censored? Nope, gatorman still posts every damn day... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 WHICH IS SAYING SOMETHING: Gov. Gavin Newsom’s claim about the homeless was so absurd even Politifact couldn’t spin it. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, B-Man said: WHICH IS SAYING SOMETHING: Gov. Gavin Newsom’s claim about the homeless was so absurd even Politifact couldn’t spin it. . ...why is Gruesome Newsome a surprise?.....how many times has this state of disrepair recycled Moonbeam Jerry?.......Manhattan was 24 bucks?......bet the Chinese wouldn't pay a dime over 5 for this dump......and that's with a 'coopin........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 EVERGREEN QUESTION: What Will California Ban Next? Starting Tuesday, the sale of plastic water bottles will be banned at San Francisco International Airport, one of the few places they actually make sense. California has many dumb laws and statutes and bans, but this one is especially brainless—spurred by futile self-righteousness. After running late for your flight after a 30-minute security line only to have TSA confiscate your Fiji water bottle, you’ll now have to stop at a crowded water fountain to fill your own metal flask. Or buy an overpriced glass or aluminum bottle at the concession stand, paying another 10 cents for a bag. And your teeth will chatter if you drink through a paper straw. Of course you could risk dehydration instead: Men lose up to a half-gallon of water during a 10-hour flight. Oddly, you can still buy sugary drinks in plastic bottles at SFO; only healthy, calorie-free water is banned in plastic. You can’t make this stuff up. In California, you never have to. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 WEIRD, I WONDER WHY? Paging more doctors: California’s worsening physician shortage. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 San Francisco board rebrands 'convicted felon' as 'justice-involved person,' sanitizes other crime lingo Quote Crime-ridden San Francisco has introduced new sanitized language for criminals, getting rid of words such as “offender” and “addict” while changing “convicted felon” to “justice-involved person.” ... According to the San Francisco Chronicle, from now on a convicted felon or an offender released from custody will be known as a “formerly incarcerated person,” or a “justice-involved” person or just a “returning resident.” A juvenile “delinquent” will now be called a “young person with justice system involvement,” or a “young person impacted by the juvenile justice system.” And drug addicts or substance abusers, meanwhile, will become “a person with a history of substance use.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Hedge said: San Francisco board rebrands 'convicted felon' as 'justice-involved person,' sanitizes other crime lingo Is not right that we assume anyone's incarcerated status. They should tell us what incarcerated status they identify with. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Hedge said: San Francisco board rebrands 'convicted felon' as 'justice-involved person,' sanitizes other crime lingo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Hedge said: San Francisco board rebrands 'convicted felon' as 'justice-involved person,' sanitizes other crime lingo Trump is still Hitler though, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 24 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Trump is still Hitler though, right? That’s probably next. I doubt the Left is going to continue tolerating Hitler being compared to someone so evil. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 WHAT COULD GO WRONG?: The California Legislature is close to prohibiting schools from suspending students for willful disobedience. Alas, much of the effort by federal and state authorities to control local discipline policy is based on serious misunderstandings of the facts. I try to help correct that here. But there are many people out there who aren’t interested in getting the facts straight. by Gail Heriot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts