Jump to content

Unlike some years, there's not much to talk about now


Shaw66

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, NoSaint said:

Truly there’s a bunch but there’s not as much soap opera gossip 

 

 

Defensive line? Linebacker situation? Pass rush in general?

 

Wide receivers? Running back depth? Offensive line and whether we start 2018 with 3 new starters in the group?

Yeah, there are all those questions and more, but any discussion of it now is poor speculation.  You can talk about draft possibilities, but even that is pure speculation until we know what happens at qb in free agency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 3rdand12 said:

I know most speak of Castillo. But WRs Coach QB Coach etc ?

if Frazier leaves and I think he might. That might be more dramatic in regard to consistency/continuity of Coaching method.
prefer he stays another year (Mrs Pegula ? )

 

Yes, WR coach, QB coach and so forth.

 

They're all WCO guys.  I was expecting Daboll to install an Erhard Perkins system and I've been expecting him to want to bring in guys who have coached in that system before.  Plus from some stuff Bean said about "maybe the WR ran the wrong route" and how poorly our WR gained separation, I was thinking maybe they'd want to try someone new at WR coach.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Albwan said:

 

TT is going to be the qb. The lame playoffs killed any chance of improving, now we get to watch the rise of the jets.

I doubt it's Tyrod but whoever, the Bills will be better.  We won't be just watching the Jets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 3rdand12 said:

I know most speak of Castillo. But WRs Coach QB Coach etc ?

if Frazier leaves and I think he might. That might be more dramatic in regard to consistency/continuity of Coaching method.
prefer he stays another year (Mrs Pegula ? )

 

I'll be a little surprised if Frazier goes to the Colts. Not saying he's not qualified or would be a bad hire, but I think that fanbase will expect something more after the McDaniels fiasco. Reich would fit the bill IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

Yeah, there are all those questions and more, but any discussion of it now is poor speculation.  You can talk about draft possibilities, but even that is pure speculation until we know what happens at qb in free agency. 

 

How did Hughes play?

lawson?

milano?

how many wide receivers do we need? 

 

 

Thats all non-qb, non draft, lots of x and o talk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's never anything genuinely worth talking about. Other things are more worth doing.

 

But if you think who the QB is is a worthwhile subject, IMHO there are a bunch of others. Will we keep Gaines? Will we trade up? Will we trade down after we trade up if we trade up?

 

How many years will it be before we're genuinely competitive for a trophy? 

 

Lots to talk about, but all of it guesswork. Isn't that kind of what the boards are for?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

There's plenty of other stuff to talk about.  The new OC.  Drafting and signing FAs to other positions.  If Leslie get the Indy gig, what do we do there?  TO to HOF.  Zay's Mom. etc  ...

 

But all anybody WANTS to talk about is QB.

 

It's gonna be a long 3 months until the draft and then the complaining about who we did or didn't draft for QB takes over ...

 

All the stuff you listed there is to talk about isn't really worthy of any talk.

 

TO to hall of fame? Ok he deserved it.

Zays mom, I don't even care about Zay at this point.

Leslie won't get the Colts job.

No one can really conclusively say what the new OC wants to do.

 

The only thing worth talking about is the one you appear to dismiss, the QB 

Edited by Ol Dirty B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest question right now is what will we do in free agency. All this talk about drafting a QB is really just a waste of space. Will we go after Cousins? Sam Bradford? Nick Foles? If we sign someone to be our starter then there is very little chance that we move up in the draft. With all the holes we have I hope we stay put and draft defense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only you could make a post about that there is nothing to make a post about!

 

And you have 3 pages of replies so far.  Pretty cool.

 

For the naysayers, at least he isn't writing about nothing and pretending it is something like the sports people. Then again he has that luxury since he doesn't get paid to. :)

 

 

 

4 hours ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said:

The biggest question right now is what will we do in free agency. All this talk about drafting a QB is really just a waste of space. Will we go after Cousins? Sam Bradford? Nick Foles? If we sign someone to be our starter then there is very little chance that we move up in the draft. With all the holes we have I hope we stay put and draft defense

Help me out here. Lots of posters have your same opinion. 

 

I can't understand it at all. Don't you think that is just what we have been doing for 20 years now? Avoiding the big risk and being losers because of it?

 

Ask the freaking homecoming queen to the prom for gods sake. Take a freaking chance. What is so wrong with that idea?

 

Hep me understand if you care to please.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

 

 

 

 

Help me out here. Lots of posters have your same opinion. 

 

I can't understand it at all. Don't you think that is just what we have been doing for 20 years now? Avoiding the big risk and being losers because of it?

 

Ask the freaking homecoming queen to the prom for gods sake. Take a freaking chance. What is so wrong with that idea?

 

Hep me understand if you care to please.

We’re more than just a QB away. With the exception of the secondary, our defense was pretty dreadful last season. No pass rush whatsoever. The run defense got gashed pretty bad through parts of the season. Two of our defensive tackles were ranked dead last in league. And also if we move up to take a QB, there’s no guarantee that he’s going to make it in the NFL. All these guys look like studs coming out of college and then some don’t do **** in the pros. Look what Washington gave up to draft RG lll. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

There's never anything genuinely worth talking about. Other things are more worth doing.

 

But if you think who the QB is is a worthwhile subject, IMHO there are a bunch of others. Will we keep Gaines? Will we trade up? Will we trade down after we trade up if we trade up?

 

How many years will it be before we're genuinely competitive for a trophy? 

 

Lots to talk about, but all of it guesswork. Isn't that kind of what the boards are for?

Thurm - great response.  Thanks. 

 

Love the first para.  So true.  

 

Second para is what I was talking about and I don't agree with you.  Trade up trade down is all just speculation.  Too hard to say anything meaningful until the qb question is answered. 

 

Gaineas?  My view is that position players just don't matter that much.  A star yes, a guy who is just useful, you can always get another.  If winning the Super Bowl is the objective, it's like driving cross country.  If you're driving cross country, what shape your engine is in is important. That's like asking how good your qb is. IMO worrying about Gaines in February is like worrying about what brand windshield wipers you have.  Sure, the brands vary, but chances are the wipers you pick up at Auto Zone will do the trick.

 

When will the Bills be genuinely competitive?  Well worth talking about.   

 

And yes this is what the boards are for.  Some people find that talking about Gaines or the draft in February interesting.  I don't. That's all. 

2 hours ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

 

 

 

 

Help me out here. Lots of posters have your same opinion. 

 

I can't understand it at all. Don't you think that is just what we have been doing for 20 years now? Avoiding the big risk and being losers because of it?

 

Ask the freaking homecoming queen to the prom for gods sake. Take a freaking chance. What is so wrong with that idea?

 

Hep me understand if you care to please.

In my mind, spending a bundle on Cousins is taking a big risk just like trading up and going after a rookie.  Last times Bills took risks like that was Bledsoe then Losman. 

 

Now, you may say that Cousins isn't the prom queen, but I beg to differ.  Beauty is in the eye etc., and Cousins may be the kind of gal that gets McD's juices flowing. 

Edited by Shaw66
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

Only you could make a post about that there is nothing to make a post about!

 

And you have 3 pages of replies so far.  Pretty cool.

 

For the naysayers, at least he isn't writing about nothing and pretending it is something like the sports people. Then again he has that luxury since he doesn't get paid to. :)

 

 

 

 

Three pages of responses is proof the the OP is correct!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

Only you could make a post about that there is nothing to make a post about!

 

And you have 3 pages of replies so far.  Pretty cool.

 

For the naysayers, at least he isn't writing about nothing and pretending it is something like the sports people. Then again he has that luxury since he doesn't get paid to. :)

 

 

 

Help me out here. Lots of posters have your same opinion. 

 

I can't understand it at all. Don't you think that is just what we have been doing for 20 years now? Avoiding the big risk and being losers because of it?

 

Ask the freaking homecoming queen to the prom for gods sake. Take a freaking chance. What is so wrong with that idea?

 

Hep me understand if you care to please.

You don't move up to take a guy just to say you took a guy.  You move up if you think he's the QB that is the guy for the next 10-15 years, the guy that can lead a team to a championship.  You ask what's wrong with taking a chance?  Because you'd potentially waste a lot of picks if you're wrong.

 

If they think say Darnold is that kind of guy, then they should move up and do what's needed to get him.  If not they shouldn't.  And if they take that chance and it doesn't work (as happens about 50% of time with round 1 QBs) I won't then blast them for doing so.  Can you say the same?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said:

We’re more than just a QB away. With the exception of the secondary, our defense was pretty dreadful last season. No pass rush whatsoever. The run defense got gashed pretty bad through parts of the season. Two of our defensive tackles were ranked dead last in league. And also if we move up to take a QB, there’s no guarantee that he’s going to make it in the NFL. All these guys look like studs coming out of college and then some don’t do **** in the pros. Look what Washington gave up to draft RG lll. 

I agree we are more than just a QB away. But look at it my way a second.

 

How many years are there where there are no defensive players worth drafting? I would say none. Same with offense.

 

Except quarterback. There are years with no good ones, at all. 

 

How many years with no decent free agent quarterbacks to get? I would say there are almost never good ones available in free agency.

 

Whereas there is very often a good crop of free agent players at other spots.

 

I also think the more we build and strengthen at the pother spots, the better the record will be, and we will pick even lower and have even less chance at a good prospect.

 

I don't want them to spend a couple of years building the team and then still be a quarterback away. The "quarterback away" can last forever. Everything else you can take care of with just a little intelligence and a little luck. 

 

Can you at least see it my way a little bit?

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

I agree we are more than just a QB away. But look at it my way a second.

 

How many years are there where there are no defensive players worth drafting? I would say none. Same with offense.

 

Except quarterback. There are years with no good ones, at all. 

 

How many years with no decent free agent quarterbacks to get? I would say there are almost never good ones available in free agency.

 

Whereas there is very often a good crop of free agent players at other spots.

 

I also think the more we build and strengthen at the pother spots, the better the record will be, and we will pick even lower and have even less chance at a good prospect.

 

I don't want them to spend a couple of years building the team and then still be a quarterback away. The "quarterback away" can last forever. Everything else you can take care of with just a little intelligence and a little luck. 

 

Can you at least see it my way a little bit?

 

I definitely see what you’re saying. And even though I would rather stay put where we’re at and draft for other needs, I would **** my pants if we moved up to draft one of these coveted QBs and I would probably get right online and order their jersey. There’s nothing I want more than a franchise QB. A guy that will be a top 10 QB for the next 10+ years. I’m just skeptical about selling off all our assets to move up into the top 5. 1999 was a “strong” QB class as well and look at how most of them turned out...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...