Jump to content

BREAKING: Trump Supporters Share the Most Fake News


The_Dude

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

File for disability.  You are birth defected. 

I was thinking medications? I don't want to respond to that guy and give him any attention

whatsoever, he may be the worst troll i've ever come across...to the point where I don't even want to argue

with him, a first for me.

I strongly suspect he may be the most racist person on this board, it consumes him.

Edited by Albwan
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Albwan said:

I was thinking medications? I don't want to respond to that guy and give him any attention

whatsoever, he may be the worst troll i've ever come across...to the point where I don't even want to argue

with him, a first for me.

I strongly suspect he may be the most racist person on this board, it consumes him.

 

Because he is incapable.

 

My point of Americans sharing stories that they know are fake, just to point it out to others went right by him. He simply went back to his "look at your sources" BS,

as if that had anything to do with my reply :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

You're linking a story from Yahoo about sharing fake news, and you see absolutely no irony in this?  

 

Or this link if you prefer:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-supporters-share-more-fake-news-junk-news-oxford-study-a8199056.html

 

They claim their data comes from an Oxford study. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

Or this link if you prefer:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-supporters-share-more-fake-news-junk-news-oxford-study-a8199056.html

 

They claim their data comes from an Oxford study. 

 

 

 

How about looking up and linking the study itself?

 

Hint, it took less than 4 clicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

How about looking up and linking the study itself?

 

Hint, it took less than 4 clicks.

If you go to the actual study they include websites like nationalreview and New York daily mail as "junk" sites.  They aren't.  It's a flawed study.

 

I guess the estimated 10 million people who voted in 2012 for Obama that voted for Trump in 2016 was solely because of shared propaganda on the internet.  Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

If you go to the actual study they include websites like nationalreview and New York daily mail as "junk" sites.  They aren't.  It's a flawed study.

 

I guess the estimated 10 million people who voted in 2012 for Obama that voted for Trump in 2016 was solely because of shared propaganda on the internet.  Sigh.

 

Their argument literally rests on the idea that lots of Obama voters are too stupid to know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Their argument literally rests on the idea that lots of Obama voters are too stupid to know better.

LOL.  True.  There's a lot of reasons that Trump was able to flip a lot of traditional democratic counties in the Midwest.  Propaganda spread through social media would pry rank dead last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

If you go to the actual study they include websites like nationalreview and New York daily mail as "junk" sites.  They aren't.  It's a flawed study.

 

I guess the estimated 10 million people who voted in 2012 for Obama that voted for Trump in 2016 was solely because of shared propaganda on the internet.  Sigh.

Yup, but I really wanted the dude to do his own homework.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

 

Or this link if you prefer:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-supporters-share-more-fake-news-junk-news-oxford-study-a8199056.html

 

They claim their data comes from an Oxford study. 

 

 

Link the article, if you want anyone to give a damn. Really, this amounts to bs to anyone who is familiar with statistics.

 

"There're lies. There're damned lies. The, there're statistics."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, LeviF91 said:

Wait so Trump supporters share the most CNN? That seems odd.

CNN is one sided and has been that way long before Alternate Truth became a meme, FOX News is one sided.

 

Sean Hannity (the mouthpiece) for Conservatives spreads so much hate and disdain its ridiculous and the base sucks his crap up.   

don't pretend only one side is bad.   It is not helping to unite a divided America 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

CNN is one sided

 

Wait, really?  All I heard for years was that CNN was completely unbiased and could be trusted much more than those devils down at FOX! Say it ain't so! All these years of watching Wolf Bitcher down the drain!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libtard:  CNN isn't biased

 

Thinker:  Yes it is, even liberal thinktanks have published that 98% of its reporting on Trump is unfairly negative

 

Libtard:  well...... Fox is biased!!!!

 

Thinker: (so you admit a complete reversal in 10 seconds and it doesn't sink in at all...)

 

next day:

 

Libtard:  CNN isn't biased.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...