Jump to content

Romo/Nance Announcing Team


Irv

Recommended Posts

I thought Tony Romo did a great job yesterday and all year long.  In my opinion, the combo of Nance and Romo is right up there with the all-time best.  Romo a) knows what he is talking about, b) is not afraid to say it when players do well/screw up,  and c) has a great, down-home delivery.  The other thing I like is that he is not too technical that you can't understand him.  While I love Kelso, sometimes I get lost in all the football jargon.  I wonder if Jay Cutler will be similar to Romo?  Let's hope so.   

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game so I didn't listen to the broadcast and I didn't record it and it was such a boring game I don't plan on re-watching, but I'm curious... how critical were they of Taylor?

 

From my seat it looked like there were open receivers on plays where Taylor threw it away. Did they mention that on the broadcast?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Romo has been a great addition to commentary, he is already one of the best ever for my 40 years of watching.

 

Nantz is a passive nothing of an announcer that was being dragged down by Simms.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fridge said:

I was at the game so I didn't listen to the broadcast and I didn't record it and it was such a boring game I don't plan on re-watching, but I'm curious... how critical were they of Taylor?

 

From my seat it looked like there were open receivers on plays where Taylor threw it away. Did they mention that on the broadcast?

He was more critical than most, highlighting specific weak areas if his game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ShadyBillsFan said:

I like Romo for his knowledge of the game over people who think they know the game.  

 

He's honest in his calls and tells you who missed what.  

I see nothing wrong with that. 

I find it incredibly refreshing. If the commentators aren't giving me tools to help better understand the game, I'd rather they just not be there. That's why I like Romo. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Badthingsman said:

I thought Tony Romo did a great job yesterday and all year long.  In my opinion, the combo of Nance and Romo is right up there with the all-time best.  Romo a) knows what he is talking about, b) is not afraid to say it when players do well/screw up,  and c) has a great, down-home delivery.  The other thing I like is that he is not too technical that you can't understand him.  While I love Kelso, sometimes I get lost in all the football jargon.  I wonder if Jay Cutler will be similar to Romo?  Let's hope so.   

1.  Love the combo of Romo and Nantz

2.  Love Romo

3.  Nantz is spelled Nantz not Nance

4.  I NEVER want to listen to a word out of Cutler's mouth

2 minutes ago, sodbuster said:

I find it incredibly refreshing. If the commentators aren't giving me tools to help better understand the game, I'd rather they just not be there. That's why I like Romo. 

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Romo's....ability?...to say the truth about what is happening is refreshing. So tired of the hedging on guys: 

 

"He missed that throw, but ya know...the sun was in his eyes and earth's axis tilted 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% during that play."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nantz said "McCoy" when he was referring to Taylor. It was just once, but I thought it was funny because when a female announcer did it, people got on her case.

 

In general, Nantz is a good play-by-play announcer. Romo is quickly becoming my favorite color guy.

 

One thing I liked about both of them was when they were discussing the final interception and whether it should be overturned. Frankly, I thought it was a clean pick - the ball moved, but it sure looked like his hand was under it. Either way, it wasn't conclusive. Romo said, "Well it's inconclusive, so they shouldn't overturn it." Nantz replied, "They've been  doing it all season!" I wonder if he'll get a nasty note from the league for that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Badthingsman said:

I thought Tony Romo did a great job yesterday and all year long.  In my opinion, the combo of Nance and Romo is right up there with the all-time best.  Romo a) knows what he is talking about, b) is not afraid to say it when players do well/screw up,  and c) has a great, down-home delivery.  The other thing I like is that he is not too technical that you can't understand him.  While I love Kelso, sometimes I get lost in all the football jargon.  I wonder if Jay Cutler will be similar to Romo?  Let's hope so.   

 Absolutely agree.  Romo is the best analyst around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rico said:

Romo is good.

 

i think anyone who thinks Nantz is good has never heard him call a Pats game.

 

Nantz does the drone work well, he doesn't interject himself into the call at all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...