26CornerBlitz Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 Good move with them out of the Postseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 There was really no reason to risk getting re-injured or injured in any other way out there. Smart move by the Pack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 1 hour ago, H2o said: There was really no reason to risk getting re-injured or injured in any other way out there. Smart move by the Pack. ....exactly.....guy was bound to be Romo II with another break................see now what McCarthy mettle is like riding Hundley.....need Ice Bowl to chime in.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 Wise decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 18 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Good move with them out of the Postseason. Exactly...and will help their draft position maybe as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 They should be fined for this. He’s not injured. You can’t just stick him on IR for the extra roster spot without an injury. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 On 12/20/2017 at 9:32 AM, JR in Pittsburgh said: They should be fined for this. He’s not injured. You can’t just stick him on IR for the extra roster spot without an injury. To be fair, at this point in his career he’s likely walking around with 3 different injuries that SHOULD have him sitting any given week. The term “healthy” for a vet is pretty fluid and I’d think it’s a lot harder to prove a guy is 100% than a guy has some sort of nagging injury or risk. it opens an interesting discussion though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLTbills Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 2 minutes ago, NoSaint said: To be fair, at this point in his career he’s likely walking around with 3 different injuries that SHOULD have him sitting any given week. The term “healthy” for a vet is pretty fluid and I’d think it’s a lot harder to prove a guy is 100% than a guy has some sort of nagging injury or risk. it opens an interesting discussion though Yeah. One of those things that's impossible to prove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
judman Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 It’s gonna be interesting to see if this “he should be released” thing gathers steam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 Releasing him would be moot. He's a vested veteran so he wouldn't be subjected to waivers, meaning he'd be a free agent immediately, and he'd re-sign with the Packers anyway. It would just be a lot of paperwork for nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 Just now, Doc said: Releasing him would be moot. He's a vested veteran so he wouldn't be subjected to waivers, meaning he'd be a free agent immediately, and he'd re-sign with the Packers anyway. It would just be a lot of paperwork for nothing. Not true if they were forced to release him with the trade deadline passed. He would be subject to waivers. Just now, Doc said: The league probably approved it because they probably believe releasing him would be moot as well. This is not correct. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Not true if they were forced to release him with the trade deadline passed. He would be subject to waivers. Oops, you're right. Never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenigmusx Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 (edited) We have the cap space. This move would make us an instant Super Bowl contender. Rodgers would get the plus of being able to beat up in Tom Brady twice next year. Edited December 24, 2017 by Lenigmusx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 he's not getting released. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 Not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsfansinceday1 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 (edited) What? Edited December 24, 2017 by Billsfansinceday1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 It’s possible: http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21863467/teams-complain-nfl-green-bay-packers-violated-ir-rule-think-aaron-rodgers-released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenigmusx Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 ESPN believe it or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts