smuvtalker Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 Tasker more deserving than TO? I guess he's more deserving than Randy Moss too. For me, the reason I listed Tasker as most deserving is because it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that TO gets in; whereas Tasker SHOULD get in, but I don't think too many people outside the city of Buffalo and football "experts" feel the same... But TO is most definitely deserving... ....but they should also have been productive at their natural position as Tasker was.......... +100. Absolutely agree with you 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 TO deserves to be in, but based on ridiculous "grudges" voters might have he might not get in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 (edited) ....want to make a change in the relevancy of HOF voters and get the minions out from the cover of their desks?....PUBLISH every damn vote by voter by nominee.........and then let the media interview frenzy begin as to why ABC voted against XYZ........popcorn sales jump 82%................ Edited September 16, 2017 by OldTimeAFLGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoTier Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 Owens and Knox are both most likely to get in and probably most deserving from the perspective of their careers in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo716 Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 ....want to make a change in the relevancy of HOF voters and get the minions out from the cover of their desks?....PUBLISH every damn vote by voter by nominee.........and then let the media interview frenzy begin as to why ABC voted against XYZ........popcorn sales jump 82%................ Baseball is going public with there HoF voting next year. Let's see who voted for Clemens but not Barry Bonds or vice versa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 Hull, Talley, Tasker for certain. TO should make it but not as a Bill. One year, did nothing memorable or career defining while in BFLO. Players in NFL do not go in for one team although some will have a team spokesman introduce them for induction. Ruben - hell no to either, him for quitting on the team. If he ever went it, let it be as a Bear. Ruben did not quit on team - he rebelled because coaching was putting them in bad position and he was penalized for it, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 Baseball is going public with there HoF voting next year. Let's see who voted for Clemens but not Barry Bonds or vice versa ...wow!!...thanks for info bud...good to know...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 For me, the reason I listed Tasker as most deserving is because it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that TO gets in; whereas Tasker SHOULD get in, but I don't think too many people outside the city of Buffalo and football "experts" feel the same... Many football "experts" including opposing coaches and players have stated that he belongs in but there is a portion of the press, members for who most never played the game, who do not think special teams players belong in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo716 Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 ...wow!!...thanks for info bud...good to know...... Yes it's definitely interesting I'm willing to bet people put away old grudges fast because as you said... voter abc does NOT want to be known publicly as the guy who black listed xyz from the HoF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 I don't really consider TO a Bill but he should get in. May not for a while because if his crap through the years. Brown should get in, 9 ProBowl years. Tasked should be top of the list but won't ever get in because the voters refuse to acknowledge anything but kickers for the Hall, and even then rarely. Hull was under appreciated but won't get near enough buzz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hondo in seattle Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 (edited) TO is not my favorite player but he's earned membership in the HOF. Brown has the stats (9 Pro Bowls) but when I watched him play, I never felt like I was watching a Hall of Famer. I'm torn with Tasker. Edited September 16, 2017 by hondo in seattle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 TO is top 3 at his position all time. That's a no brainer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 You can make a case for all of them. That is no BS either, they are all above the lowest standard set by some already in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 TO is most deserving and most likely. I don't necessarily think Tasker is deserving but when they put a kicker in I think he probably is. And P Ray Guy is deserving because he was a generational player. A three time All Pro in Bennett is deserving. I'm curious as to all the eligible players who made All Pro three times that are not in. Doubt there is many. I'm also a believer that Walt Corey misused Biscuit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 (edited) TO is top 3 at his position all time. That's a no brainer ...but the urinalists hated his disdain for the media........so they can punish him with their vote being a big secret......was he a diva?...of course...but wasn't Moss a diva?...of course again....and he'll be 1st ballot........... Edited September 16, 2017 by OldTimeAFLGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metzelaars_lives Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 The people on here saying that Steve Tasker is a more deserving hall of famer than Terrell Owens- I can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDogg20 Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 TO deserves to be in, but based on ridiculous "grudges" voters might have he might not get inHe'll get in, it's just a matter of when. IMO he should have been 1st ballot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 ...TO will be punished for a LONG time as he was never a media darling and some of the minions voting subjectively hold personal grudges versus objective analysis.........I'd bet Jerry Sullivan would vote against his mother............. Regardless.....he's the most deserving and most likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 ...TO will be punished for a LONG time as he was never a media darling and some of the minions voting subjectively hold personal grudges versus objective analysis.........I'd bet Jerry Sullivan would vote against his mother............. I overall agree with your point. But he literally murder teams because he was a selfish idiot. A guy as talented as him shouldn't bounce around like he did but he was always more about himself than the team. Philly could have had something special but he was only about himself. He will get in because he's a great talent. But he seemed so desperate to be famous and ultimately never found a home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
folz Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 The people on here saying that Steve Tasker is a more deserving hall of famer than Terrell Owens- I can't. I think it is like another poster said upthread...we don't think Tasker is more deserving than TO, but having already picked TO as most likely and assuming that he is a lock (at some point), we chose Tasker for the most deserving category. Of course, we could have instead said TO most likely and most deserving and then made a case for Tasker separately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts