The Big Cat Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Oh, horse hockey. Sullivan's been grand fathered into a dying fraternity. His credibility is measured only in years served. Nobody under the age of 40 in 2017 could be as vapid/employed as him. He started writing his column for tomorrow before halftime: https://twitter.com/ByJerrySullivan/status/906945581213470726 Why? Because he can. Because in his age demo, there still exists enough bags of stale farts to keep his dreadfully predictable content marketable to ad buyers. I'm looking at some of you. A lot of you. Most of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Oh, horse hockey. Sullivan's been grand fathered into a dying fraternity. His credibility is measured only in years served. Nobody under the age of 40 in 2017 could be as vapid/employed as him. He started writing his column for tomorrow before halftime: https://twitter.com/ByJerrySullivan/status/906945581213470726 Why? Because he can. Because in his age demo, there still exists enough bags of stale farts to keep his dreadfully predictable content marketable to ad buyers. I'm looking at some of you. A lot of you. Most of you. Atta boy. Talking down as usual. There were some three and outs today but the defense didn't crap the bed. Still love Rex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Atta boy. Talking down as usual. There were some three and outs today but the defense didn't crap the bed. Still love Rex? Get a life, loser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Why the hell do we care about who gets how many targets? As long as we get down the field and score, isn't that all that matters? Yes, but as we have often seen - there are ways to do that consistently and ways to steal a win on a Sunday. Using your WRs is generally considered a positive in the passing game over the long haul. It's a fair wonder moving forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 What about the folks who were mocked for saying Clay will be the #1 WR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Why? Because he can. Sully realized long ago that filling column inches was all that was required of him. So exerting as little effort as possible is his SOP... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Get a life, loser. That's not nice but is consistent with your first post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Jerry Sullivan does sound like a miserable SOB That is an insult to miserable SOBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted September 11, 2017 Author Share Posted September 11, 2017 I thought it was Sully but I've never heard him speak with the camera on. I don't think it is an unreasonable question. He is a hack with an agenda though. His agenda this year is the team made moves for 2018 and not to win in 2017. So he will look for angles that fit that narrative, like trading Watkins. He won't mention that the DB play without Darby/Gilmore was more than adequate. Add the fact Sammy only had 58 yards receiving on 5 targets. At least after game 1, the trades are at worst a tie and maybe favor Buffalo a bit even without factoring in the Darby injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloflash Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Jerry Sullivan does sound like a miserable SOB Yeah,Or Jerry being Jerry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 I don't read the Buffalo News anymore. And WGR in the afternoon is completely unlistenable. Didn't bother with the post game thinking it was Schoop that hosted it and I've pretty much decided to cut him completely out of my life and I'm a much happier fan bc of it. Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 I thought it was Sully but I've never heard him speak with the camera on. I don't think it is an unreasonable question. He is a hack with an agenda though. His agenda this year is the team made moves for 2018 and not to win in 2017. So he will look for angles that fit that narrative, like trading Watkins. He won't mention that the DB play without Darby/Gilmore was more than adequate. Add the fact Sammy only had 58 yards receiving on 5 targets. At least after game 1, the trades are at worst a tie and maybe favor Buffalo a bit even without factoring in the Darby injury. It's not an unreasonable question? One game is a correct sample size? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsmovinup Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) I'm looking at some of you. A lot of you. Most of you. Thanks dad. Well try to do better. Edited September 11, 2017 by Billsmovinup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezertbill Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Jerry Sullivan does sound like a miserable SOB He just finds the negative in everything. His credibility has evaporated over the years. Only has a few old hacks that keep agreeing with him. He used to be a really good columnist. My guess is the Bills' playoff drought matches his nookie drought. I think McD answered him perfectly and shut him up. He probably would have asked Brady after Thursday's game why he didn't pass to Edelman more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 I already know what he'll say so...pass. McBeane are Jerry Sullivan's worst nightmare. A competent Bills regime. What will he write about now? and who will pay to read it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMF2006 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 I think it's a fair question and coach had a good answer. It's not something to be overly concerned about after one game, but if a trend were to persist it would be a concern. You can't win consistently in the NFL without having your WRs more involved. If you have a healthy #25 in the backfield you have a chance to win every week. You don't think the Jests wanted to slow him down? He ran rampant for the most part and they had no answer. We need the WRs to block better for him and to catch it when its thrown to them....thats it...thats all..... its not like the Bills have a 35 yr old Tom Brady at QB dishing the ball out everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 It was Sullivan. I thought Tyrod's answer made a lot of sense - we didn't think their linebackers (who are garbage, trash and useless) could match up with Clay and McCoy. That makes sense to me. Doesn't necessarily mean I have no concerns going forward about our WR group.... not sure whether the talent there is what it could be to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Bomb Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Why the hell do we care about who gets how many targets? As long as we get down the field and score, isn't that all that matters? Because this is a passing league and you need good WR's to be anything other than a middling team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Why is it that when other teams tailor their offense to what defenses are doing it's smart, but when the Bills do it it's questioned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Why is it that when other teams tailor their offense to what defenses are doing it's smart, but when the Bills do it it's questioned? Because Jerry Sullivan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts