Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

but the big swings will be timed for maximum political impact re: the midterms (imo).

 

Just what you want from an investigation in to the politicization of the FBI and Justice Department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

He can plead the 5th all he wants.  They have all the evidence they need to crush him like a bug.  His best hope is to cut a massive deal and roll over on those above him in order to lessen the charges against him.

 

I'm sure Strzok has already consulted legal counsel for his upcoming testimony.  But I wonder if he has consulted a cardiologist for that unexpected heart attack

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Like Tasker said, he has no obligation to incriminate himself, and Congress itself can't do anything but recommend indictments. It would still be up to the DOJ/Sessions/Huber to bring formal charges however. 

 

They're coming. Just likely not until after the FISA report drops. Remember how intertwined the MYE report and the FISA/Russia investigation reports are. They've spent almost two years readying the evidence and laying the tracks for this plan... but the big swings will be timed for maximum political impact re: the midterms (imo).

 

Min not trying to be a moron or disrespectful by asking this, but......,.....:

 

Why even have him come before Congressif they already have him by the cashews?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, njbuff said:

Can they do anything to Strzok if he gives them nothing or if he pleads the 5th the entire time?

 

Peter "Gimmie a" Strzok was the lead investigator in both the Hillary email scandal and the Trump Russian Collusion Delusion This is all America needs to know about this dirtbag.

 

I wish Congress could hang this anti-American prick by his balls.

More than likely he will be a co winner of the nobel peace prize with maxine waters.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

Min not trying to be a moron or disrespectful by asking this, but......,.....:

 

Why even have him come before Congressif they already have him by the cashews?

Getting him on record is key to future prosecution. He also may lead them to proof on others.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

Min not trying to be a moron or disrespectful by asking this, but......,.....:

 

Why even have him come before Congressif they already have him by the cashews?

 

Questions are always good, don't worry there. :beer:

 

Not everyone is in on the full scope of this plan (meaning Huber's scope/assignment). Goodlatte/Nunes seem to be, Jordan, Gowdy, and some of the more vocal Freedom Caucusers don't seem to be. Those who aren't in on the full scope are pushing for it for the reason 3rd stated above. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2017 at 9:48 AM, Chef Jim said:

They didn't screw us over. They made sure we don't have a President Clinton II. I commend them for that.

 

The People again wisely spoke.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No surprise. He was being advised by FBI lawyers, not his own, not to answer many questions. 

 

Walk that through... he's in deep shite, and so are a lot of other big names. The DOJ can't talk about ongoing cases, even behind closed doors with Congressmen (especially when some of those ongoing cases are about some of those very same congressmen). 

 

 

Huber's been submitting sealed indictments for months now.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I fully understand why the FBIs inner workings can't always be made public right away or even years on. But 3 FBI lawyers to help a guy refuse to answer congress?  Nope.

 

Close the meeting to reporters?  I can see it.  Refuse to answer to congress' oversight?  How does that make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“The Incredible Smugness of Being” - a novel by Peter Strzok co-authored by Rob Rosenstein, with a foreward by James Comey. Published by Penguin Books, it will be available in bookstores in early October, 2018. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

I fully understand why the FBIs inner workings can't always be made public right away or even years on. But 3 FBI lawyers to help a guy refuse to answer congress?  Nope.

 

Close the meeting to reporters?  I can see it.  Refuse to answer to congress' oversight?  How does that make sense?

 

Separation of powers.  Constant struggle between the executive and legislature.  Remember, Bush claimed executive privilege to outright refuse and ignore Congressional subpoenas...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nanker said:

“The Incredible Smugness of Being” - a novel by Peter Strzok co-authored by Rob Rosenstein, with a foreward by James Comey. Published by Penguin Books, it will be available in bookstores in early October, 2018. 

 

 

with an intended softball cushy interview slate with liberal media

 

and not even liberal media can play along

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Separation of powers.  Constant struggle between the executive and legislature.  Remember, Bush claimed executive privilege to outright refuse and ignore Congressional subpoenas...

Congress has oversight powers.  But going with your explanation, couldn't Trump order Strozkozloszk to answer Congress' questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

I fully understand why the FBIs inner workings can't always be made public right away or even years on. But 3 FBI lawyers to help a guy refuse to answer congress?  Nope.

 

Close the meeting to reporters?  I can see it.  Refuse to answer to congress' oversight?  How does that make sense?


As I understand it, some of the questions cannot be answered if the replies might compromise an ongoing criminal investigation (and let's face it, Strzok would not be unhappy about not answering them). Maybe they are there to tackle him if he attempts to answer those types of questions? (not that he would, not in his best interest)

It is the same with many of the documents  Congress keeps requesting. If they are part of an ongoing criminal investigation they cannot be turned over. It does make for great political theater for Congress to keep requesting what they cannot receive. I'm not sure whether RR is a good guy or a bad guy or just a guy just trying to survive a mess, but some of the documents he cannot turn over (although I am sure there is other stuff he can turn over he is slow-walking).

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MANAFORT’S JUDGE BLASTS SPECIAL COUNSEL PRACTICES

On Tuesday, Judge T.S. Ellis of the Eastern District of Virginia denied Paul Manafort’s motion to dismiss the criminal charges that have been brought against him by special counsel Robert Mueller. Simply put, Manafort’s argument was that the charges against him–essentially, tax evasion with regard to millions of dollars he received from the Ukraine government–long preceded, and had nothing to do with, the supposed subject of Mueller’s investigation, alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...