Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Pretty good. If they gave one to Barry for doing absolutely nothing... No, they gave it to him because he's black. Let's be frank about THAT matter. Had nothing to do with what he did or didn't do. It had EVERYTHING to do with the color of his skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 and that he wasn't W. It was as much a F-U to W than anything the future drone assassin in chief had accomplished. Of course they have a grand tradition of supporting Nazis in both Finland and Sweden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 No, they gave it to him because he's black. Let's be frank about THAT matter. Had nothing to do with what he did or didn't do. It had EVERYTHING to do with the color of his skin. Oh, I know. But he had/has nothing to do with being black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Trump. What a racist ahole for not wanting to let in the subhuman barbarians that blew up Brussels. Man he's such a kook! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 (edited) I caught the first half of his speech at AIPAC yesterday. It was tough talk against Iran and the UN, and very pro-Israel. He must have had 8 or 9 standing ovations in the short time I watched. Then again, a portion of their leadership disavowed themselves of his criticism of both Obama and Clinton, calling his rhetoric "too divisive" this morning. But that statement is at odds with what I saw yesterday. Edited March 22, 2016 by Azalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 I caught the first half of his speech at AIPAC yesterday. It was tough talk against Iran and the UN, and very pro-Israel. He must have had 8 or 9 standing ovations in the short time I watched. Then again, a portion of their leadership disavowed themselves of his criticism of both Obama and Clinton, calling his rhetoric "too divisive" this morning. But that statement is at odds with what I saw yesterday. And it's at odds with Hillary's own speech at AIPAC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 And it's at odds with Hillary's own speech at AIPAC. Well, half of what Hillary says is at odds with the other half of what Hillary says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Trump. What a racist ahole for not wanting to let in the subhuman barbarians that blew up Brussels. Man he's such a kook! You'd have a bigger point if Trump proposed blocking people from Mid East or other volatile regions in, as opposed to denying entry to all Muslims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 You'd have a bigger point if Trump proposed blocking people from Mid East or other volatile regions in, as opposed to denying entry to all Muslims. How is that feasible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 How is that feasible? That's not the point, because in reality it's not feasible. But it shows a separation between a real candidate and a carney clown. A real candidate would stake out a claim by proposing a block on migrants from the war-torn regions, a carney clown candidate would propose a block on an entire global religion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 That's not the point, because in reality it's not feasible. But it shows a separation between a real candidate and a carney clown. A real candidate would stake out a claim by proposing a block on migrants from the war-torn regions, a carney clown candidate would propose a block on an entire global religion. Are all Islamic extremists necessarily from war-torn regions? Or are they all Muslim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Are all Islamic extremists necessarily from war-torn regions? Or are they all Muslim? No to both, so why the need to single out only and all Muslims? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 No to both, so why the need to single out only and all Muslims? Because some followers of that particular religion are the ones causing the problems? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 No to both, so why the need to single out only and all Muslims? Did you just tell me that not all Islamic terrorists are Muslim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Did you just tell me that not all Islamic terrorists are Muslim? Not all. There are some sympathizers/collaborators who aren't Muslim. How did Farook obtain his guns? That's why Trump's blanket statement is stupid. Because some followers of that particular religion are the ones causing the problems? Some followers of that particular religion are absolutely the ones causing the problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Not all. There are some sympathizers/collaborators who aren't Muslim. How did Farook obtain his guns? That's why Trump's blanket statement is stupid. Some followers of that particular religion are absolutely the ones causing the problems. Sympathizers and collaborators who haven't killed a single person directly. What religion did Farook follow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Some followers of that particular religion are absolutely the ones causing the problems. So if it can't be guaranteed that one muslim is and one isn't a terrorist, it makes sense not to allow any into the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 (edited) Well, half of what Hillary says is at odds with the other half of what Hillary says. That's called balance. You know, a balanced approach. Edited March 22, 2016 by keepthefaith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Sympathizers and collaborators who haven't killed a single person directly. What religion did Farook follow? By that nature, the driver of McVeigh's truck, or any get away drivers aren't guilty either. Let's free Khaled Mohammed too, since he didn't fly the planes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts