row_33 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 Dems: only me and my rich friends should have private ownership rights to guns and if they say anything less than that they are lying. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 Leftist/Media/dems/ (students ?) fail NBC/WSJ poll shocker: Majority of Americans say owning a gun increases safety Quick !.........more marches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Leftist/Media/dems/ (students ?) fail NBC/WSJ poll shocker: Majority of Americans say owning a gun increases safety Quick !.........more marches. The two biggest problems with Controlling the Narrative are: Who is allowed to speak Who is allowed to listen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 I guess common sense is out the window. Hey morons who wanna outlaw guns............. criminals will ALWAYS get guns, no matter what laws are on the books. This whole thing stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 (edited) More guns..................wins again. Wow, so a killer was deterred by armed security and instead chose a 'gun free' zone. Shocking! http://www.latimes.com/opinion/readersreact/la-ol-le-gun-free-zones-mass-shootings-20160713-snap-story.html?outputType=amp … https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/979049763399233536 … Ever since the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, many on the Left have cited the lack of immediate response from the deputy on duty as evidence that the “good guy with a gun” approach isn’t an effective deterrent to would-be shooters. At the same time, more “gun free zones” liberals say help ensure everyone’s safety have been called for. With that in mind, here’s the latest news about Pulse Nightclub mass murderer Omar Mateen and why he chose that location: Quote NBC News ✔ @NBCNews Prosecutors: Pulse attacker intended to attack Disney World's shopping and entertainment complex by hiding a gun in a stroller, but became spooked by police and instead chose the gay club as his target. https://nbcnews.to/2pKPlNq He got “spooked”? In other words: he was deterred by good guys with guns. . Edited March 28, 2018 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: More guns..................wins again. Wow, so a killer was deterred by armed security and instead chose a 'gun free' zone. Shocking! http://www.latimes.com/opinion/readersreact/la-ol-le-gun-free-zones-mass-shootings-20160713-snap-story.html?outputType=amp … https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/979049763399233536 … Ever since the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, many on the Left have cited the lack of immediate response from the deputy on duty as evidence that the “good guy with a gun” approach isn’t an effective deterrent to would-be shooters. At the same time, more “gun free zones” liberals say help ensure everyone’s safety have been called for. With that in mind, here’s the latest news about Pulse Nightclub mass murderer Omar Mateen and why he chose that location: He got “spooked”? In other words: he was deterred by good guys with guns. . This is a fairly obvious point. Mass shooters seek out victims. Victims are more easily found among the disarmed. This is buttressed by the fact the most mass shooters shoot themselves after being engaged. They are not interested in fire fights. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 54 minutes ago, B-Man said: The government wasn't violating their rights, though. They were separate independent nations. The government was violating treaties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 On 3/23/2018 at 8:46 PM, B-Man said: Leftist/Media/dems/ (students ?) fail NBC/WSJ poll shocker: Majority of Americans say owning a gun increases safety Quick !.........more marches. Okay, but the purpose of the march was to ban call for a ban of selling semi-automatic rifles similar to the AR-15. I think. Every poll I've looked at has at least 60% agree (regardless of how the semi-automatic rifle was defined/worded) in the question. I personally am fine with the gun laws now, but I believe that was the purpose of the march. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 12 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Okay, but the purpose of the march was to ban call for a ban of selling semi-automatic rifles similar to the AR-15. I think. Every poll I've looked at has at least 60% agree (regardless of how the semi-automatic rifle was defined/worded) in the question. I personally am fine with the gun laws now, but I believe that was the purpose of the march. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 6 hours ago, LeviF91 said: Well, that's a bad example if you're arguing the purpose of the march wasn't just to ban semi-automatic rifles similar to the AR-15. It looks like an AR-15 which people blame them still being legal to buy because of the 2nd Amendment if the sole purpose was to ban. There were some signs though that said ban all guns and abolish 2nd amendment so the message of the march was a little nebulous. If they interviewed people you'd probably get many different answers on what changes they want to see to existing gun laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 6 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Well, that's a bad example if you're arguing the purpose of the march wasn't just to ban semi-automatic rifles similar to the AR-15. It looks like an AR-15 which people blame them still being legal to buy because of the 2nd Amendment if the sole purpose was to ban. There were some signs though that said ban all guns and abolish 2nd amendment so the message of the march was a little nebulous. If they interviewed people you'd probably get many different answers on what changes they want to see to existing gun laws. Regardless of what their stated purpose might be, their actual purpose is to ban private ownership of firearms. They'll take inch after inch until they get the whole mile, as the last 100 years of legislation clearly demonstrate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 18 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Well, that's a bad example if you're arguing the purpose of the march wasn't just to ban semi-automatic rifles similar to the AR-15. It looks like an AR-15 which people blame them still being legal to buy because of the 2nd Amendment if the sole purpose was to ban. There were some signs though that said ban all guns and abolish 2nd amendment so the message of the march was a little nebulous. If they interviewed people you'd probably get many different answers on what changes they want to see to existing gun laws. The liberal purpose is to strip all Americans of the right to private gun ownership, and if they don't say it they are lying by omission. Liberals amend this by making sure that they and their rich and powerful friends retain their right to private gun ownership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Virtually every hand gun, and shotgun sold in America is a semi-automatic. Many rifles are too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 LOOKS LIKE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE GOP is forcing Dems to go on the record about repealing the 2d Amendment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 18 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Well, that's a bad example if you're arguing the purpose of the march wasn't just to ban semi-automatic rifles similar to the AR-15. It looks like an AR-15 which people blame them still being legal to buy because of the 2nd Amendment if the sole purpose was to ban. There were some signs though that said ban all guns and abolish 2nd amendment so the message of the march was a little nebulous. If they interviewed people you'd probably get many different answers on what changes they want to see to existing gun laws. I am still immensely dividied on this subject and will always be, along with abortion. But, disirregardless of how I feel about guns and what is right or wrong it is a right given to us. So, as disclosure I have shifted from a viewpoint of limiting gun ownership 20 years ago to repealing all gun laws now. And I own no firearms, as preferenced by !@#$s who said I shouldn't. So, the biggest issue tackling the second is the group wanting to tweak the second amendment begins by trying to whittle down the right piece by piece on something they seem to know very little about. In their stream of consciousness they take away every bit of gun ownership until they make the 2nd a moot point. At that point the majority of the country becomes opposed. If they want to take any momentum they need to take a better tactical approach and stop shitting in themselves. When Rubio was ready to ban bump stocks and all of that they said it wasn't enough and mocked him. That took all pressure off Rubio to comply. Nothing was good enough in their argument and all the voices crying for change just became noise. They need to look at how MADD changed alcohol sales and go systematically at each state, at each leader, at each local level and then blast the federal government in to a con to change everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 “We are in the process of removing our ads from Laura Ingraham’s program,” Nutrish tweeted Thursday morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 16 minutes ago, Tiberius said: “We are in the process of removing our ads from Laura Ingraham’s program,” Nutrish tweeted Thursday morning. Damn... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts