BringBackFergy Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Does 2+2 always equal 4? Please explain and show your work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 (edited) yes and... Edited July 8, 2014 by The Poojer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Can we have this edited to be a poll? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 I had a math teacher in college that spent a 2 hour lecture explaining how 2+2=trumpet Seriously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Yes, it always equals 4. As in how many Super Bowl Championships the Bills should have. Understand now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted July 8, 2014 Author Share Posted July 8, 2014 I can appreciate you gentlemen (and I use that term loosely) making conclusory statements that 2+2 should always equal 4, but there have to be instances where the equation can equal something other than 4...I don't buy the simple explanation as you were taught in 2nd grade. Polls are not appropriate because you need to show your work...where the heck is OCinBuffalo or DCTom?? I want to see a proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 4? Says who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted July 8, 2014 Author Share Posted July 8, 2014 4? Says who? My point exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 I can appreciate you gentlemen (and I use that term loosely) making conclusory statements that 2+2 should always equal 4, but there have to be instances where the equation can equal something other than 4...I don't buy the simple explanation as you were taught in 2nd grade. Polls are not appropriate because you need to show your work...where the heck is OCinBuffalo or DCTom?? I want to see a proof. racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 3.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICanSleepWhenI'mDead Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 . . . I want to see a proof. http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/pdf/Laplace_Table.pdf f (t)=L-1 F(s) F(s)=L f (t) f (t)=L-1 F(s) F(s)=L f (t) {}{}{}{}1.1 3. tn, 5. t 1 2.eat s s-a 1 G(p+1) sp+1 n=1,2,3,K n! 4. tp ,p>-1 sn+1 p 6. tn-12, n=1,2,3,K 22 1×3×5L(2n-1) p 2s3 a 8. tsin(at) 2 10. (s2 +a2) 2a3 sin(at)-atcos(at) 2 12. 2n sn+1 s 7. sin(at) s2 +a2 2as cos(at) tcos(at) 2 9. 11. 13. 15. 17. 19. 21. 23. 25. 27. 29. 31. 33. 35. 37. s2 +a2 s2 -a2 (s2 +a2) (s2 +a2) 2as2 sin(at)+atcos(at) 2 (s2 +a2) s(s2 -a2) cos(at)-atsin(at) 2 14. s(s2 +3a2) cos(at)+atsin(at) 2 (s2 +a2) sin(at+b) ssin(b)+acos(b) 16. (s2 +a2) scos(b)-asin(b) s2 +a2 sinh(at) a 18. cos(at+b) cosh(at) s eat sin(bt) eat sinh (bt ) tneat, n=1,2,3,K u (t)=u(t-c) b s-a 2 20. eat cos(bt) 2 s2 -a2 s2 +a2 s2 -a2 (s-a) +b2 (s-a) +b2 b s-a 22. 24. F(s) ts0s eat cosh (bt ) f (ct ) 2 (s-a) -b2 n! (s-a)n+1 2 (s-a) -b2 1 Êsˆ c F Á c ̃ 26. u (t)f (t-c) e-csF(s) 28. u (t)g(t) c e-cs s d (t - c) Dirac Delta Function Ë ̄ e-cs Heaviside Function cc ectf(t) F(s-c) 30. tnf(t), n=1,2,3,K e-csL{g(t+c)} (-1)nF(n)(s) 1 f (t) Ú• F(u)du 32. Út f (v)dv Út 0 f (t-t)g(t)dt f¢(t) f(n)(t) F(s)G(s) sF(s)- f (0) 34. f (t+T)= f (t) 36. f¢(t) ÚT e-st f (t)dt 0 1-e-sT s2F(s)-sf (0)- f¢(0) snF(s)-sn-1 f (0)-sn-2 f¢(0)L-sf(n-2)(0)- f(n-1)(0) Table Notes 1. This list is not a complete listing of Laplace transforms and only contains some of the more commonly used Laplace transforms and formulas. 2. Recall the definition of hyperbolic functions. et +e-t et -e-t cosh(t)= 2 sinh(t)= 2 3. Be careful when using “normal” trig function vs. hyperbolic functions. The only difference in the formulas is the “+ a2” for the “normal” trig functions becomes a “- a2” for the hyperbolic functions! 4. Formula #4 uses the Gamma function which is defined as G(t)=Ú•e-xxt-1 dx 0 If n is a positive integer then, G(n+1)= n! The Gamma function is an extension of the normal factorial function. Here are a couple of quick facts for the Gamma function G(p+1)= pG(p) p(p+1)(p+2)L(p+n-1)= G(p+n) G(p) GÊ1ˆ= p Á ̃ Ë2 ̄ therefore, 2+2=4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Does 2+2 always equal 4? Please explain and show your work. Not on an old Pentium chip, it doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optometric Insight Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 only if Big Brother wants us to think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 I can appreciate you gentlemen (and I use that term loosely) making conclusory statements that 2+2 should always equal 4, but there have to be instances where the equation can equal something other than 4...I don't buy the simple explanation as you were taught in 2nd grade. Polls are not appropriate because you need to show your work...where the heck is OCinBuffalo or DCTom?? I want to see a proof. !@#$ing lawyers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Not in new math Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 only if Big Brother wants us to think so What does a reality show on CBS have to do with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted July 8, 2014 Author Share Posted July 8, 2014 http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/pdf/Laplace_Table.pdf There is an error in your proof...I'll let you find it. Not on an old Pentium chip, it doesn't. I always figured you for a slide rule. !@#$ing lawyers. I don't think anyone can disprove that theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optometric Insight Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 What does a reality show on CBS have to do with this? I was more referring to 1984 by George Orwell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 I don't know about 2 + 2, but I did have a professor in Engineering school provide proof that women are evil. It was derived like this: I think we'd all agree that being with a women is a product of time and money (vis-a-vis, nobody that is too broke or too busy can court a women), therefore: Women = Time x Money And as we all know, Time IS Money, therefore: Women = Money x Money = (Money)^2 I'm sure you've all heard that "Money is the root of evil", therefore (If Money = [Evil]^[1/2]): Women = ([Evil]^[1/2])^2 Women = Evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts