Jump to content

EJ Manuel Stat line compared to ??


Markjaro

Recommended Posts

So, I was thinking that EJ while showing glimpses of talent had been disappointing in some areas so far this year. This of course was a somewhat subjective response to his performance so far. I mean it's a team sport with lots of variables beyond the QBs control. So I pulled up another very good QBs stats for his first five games to compare. Here they are:

 

(From ?QB's first five games according to ESPN's player game log)

 

Game 1 - loss - 21/37 302 yds 56.8 % 1 td 3 int 58.6 RAT

Game 2 - loss - 21/33 188 yds 63.6 % 1 td 3 int 51.1 RAT

Game 3 - loss - 20/44 193 yds 45.5% 0 td 2 int 39.3 RAT

Game 4 - loss - 19/32 309 yds 59.4 % 1 td 3 int 63.2 RAT

Game 5 - win - 12/23 137 yds 52.2 % 1 td 1 int 66.8 RAT

Totals 1-4 - 93/169 1129 yds 55% 4 td 12 int 55.8 RAT

 

 

EJ's first five games according to ESPN's player game log)

Game 1 - loss - 18/27 150 yds 66.7 % 2 td 0 int 105.5 RAT

Game 2 - win - 27/39 296 yds 69.2 % 1 td 1 int 89.3 RAT

Game 3 - loss - 19/42 243 yds 45.2% 1 td 0 int 71.8 RAT

Game 4 - win - 10/22 167 yds 45.5 % 1 td 2 int 48.9 RAT

Game 5 – loss - 11/20 129 yds 55.0 % 0 td 0 int 74.8 RAT

Totals 2-3 - 85/150 985 yds 56.7% 5 td 3 int 79.4 RAT

 

Any guesses as to who ?QB is? I am not so disappointed anymore.....Good luck Thad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hackett says Lewis learned a lot by helping him out in the booth during games. I wonder if EJ will be up with Hackett, picking his brain, watching defenses from a different perspective. Hanging out with Hackett could be instructional for EJ.

 

Yes they said EJ will be in the booth with Hackett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hackett says Lewis learned a lot by helping him out in the booth during games. I wonder if EJ will be up with Hackett, picking his brain, watching defenses from a different perspective. Hanging out with Hackett could be instructional for EJ.

I sure hope so. Maybe Hackett is a better teacher than game planner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I was thinking that EJ while showing glimpses of talent had been disappointing in some areas so far this year. This of course was a somewhat subjective response to his performance so far. I mean it's a team sport with lots of variables beyond the QBs control. So I pulled up another very good QBs stats for his first five games to compare. Here they are:

 

(From ?QB's first five games according to ESPN's player game log)

 

Game 1 - loss - 21/37 302 yds 56.8 % 1 td 3 int 58.6 RAT

Game 2 - loss - 21/33 188 yds 63.6 % 1 td 3 int 51.1 RAT

Game 3 - loss - 20/44 193 yds 45.5% 0 td 2 int 39.3 RAT

Game 4 - loss - 19/32 309 yds 59.4 % 1 td 3 int 63.2 RAT

Game 5 - win - 12/23 137 yds 52.2 % 1 td 1 int 66.8 RAT

Totals 1-4 - 93/169 1129 yds 55% 4 td 12 int 55.8 RAT

 

 

EJ's first five games according to ESPN's player game log)

Game 1 - loss - 18/27 150 yds 66.7 % 2 td 0 int 105.5 RAT

Game 2 - win - 27/39 296 yds 69.2 % 1 td 1 int 89.3 RAT

Game 3 - loss - 19/42 243 yds 45.2% 1 td 0 int 71.8 RAT

Game 4 - win - 10/22 167 yds 45.5 % 1 td 2 int 48.9 RAT

Game 5 – loss - 11/20 129 yds 55.0 % 0 td 0 int 74.8 RAT

Totals 2-3 - 85/150 985 yds 56.7% 5 td 3 int 79.4 RAT

 

Any guesses as to who ?QB is? I am not so disappointed anymore.....Good luck Thad...

 

You can find similar 1st 5 game stat lines for a number of rookie QB. Having a poor to mediocre 1st season is not atypical of rookies, even promising rookies.

The real question is what does the 2nd and 3rd season and beyond look like?

 

You wind up with players like Bradford, Stafford, and Freeman who have been playing in the league 3-4 years and you're not seeing the improvement and consistency you'd like, then it's a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I was thinking that EJ while showing glimpses of talent had been disappointing in some areas so far this year. This of course was a somewhat subjective response to his performance so far. I mean it's a team sport with lots of variables beyond the QBs control. So I pulled up another very good QBs stats for his first five games to compare. Here they are:

 

(From ?QB's first five games according to ESPN's player game log)

 

Game 1 - loss - 21/37 302 yds 56.8 % 1 td 3 int 58.6 RAT

Game 2 - loss - 21/33 188 yds 63.6 % 1 td 3 int 51.1 RAT

Game 3 - loss - 20/44 193 yds 45.5% 0 td 2 int 39.3 RAT

Game 4 - loss - 19/32 309 yds 59.4 % 1 td 3 int 63.2 RAT

Game 5 - win - 12/23 137 yds 52.2 % 1 td 1 int 66.8 RAT

Totals 1-4 - 93/169 1129 yds 55% 4 td 12 int 55.8 RAT

 

 

EJ's first five games according to ESPN's player game log)

Game 1 - loss - 18/27 150 yds 66.7 % 2 td 0 int 105.5 RAT

Game 2 - win - 27/39 296 yds 69.2 % 1 td 1 int 89.3 RAT

Game 3 - loss - 19/42 243 yds 45.2% 1 td 0 int 71.8 RAT

Game 4 - win - 10/22 167 yds 45.5 % 1 td 2 int 48.9 RAT

Game 5 – loss - 11/20 129 yds 55.0 % 0 td 0 int 74.8 RAT

Totals 2-3 - 85/150 985 yds 56.7% 5 td 3 int 79.4 RAT

 

Any guesses as to who ?QB is? I am not so disappointed anymore.....Good luck Thad...

It's such a different game now than it was in 1998 (let alone 1988). The game is so incredibly tailored to help the offensive players now that you simply don't see more than a few QB's throw more INT's than TD's in a season. Jim Kelly threw more INT's than TD's in 1988 when the Bills went 12-4. I remember when 3,000 yards was a milestone. Now if you start 16 games and don't throw for 3,000 yards, you're gonna be out of a job. Completion percentages are way up too. It's a different era man, you're talking about apples and oranges. Also, if EJ Manuel wasn't playing the most conservative brand of QB'ing I've ever seen, he would have thrown a few more INT's himself. Edited by metzelaars_lives
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's such a different game now than it was in 1998 (let alone 1988). The game is so incredibly tailored to help the offensive players now that you simply don't see more than a few QB's throw more INT's than TD's in a season.

 

Andrew Luck wasn't great through 5 games last season either. Indy was 2-3 while Luck had 7TDs and 7 INTs with a completion percentage of 53.4%.

 

The difference is that the Colts let Luck go out there and chuck it. Unlike the other rookie QBs who got scaled back versions of their offense, Luck got the entire thing and they let him struggle and make mistakes. They weren't afraid of losing games and it helped develop his game quicker.

 

As others have pointed out in other threads R. Wilson's numbers are very similar to EJ too and that's a better comparison because he got a scaled back version of their offense as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew Luck wasn't great through 5 games last season either. Indy was 2-3 while Luck had 7TDs and 7 INTs with a completion percentage of 53.4%.

 

The difference is that the Colts let Luck go out there and chuck it. Unlike the other rookie QBs who got scaled back versions of their offense, Luck got the entire thing and they let him struggle and make mistakes. They weren't afraid of losing games and it helped develop his game quicker.

 

As others have pointed out in other threads R. Wilson's numbers are very similar to EJ too and that's a better comparison because he got a scaled back version of their offense as well.

I agree with everything you say here. Read my entire post, I basically say the same thing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, those are Peyton manning's first five games. I agree, you can't really make too much out of the stat lines this early on, but that was exactly my point to begin with.

Great job by Thad Lewis today though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hackett says Lewis learned a lot by helping him out in the booth during games. I wonder if EJ will be up with Hackett, picking his brain, watching defenses from a different perspective. Hanging out with Hackett could be instructional for EJ.

 

Being on the field is the only place to be. In the game. Being in the booth is useless. Theres no positive spin on ej missing time.

 

Correct me if im wrong but ej was also in booth after cleveland injury and he waz horrible in pitt game when he came back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...