Jump to content

Poll: Should the "Redskins" name be changed?

Just in Atlanta

By Just in Atlanta
in Off the Wall Archives

 Share

Redskins Name Change  

539 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the "Redskins" name be changed?

    • Yes. It's a derogatory word and the NFL should set a good example.
      169
    • No. It's not derogatory to most people and changing it would set a bad example.
      302
    • Maybe. I don't have a strong opinion but I wouldn't be fazed by a name change.
      68

  2. 2. How many of the following statements capture your views?

    • It's insensitive to have a team name that denotes skin color.
      150
    • I'm deeply offended; it's borderline bigotry.
      51
    • It's a politically-correct manufactured controversy.
      182
    • Another example of a select "offended" few forcing their PC views on everyone.
      177
    • The term doesn't bother me but it is offensive to many others.
      135
    • I value tradition in this debate.
      105
    • Why is this even an issue?
      229

Recommended Posts

BillsWatch Veteran

BillsWatch

Posted
Posted

Macho guys? Native Americans?

 

This guy (far left) has no issue with the DC football team name....

 

large_village%20people.png

 

What do the New England Patriots* fan club have to do with poll?

Just because the guy on the left dresses up like some Boston Tea Party participant does not relate to thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 851
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...
26CornerBlitz Hall of Famer

26CornerBlitz

Posted
Posted (edited)

Redskins Hall of Famers say team should consider name change: http://tracking.si.c...er-name-change/

 

http://www.wtop.com/...in-on-team-name

 

Pro Football Hall of Famers, wide receiver Art Monk and cornerback Darrell Green, said that the team should talk about the controversy and consider a name change.

 

Monk, who set an NFL record for most catches in a season with 106 and helped lead the Redskins to three Super Bowl victories, says the team should consider a name change.

"[if] Native Americans feel like Redskins or the Chiefs or [another] name is offensive to them, then who are we to say to them 'No, it's not'?" Monk says.

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joe Miner Veteran

Joe Miner

Posted
Posted
Redskins Hall of Famers say team should consider name change: http://tracking.si.c...er-name-change/

 

http://www.wtop.com/...in-on-team-name

 

Pro Football Hall of Famers, wide receiver Art Monk and cornerback Darrell Green, said that the team should talk about the controversy and consider a name change.

 

Monk, who set an NFL record for most catches in a season with 106 and helped lead the Redskins to three Super Bowl victories, says the team should consider a name change.

"[if] Native Americans feel like Redskins or the Chiefs or [another] name is offensive to them, then who are we to say to them 'No, it's not'?" Monk says.

 

At what point does this qualify as crusading?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
SBUffalo RFA

SBUffalo

Posted
Posted

They've had the name for a while. What took you so long to stop using it?

 

Because you never really think about things like that when it's a nationally renowned sports franchise. It's not something that crosses your mind until it's pointed out to you. That name is 100% racist, without a doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KD in CA Hall of Famer

KD in CA

Posted
Posted

Because you never really think about things like that when it's a nationally renowned sports franchise. It's not something that crosses your mind until it's pointed out to you. That name is 100% racist, without a doubt.

 

You're that sensitive about it and yet it needed to be pointed out to you after decades of use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NoSaint Hall of Famer

NoSaint

Posted
Posted

 

 

The majority of Native Americans don't even consider it to be an offensive team name. See link

 

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/05/29/retired-native-american-chief-would-be-offended-if-redskins-did-change-name/

 

It is considered racist by pretentious and overly PC individuals like YOU, DStebb716.

 

i dont remember - is this the guy the redskins interviewed on one of their tv shows that claimed to be a chief but turned out just to be some convicted felon that was like a quarter native american and had no ties to any tribe?

 

or did they find a legit guy for this one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PromoTheRobot Hall of Famer

PromoTheRobot

Posted
Posted (edited)

The majority of Native Americans don't even consider it to be an offensive team name. See link

 

http://washington.cb...id-change-name/

 

It is considered racist by pretentious and overly PC individuals like YOU, DStebb716.

 

Well if that one guy says so...

 

Maybe they can build a dome and call it "the Teepee?"

 

PTR

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
John in Jax Veteran

John in Jax

Posted
Posted (edited)
Edit: And on the team name front...this is the only one that I think we can be pretty united is unreasonable. Indians, Braves, etc fall near the Buccaneers, Cowboys, Rangers category, and aren't inherently offensive in themselves. The Washington football team however chooses a racist pejorative that borders on the N-word, and to me remains a negative mark on the franchise and the NFL.

 

LOL. I guess it's true what they say, "if you live long enough, you'll see (or hear) just about everything." You may have missed what was pointed out just a few posts above yours.....a MAJORITY of Indians don't even think it's offensive. Political correctness, and the feeling of "that's offensive to me", has made this country a much worse place than it used to be.

 

ETA: Notwithstanding the linked article in this forum showing that Indians are OK with "Redskins", there have been many other polls showing the same thing too. OBVIOUSLY, if "Redskins" was anywhere near to as offensive as "the N word", the name would have been changed LONG ago.

Edited by John in Jax
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dave mcbride Hall of Famer

dave mcbride

Posted
Posted

Okay here is a more formal "scientific study" for you. Included is the methodology, sampling error, etc.

 

http://www.annenberg...ns_09-24_pr.pdf

 

Damn libs...

 

If there's one thing I hate, it's "Majority" individuals trying to be the voice of the Minority, instead of letting the minority individual speak for himself.

 

Interestingly, I never said that Native Americans were opposed to the name. Rather, I implied that relying on an anecdote to make a statistically significant point wasn't really acceptable. The Annenberg survey is certainly acceptable -- they're an excellent organization. I wonder how much has changed since the poll was taken in 2004, however. As far as I can tell, no credible polls have been taken in the last year or two. Maybe the numbers will be the same as before, but perhaps not give the increasing degree of controversy surrounding the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...