Toshiero Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 While it doesn't necessarily mean anything, outside of perhaps some of the jumping ability and reach, I love this stuff. He'd be a great pick at 10. http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7776652 Good pick if we knew he could stay off the booze. So if he was having issues in College, what is going to happen when he has first round money and living the NFL player lifestyle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 5, 2012 Author Share Posted April 5, 2012 Good pick if we knew he could stay off the booze. So if he was having issues in College, what is going to happen when he has first round money and living the NFL player lifestyle? Zima. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Zima. He'll play for the Patriots? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 That catching radius stuff is very important, especially with a QB like Fitz who takes a lot of chances. Not a big fan of Floyd, but starting to come around a bit. Just don't think he's very explosive or a big play guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 That catching radius stuff is very important, especially with a QB like Fitz who takes a lot of chances. Not a big fan of Floyd, but starting to come around a bit. Just don't think he's very explosive or a big play guy. Floyd is not Desean Jackson explosive, but he does have good speed to outrun defenders. He also, @ 224lbs., likes to run over people from time to time. Not to mention he has great agility in the open field for a guy his size. If we get Floyd he will not disappoint the masses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPS Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 That catching radius stuff is very important, especially with a QB like Fitz who takes a lot of chances. Not a big fan of Floyd, but starting to come around a bit. Just don't think he's very explosive or a big play guy. Not to repeatedly beat a dead horse to death, but, what was Parrish's catching radius? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I usually like the sport science segment, but that one was weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voodoo poonani Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 If Floyd isn't available, we should have a shot at Kirkpatrick who allowed only one touchdown in his career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deep2evans Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 i'm getting to point where i'll be pissed if we take anyone else. riley reiff? a guy who most aren't even sold on as a left tackle?? at 10!!?!? absolute crazy talk. give your QB a weapon to throw to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobillies Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Not to repeatedly beat a dead horse to death, but, what was Parrish's catching radius? not sure but floyd could probably eat parrish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awwufelloff Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Really hope we take this guy! Be an amazing addition next to Stevie! Nice 1 2 punch. He has the size to break tackles after the catch, something Stevie is not the greatest at. Stevie is a great route runner however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureBillsGM Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 What has suddenly happened that everyone is forecasting Adams to us in the 2nd? From verything I have read, he won't last past Pittsburgh in the 1st as they are completely in love with him but most don't think he will last that long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjmac Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Not just draft an OT but draft him for DEPTH! Use out 10th pick for DEPTH at the OT position! ... Was preach about Floyd when people was posting Upshaw before free-agency....he was the only reason I watched Norte Dame football this year and hardly ever dissapointed...and our QB needs a play maker at wr more than a back up OT Agreed. Even 1st-round tackles take time to develop, so why not grab a playmaker in round 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 No disrespect to the OP, but these Sports Science segments are useless. They offer very little relevant information. "He taps his toes on the sideline with 50 lbs of force which is less than 23% of his total body weight." So what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EldaBillsFan Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 No disrespect to the OP, but these Sports Science segments are useless. They offer very little relevant information. "He taps his toes on the sideline with 50 lbs of force which is less than 23% of his total body weight." So what? A sprinter is taught to run light, it speaks to their body control Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 He really makes the most sense @10 if he is there. We need a star player who can either put up points or have huge impact on the D. Now that Bell is gone, yes we need a LT, I will be upset if we grab one at #10 and pass on a playmaker like Floyd. All along, I have said he is who I would pick at 10, read up on the kid. Gets up high at the goal line and can grab the ball. He doesn't have breakaway speed, so what; he has everything else. I just worry that Jax or Miami might grab him. Hopefully the Phins Love Tannenhill and grab him; hopefully the Jags go D or take someone like Reiff. I can't wait for the draft! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roccitybillsfan Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I heard Polian on Sirius last week. He was saying...with a pick this high...you take someone who gets touchdowns or hits the qb. You never take a guard, and only take a franchise type tackle ( not a pretty good one that should really go in the 20s). We took a real franchise OT a while back (big Mike)...but that was just unlucky...not a bad pick at the time...really a no brainier. In this draft kalil may be worthy...but none of the others (at 10). Pick the playmaker at 10, or an impact defensive player if he's gone...and get the OT later ( with Hairston penciled in as the Guy). Kalil somehow drops...then do it. What he said..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Plus you know how Gaily like his play-making toys on offense...Say hello to Floyd in the first, LT Adams in the second... That would be a dream come true draft..! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 No disrespect to the OP, but these Sports Science segments are useless. They offer very little relevant information. "He taps his toes on the sideline with 50 lbs of force which is less than 23% of his total body weight." So what? He's a bit "light in the loafers?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 6, 2012 Share Posted April 6, 2012 He may be the pick, but i can gaurantee you if you asked Buddy Nix if he saw Sports Science, he would tell you "we didnt have that course when i went to college". Btw, did Buddy go to Notre Dames Pro Day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.529869a0a9afd197241cad0932282c97.jpg)
Recommended Posts