Jump to content

B Schottenheimer declines interview


FluffHead

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not for nothing, but aside from being employed by the team for like 10 months - Nix was an outsider. He was only here for the 2009 season...I do agree it would have been nice to see us interview people from other teams who had no or very little ties to us, but during the decade of disgrace - Nix had nothing to do with us and well..he found some awesome players for SD. Would anyones opinion change if he had not been employed with us during 2009 and then hired after? My point is is that I think most would have said, yeah he's old but he has a good track record of finding great players and in his presser he said a lot of things that the fans have been wanting. Just becuase he was employed by the bills for 10 months out of 10 years doesn't make him an "insider"...

 

Alan Wilson even mentioned that Modrak wanted Cushing over Maybin. John Guy has even been on the record as saying that he provides recommendations and it is up to others within the organization to decide who they want to pursue and how much to offer (I cannot believe I am standing up for these two). It just really makes me realize that there is more to the picture than we care to believe. TD was an atrosicous GM/president, Marv was over his head as GM. We didn't draft great players with Williams, Mularkey or Jauron. I think there are lots of things that factor into someone's decision to come here or not to come here. TD made a lot of bone headed decisions and deserved to get shi*t canned. Marv went with a consensus approach to drafting and the results were about the same as the TD era. I think one thing that may have happened was that during this time too much final say was given to the HC. Marv was an HC and much like Parcells and other HCs want to be able to have a say as to who is on their team. After Marv, I am sure the same process went on and DJ most likely had final say. I find myself wondering how much of this decade is TD, Marv's and DJs fault and not so much of poor recommendations by Modrak and Guy. RW was the common denominator, but honestly how much say did he really have???

 

One thing I do want to toss in about B. Schotty is that I am not sure how I feel about a young and hungry up and coming coordinator, the kid is 36 yrs old and what exactly has he accomplished over a period of time either playing or coaching? Yes his father is a great regular season coach, but what has this kid done? I feel the same way about McDermott in Philly...I do not want Frazier, I am sick of a player's coach and someone who is Dungy/Jauron like laid-back. Russ Grimm is a more interesting choice, he has played on 3 SB teams, was a finalist for the Steelers job and has a good track record in coaching as well...Oh yeah he is a finalist for the HOF for thr 4th time...I think I just figured out who I would like to see as our coach...

It's not wrong to stand up for either of those guys. I honestly think that a lot of the advice they give isn't followed. As for Guy, the free agents they've brought in and the trades they've made in the last 2 years have been successful (Fitz is a quality backup; Hangartner; Stroud; Drayton Florence). I don't give Guy credit for TO since I suspect that was a marketing decision. I gather he wanted L. Coles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would he have interviewed for the carolina job if that was open or seattle if asked or washington? How bout a really good team if they had an opening? If you can reasonablly guess "no" to these questions, then your point is valid but I'm betting you can't.

 

 

Would I have married Heidi Klum if I met here before Seal? Or Adrianna Lima if she didn't meet that d-bag basketball player?

 

Speculation is stupid IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't speak for anyone else, but I have a feeling people not being enamored of Leslie Frazier is because he's a Tampa-2 disciple. Say hello to corners playing 15 yards off the line of scrimmage. We been dealing with the craptastic defense for 4 years now, and people don't want any more of it. Tampa 2 is awesome of you're a dome team or a warm weather team...which we're not.

As I've stated elsewhere, there's really no evidence that he's a "disciple" of the Cover 2. He ran a different defense in Cincy, was an integral part of Buddy Ryan's 46 D in 1985, and coached under Jim Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well B. Schottenheimer is aware he will be a hotter commodity the longer the Jets are in the playoffs. The Bills have gone through Phillips, Williams, Mularkey and Jauron in relatively short order. We will be losing major players to free agency, its unclear where the power for drafting and personnel will be, and the Bills owner is not long for this world and the then the new folks may move the franchise. I think B Shotts is waiting for an offer from a more viable franchise.

When you look around what openings do you see? If there were a couple I might agree with you, but there aren't.

 

What he should know...strike while the iron is hot cause this year's wunderkind coordinator is next year's also ran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see, they interviewed Frazier, wanted to talk to Schottenheimer, want to talk to Grimm ... doesn't seem like a ridiculous amount of obstruction taking place. Add that teams can be asked for permission to interview coaches during the playoffs and this argument is rather wobbly.

 

Right, but even if Schottenheimer was the #1 guy that we wanted, this is the first week that we can interview him. So while we are going down the list, of Shotty Jr. was the #1 guy (which he wasn't, i hope), we still couldn't have interviewed him till this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would I have married Heidi Klum if I met here before Seal? Or Adrianna Lima if she didn't meet that d-bag basketball player?

 

Speculation is stupid IMO.

the difference is that some speculation is so wild that it borders on ridiculous and some isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not wrong to stand up for either of those guys. I honestly think that a lot of the advice they give isn't followed. As for Guy, the free agents they've brought in and the trades they've made in the last 2 years have been successful (Fitz is a quality backup; Hangartner; Stroud; Drayton Florence). I don't give Guy credit for TO since I suspect that was a marketing decision. I gather he wanted L. Coles.

 

I know it's not wrong, but really just taking a step back and looking at the entire picture; I do really wonder "who" is to blame. We all know that Modrak did a really good job in Philly - I have no clue what Guy's past has been like. When TD was here, we all know that he was King Tut and made all the decisions. My feeling on Marv is that he let the coach make a lot of calls and I suspect that the same philosphy carried through...

 

I am sure this will be different with Nix, but we really need to find an HC that believes in building a team the way Nix wants to. I only see 2 candidates right now that would fit that picture...Cowher and Grimm. Dumping the Tampa 2 and instally a 3-4 or even a 4-3 will require a bit of an overhaul in defensive talent. If we are having trouble filling the HC positions, imagine what it's going to be like to get FAs to come here to overhaul the defense...I know this is a terrible comparison, but hell I tried to do this on Madden and doing things the "right" way as if it was the real world still took me 2 seasons to switch the D and I didn't do much to the Offense. Part of me thinks that the FO may know this and may go with Frazier to keep the Tampa - 2 and rebuild the O to get us competitive...and then the wheels will spin and spin for 3 or 4 years and we decide to dump Frazier and switch Defensive schemes. Hiring a Cowher or a Grimm type of HC will set us back a couple of seasons if we decide to overhaul the D and how much will we have to overpay FAs to come here?? Even if we havea 2 or 3 great drafts, there is still a long way to go with a non-Tampa 2 coach...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, but even if Schottenheimer was the #1 guy that we wanted, this is the first week that we can interview him. So while we are going down the list, of Shotty Jr. was the #1 guy (which he wasn't, i hope), we still couldn't have interviewed him till this weekend.

Suffices to say that when the Bills start calling college coaches, position coaches, CFL coaches, that they are working their way DOWN and not up -- hence the optimism that another coordinator turned the Bills down is "wonderful news" is nothing more than floating another half-filled hope balloon in the storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why hasn't Cowher officially said no??? why is so easy for Schott jr and Shanahan??

 

Has shefter spoken with Cowher?? has anyone?? why doesn't he be the one to end the speculation - what's he waiting for?

 

He wants to say No specifically to the Buffalo Bills and possibly the Raiders. But he wants the rest of the NFL to know that he is available. He's just being classy about the whole thing and not coming out and saying it.

 

If he did say "No", the assumption might be that he's not available to coach at all in 2010. That is clearly not the case.

 

Right now, I'd settle for Eric Taylor.

 

C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not wrong, but really just taking a step back and looking at the entire picture; I do really wonder "who" is to blame. We all know that Modrak did a really good job in Philly - I have no clue what Guy's past has been like. When TD was here, we all know that he was King Tut and made all the decisions. My feeling on Marv is that he let the coach make a lot of calls and I suspect that the same philosphy carried through...

 

I am sure this will be different with Nix, but we really need to find an HC that believes in building a team the way Nix wants to. I only see 2 candidates right now that would fit that picture...Cowher and Grimm. Dumping the Tampa 2 and instally a 3-4 or even a 4-3 will require a bit of an overhaul in defensive talent. If we are having trouble filling the HC positions, imagine what it's going to be like to get FAs to come here to overhaul the defense...I know this is a terrible comparison, but hell I tried to do this on Madden and doing things the "right" way as if it was the real world still took me 2 seasons to switch the D and I didn't do much to the Offense. Part of me thinks that the FO may know this and may go with Frazier to keep the Tampa - 2 and rebuild the O to get us competitive...and then the wheels will spin and spin for 3 or 4 years and we decide to dump Frazier and switch Defensive schemes. Hiring a Cowher or a Grimm type of HC will set us back a couple of seasons if we decide to overhaul the D and how much will we have to overpay FAs to come here?? Even if we havea 2 or 3 great drafts, there is still a long way to go with a non-Tampa 2 coach...

If you see it as a 3 or 4 year job to correct the last 4 or 5 years of blunders, and the owner is a frail 91 year old, do you want to put your name, effort, and heart next to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not wrong, but really just taking a step back and looking at the entire picture; I do really wonder "who" is to blame. We all know that Modrak did a really good job in Philly - I have no clue what Guy's past has been like. When TD was here, we all know that he was King Tut and made all the decisions. My feeling on Marv is that he let the coach make a lot of calls and I suspect that the same philosphy carried through...

 

I am sure this will be different with Nix, but we really need to find an HC that believes in building a team the way Nix wants to. I only see 2 candidates right now that would fit that picture...Cowher and Grimm. Dumping the Tampa 2 and instally a 3-4 or even a 4-3 will require a bit of an overhaul in defensive talent. If we are having trouble filling the HC positions, imagine what it's going to be like to get FAs to come here to overhaul the defense...I know this is a terrible comparison, but hell I tried to do this on Madden and doing things the "right" way as if it was the real world still took me 2 seasons to switch the D and I didn't do much to the Offense. Part of me thinks that the FO may know this and may go with Frazier to keep the Tampa - 2 and rebuild the O to get us competitive...and then the wheels will spin and spin for 3 or 4 years and we decide to dump Frazier and switch Defensive schemes. Hiring a Cowher or a Grimm type of HC will set us back a couple of seasons if we decide to overhaul the D and how much will we have to overpay FAs to come here?? Even if we havea 2 or 3 great drafts, there is still a long way to go with a non-Tampa 2 coach...

 

Cowher would attract FOs to Buffalo and quality DC to design/implement the 3-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has he refused to interview because hes trying to stay focused on the playoffs or refused to consider our HC position??? Remember less than a week ago it was claimed Grimm refused an interview as well.

 

Will we let the damn process work itself out instead of reacting to ever Schecter report?????

 

i came in here to ask the same thing. i have to imagine this is more along the lines of wanting to keep himself and his players focused on the task at hand. i hope so at least.

 

to answer your last question, i think you know better than to expect patience and rational from this board. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not wrong, but really just taking a step back and looking at the entire picture; I do really wonder "who" is to blame. We all know that Modrak did a really good job in Philly - I have no clue what Guy's past has been like. When TD was here, we all know that he was King Tut and made all the decisions. My feeling on Marv is that he let the coach make a lot of calls and I suspect that the same philosphy carried through...

 

I am sure this will be different with Nix, but we really need to find an HC that believes in building a team the way Nix wants to. I only see 2 candidates right now that would fit that picture...Cowher and Grimm. Dumping the Tampa 2 and instally a 3-4 or even a 4-3 will require a bit of an overhaul in defensive talent. If we are having trouble filling the HC positions, imagine what it's going to be like to get FAs to come here to overhaul the defense...I know this is a terrible comparison, but hell I tried to do this on Madden and doing things the "right" way as if it was the real world still took me 2 seasons to switch the D and I didn't do much to the Offense. Part of me thinks that the FO may know this and may go with Frazier to keep the Tampa - 2 and rebuild the O to get us competitive...and then the wheels will spin and spin for 3 or 4 years and we decide to dump Frazier and switch Defensive schemes. Hiring a Cowher or a Grimm type of HC will set us back a couple of seasons if we decide to overhaul the D and how much will we have to overpay FAs to come here?? Even if we havea 2 or 3 great drafts, there is still a long way to go with a non-Tampa 2 coach...

As I said above and elsewhere, it's not apparent to me that Frazier is wedded to the Tampa 2. He walked into a situation in Minnesota with two dominating DTs and the best tackling corner in the league. Then they traded for the best pass rushing DE in the league. Seems to me that it makes sense to run the Tampa 2.

 

As for the Tampa 2, it's a perfectly good defense if it has the right people. The Bills don't have have the right people for it except for in the secondary, but that just begs the question of how the Bills' unit would look if it ran another system. The 46: with those crappy LBs? The 3-4: Exactly who would play nose? Given the Bills talent level, the Tampa 2 was most likely the best scheme for them the past couple of years. People get waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too hung up on scheme labels. Look at the players, folks. Give a good coach good players, and they'll be fine regardless of scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you see it as a 3 or 4 year job to correct the last 4 or 5 years of blunders, and the owner is a frail 91 year old, do you want to put your name, effort, and heart next to it?

 

Not without some serious cash and a commitment to change and words to that effect would be escape clauses in my contract... :thumbsup:

 

To switch D schemes and having FAs willing to sign resonable contracts over the next 2-3 seasons...I would guess we are at least 4 years out (along with strong drafts) of being a contender..Yes we have some pieces, but to overhaul an entire defensive system and fix the OL and WR and QB issues...you are talking about 4 good drafts and at least 2 good FA periods...

 

Keep the Tampa-2 and fix the offense, 2 seasons would get us to the playoffs would be my guess and that is about it...we won't go much further...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowher would attract FOs to Buffalo and quality DC to design/implement the 3-4

 

Yes he would...provided the purse strings open up...

 

You are looking at probably at least 4 years before the pieces are there and they are able to play cohesively...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not for nothing, but aside from being employed by the team for like 10 months - Nix was an outsider. He was only here for the 2009 season...I do agree it would have been nice to see us interview people from other teams who had no or very little ties to us, but during the decade of disgrace - Nix had nothing to do with us and well..he found some awesome players for SD. Would anyones opinion change if he had not been employed with us during 2009 and then hired after? My point is is that I think most would have said, yeah he's old but he has a good track record of finding great players and in his presser he said a lot of things that the fans have been wanting. Just becuase he was employed by the bills for 10 months out of 10 years doesn't make him an "insider"...

 

Alan Wilson even mentioned that Modrak wanted Cushing over Maybin. John Guy has even been on the record as saying that he provides recommendations and it is up to others within the organization to decide who they want to pursue and how much to offer (I cannot believe I am standing up for these two). It just really makes me realize that there is more to the picture than we care to believe. TD was an atrosicous GM/president, Marv was over his head as GM. We didn't draft great players with Williams, Mularkey or Jauron. I think there are lots of things that factor into someone's decision to come here or not to come here. TD made a lot of bone headed decisions and deserved to get shi*t canned. Marv went with a consensus approach to drafting and the results were about the same as the TD era. I think one thing that may have happened was that during this time too much final say was given to the HC. Marv was an HC and much like Parcells and other HCs want to be able to have a say as to who is on their team. After Marv, I am sure the same process went on and DJ most likely had final say. I find myself wondering how much of this decade is TD, Marv's and DJs fault and not so much of poor recommendations by Modrak and Guy. RW was the common denominator, but honestly how much say did he really have???

 

One thing I do want to toss in about B. Schotty is that I am not sure how I feel about a young and hungry up and coming coordinator, the kid is 36 yrs old and what exactly has he accomplished over a period of time either playing or coaching? Yes his father is a great regular season coach, but what has this kid done? I feel the same way about McDermott in Philly...I do not want Frazier, I am sick of a player's coach and someone who is Dungy/Jauron like laid-back; plus the Tampa 2 needs to go out the door. Russ Grimm is a more interesting choice, he has played on 3 SB teams, was a finalist for the Steelers job and has a good track record in coaching as well...Oh yeah he is a finalist for the HOF for thr 4th time...I think I just figured out who I would like to see as our coach...

 

On the point about Nix, personally I wonder if the Bills didn't bring him at the beginning of this past season with the expectation of elevating him to GM. It gives RW the chance to see if he fit his idea of GM without giving him the title upfront. It also would explain why Guy was the only other candidate interviewed (Rooney Rule).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said above and elsewhere, it's not apparent to me that Frazier is wedded to the Tampa 2. He walked into a situation in Minnesota with two dominating DTs and the best tackling corner in the league. Then they traded for the best pass rushing DE in the league. Seems to me that it makes sense to run the Tampa 2.

 

As for the Tampa 2, it's a perfectly good defense if it has the right people. The Bills don't have have the right people for it except for in the secondary, but that just begs the question of how the Bills' unit would look if it ran another system. The 46: with those crappy LBs? The 3-4: Exactly who would play nose? Given the Bills talent level, the Tampa 2 was most likely the best scheme for them the past couple of years. People get waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too hung up on scheme labels. Look at the players, folks. Give a good coach good players, and they'll be fine regardless of scheme.

 

I can't totally disgree with this, we don't know what kind of D Frazier would bring. The last three years have shown me that we are too small on D, small fast guys do not cut it when the weather gets bad. And you bring up a great point, the only personnel we have is for a small Tampa 2...Changing that will take at least 2 good off seasons without even touching the offense. When GW and MM were here, our offense sucked as well, but the D was much better than it is now...We cannot stop the run, we don't rush the passer really well, but we can pick off passess...The person who gets hired is going to need time to right this ship...I wouldn't expect too much the first couple seasons if they dump defensive players...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better how? Certainly not more qualified, and certainly not more experienced. Let's be honest, "better" means "pretending Ralph is making real changes", when, of course, he's not.

He's more experienced in terms of head coaching (college), working in a variety of systems, and working for more good teams. Plus he was a damn good player himself on one of the best teams of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before everyone panics... Gary Kubiak also turned down several HCing jobs, because later on he stated he just wasn't ready.

 

Jason Garrett has also turned down head coaching jobs, he wants the Dallas gig after Phillips leaves.

 

 

OTOH, wow... it looks to the world like this franchise is even worse then the Detroit Lions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said above and elsewhere, it's not apparent to me that Frazier is wedded to the Tampa 2. He walked into a situation in Minnesota with two dominating DTs and the best tackling corner in the league. Then they traded for the best pass rushing DE in the league. Seems to me that it makes sense to run the Tampa 2.

 

As for the Tampa 2, it's a perfectly good defense if it has the right people. The Bills don't have have the right people for it except for in the secondary, but that just begs the question of how the Bills' unit would look if it ran another system. The 46: with those crappy LBs? The 3-4: Exactly who would play nose? Given the Bills talent level, the Tampa 2 was most likely the best scheme for them the past couple of years. People get waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too hung up on scheme labels. Look at the players, folks. Give a good coach good players, and they'll be fine regardless of scheme.

 

Give some of us some credit, Dave. It's not the label, it's the softness of the scheme. I watched the Patriots carve up the Colts defense this year, just like they do most years, with their vaunted cover 2. I've watched this Bills "bend but don't break" defense which has led the bills to a, what, 1-19, record against the Patriots over the last ten years?

 

Look, there's no reason whatsoever to suggest he wouldn't run the Tampa 2 here. If you're a fan of that scheme, then be in favor of Frazier coming here. But if you're not then I don't think he's your guy.

 

For the record, I agree with you that we don't have the personnel to run a 3-4 or a 46, and so few people run a base 46 anyway that it's moot. I've been a fan of the 3-4 since I was a kid. I really like hybrid defenses and the "amoeba" look a lot of defenses give. The Tampa 2 doesn't confuse anybody, and more than anything else, that's why I don't like it. When Jim Johnson or Dick LeBeau or Buddy Ryan were calling defensive plays you never knew who was coming in. When Perry Fewell or Jerry Gray were, you did. That's an oversimplification, but it is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give some of us some credit, Dave. It's not the label, it's the softness of the scheme. I watched the Patriots carve up the Colts defense this year, just like they do most years, with their vaunted cover 2. I've watched this Bills "bend but don't break" defense which has led the bills to a, what, 1-19, record against the Patriots over the last ten years?

 

Look, there's no reason whatsoever to suggest he wouldn't run the Tampa 2 here. If you're a fan of that scheme, then be in favor of Frazier coming here. But if you're not then I don't think he's your guy.

 

For the record, I agree with you that we don't have the personnel to run a 3-4 or a 46, and so few people run a base 46 anyway that it's moot. I've been a fan of the 3-4 since I was a kid. I really like hybrid defenses and the "amoeba" look a lot of defenses give. The Tampa 2 doesn't confuse anybody, and more than anything else, that's why I don't like it. When Jim Johnson or Dick LeBeau or Buddy Ryan were calling defensive plays you never knew who was coming in. When Perry Fewell or Jerry Gray were, you did. That's an oversimplification, but it is what it is.

I can't give you credit here (no offense intended). The schem works great if the DTs are great. Indy doesn't have those guys. The Bucs did, and Minnesota does now. Monte Kiffin looks just as good as those guys you cite, but really, it's because all of them had good players. Buddy didn't look so great in the desert, and LeBeau didn't look so great in Cincy. It's not because they were bad coaches.

 

Jerry Gray never ran a Tampa 2 scheme, so I have no idea why he's being mentioned here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's more experienced in terms of head coaching (college), working in a variety of systems, and working for more good teams. Plus he was a damn good player himself on one of the best teams of all time.

 

A former small college coach who once played the game? Gotta say, that's not reaching very high. Perry Fewell has at least 7 games of NFL head coaching experience, and showed he could go 3-4 to finish the year for a terrible Buffalo football team. He would be able to put together a staff quickly, knows the area, wants the job, and showed that he would implement the hard-nosed style of football that Bills fans have been longing for seemingly forever.

 

I see Fewell as the better pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't give you credit here (no offense intended). The schem works great if the DTs are great. Indy doesn't have those guys. The Bucs did, and Minnesota does now. Monte Kiffin looks just as good as those guys you cite, but really, it's because all of them had good players. Buddy didn't look so great in the desert, and LeBeau didn't look so great in Cincy. It's not because they were bad coaches.

 

Jerry Gray never ran a Tampa 2 scheme, so I have no idea why he's being mentioned here.

 

I didn't mean that Gray ran the Tampa 2, just that he wasn't exactly the defensive "wizard" that LeBeau, Ryan, and Johnson are/were. And I agree on Monte Kiffin. But once Tampa's elite players got old/left (Sapp left, Ahanotu got older and wasn't elite to begin with, Spires got old and wasn't elite to begin with, Brooks got old, Rice got old) their defense declined precipitously. You can still run a 4-3 without running a Tampa 2. I'm not sure that the personnel isn't there for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leslie Frazier is a strong candidate. Not sure why everyone is down on him. He probably is the strongest candidate we will interview, unless Jason Garrett truly is a dark horse.

 

As has been the case in the past, and will continue to be the case going forward, until the following three things happen, it doesn't matter who is HC

 

1) The post-Ralph Wilson ownership situation is resolved

2) RW opens up his pocket books to show that he is committed to success

3) RW completely steps back from having influence on personnel decisions. This includes who to hire in the FO, who to draft, who to sign and who to re-sign.

 

 

It is no wonder that coaches are afraid to coach the Bills.

 

Though, as I've said, there are also plenty of reasons a HC should consider coming to Buffalo. I just think they are overshadowed by historical concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is so sad. RW has no respect by anyone in this league it seems. Time for Commish to step up and advise RW and his "advisors" on how to improve our state of affiars with this organization before we are a total 100% laughing stock.

Haven't you heard - we are a total 100% laughing stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leslie Frazier is a strong candidate. Not sure why everyone is down on him. He probably is the strongest candidate we will interview, unless Jason Garrett truly is a dark horse.

 

As has been the case in the past, and will continue to be the case going forward, until the following three things happen, it doesn't matter who is HC

 

1) The post-Ralph Wilson ownership situation is resolved

2) RW opens up his pocket books to show that he is committed to success

3) RW completely steps back from having influence on personnel decisions. This includes who to hire in the FO, who to draft, who to sign and who to re-sign.

 

 

It is no wonder that coaches are afraid to coach the Bills.

 

Though, as I've said, there are also plenty of reasons a HC should consider coming to Buffalo. I just think they are overshadowed by historical concerns.

 

 

I agree that Ralph needs to announce an exit plan as far as new ownership when he's gone or he needs to make an announcement that he will begin to sell off shares to the new ownership group, right away, securing the post ralph era. This will be the only thing that can possibly be enough for any of these "big time" coach's to feel good about coming to town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...