reddogblitz

I agree. It has totally ruined college fooltball because they review everything. NFL is almost as bad. And base ball? As if there's not enough standing around already. Instant Replay was originally to fix the blatant bad calls. Now they scrutinize and slice and dice it to death. If we were up to me, we'd dump it entirely.

Makes perfect sense. If it weren't for football, I'd hate the NFL. Unless they have a lot of "extra time" and then it goes to 30 minutes of overtime and then penalty kicks. But yeah it is pretty sweet that the whole game is about 2 hours. And no commercial time outs.

Because he can catch the football?

In the interest of player safety maybe they should make a rule for Thursday Night games that only scrubs can play.

I was hoping it was Michael Bennett.

Be careful what you ask for. Pence would be far worse if you are a Dem. Congress would actually work with him and pass a lot of scary conservative stuff.

I love this. Or if you beat Green Bay but Jordy Nelson drops a pass on the 3rd quarter. Then it doesn't count.

No, I'm not. I'm going from this Huffington Post article where they admit THEY did. Here's the link that evidently is no longer available. It was the cover story a few days ago. Maybe you can get to it. https://m.huffingtonpost.com/entry/facebook-regulation_us_59e5211ee4b0ca9f483a14bd?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009 Also a CNBC article about "legitimate" news sources using tweets as a source. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/11/03/the-washington-post-miami-herald-infowars-and-other-us-sites-spread-russian-propaganda-from-twitter.html

Really. This latest revelation that real news outlets like CNN, Huff Post, Washington Post, BuzzFeed, and the Miami Herald quoted "Russian bot" tweets reinforces my suspicion that most news reporters sit around and read Twitter and get thier stories from there. So much for the days of verifying sources.

A company has to be careful nowadays. You don't want the mob coming after you.

I think all but the truly uninitiated are painfully aware of this, thanks.

I think counting eggs is OK, but counting them as chickens is wrong. And definitely applies

And how many games would Tommy win if he played on a team that didn't cheat? It's called a Super Bowl Hangover.

It's never too early to talk wild card. His ain't baseball. They count as much in September as they do on December.

3 1/2. Then Nasty Nate and scrubs come in.

If a guy wins the Super Bowl, he is elite. That's my system which is obviously different than the OP's. But Eli should be in anyway by the way he won them. Massive 4th quarter comebacks against the eventual 18-1 cheaters. That's elite. And yes, Trent Dilfer counts too.

Not so good for me. I had Fournette starting on my team and I didn't hear about the suspension in time. We won anyway, in large part due to Hotrod getting 26.9.

Sign him.

Didn't trust the process, obviously.

Didn't Trust the Process evidently.

Yeah, and we can call him Space Cadet. Get him out in space.

I would say another positive was our kicking teams were able recover 2 onsides kicks in a row.

Maybe it was both?

1. Fumbles - on the upside, cost us 17 points. Should have got FG before 1/2. O'Leary fumble on Jets 30. Could have got points there. Hotrod's fumble gave Jets ball inside 10 where they got a TD. 2. Defense - sloppy arm taclking. Dropping a for sure pick on Jets 30. Can't stop the run. No pass rush. Guys forgetting the process and dogging it. 3. Offensive line stunk up the joint in run and pass blocking. 4. No viable backup for McCoy. How can you get a running team with only 1 good RB? 5. Shoulda played Kelvin.

Why do we have to pigeon hole players? Go watch a highlight film of Kelvin. You will see many catches where he is running across the field, not standing in a crowd waiting for a jump ball. And, yes, Hotrod does throw over the middle, to guys not standing still, and covered too. Oh, and Fitz could throw the ball past 5 yards. The truthisms around here are funny.