colin

puck the fats!!!

i like that lineup. if we get a decent LT (and the thing is it seems like there are 5 every year in the 1st round) at RT we also have meridith and bell who might improve and actually beat out butler (who i think is good, but the young guys have more raw talent). now if brohm snaps into being the guy he was in school, we got a winner!

anybody else liking nick harris?

put brohm in!!

fitz isn't a good qb.

if we land suh or the big kid from OU with our first, and sign wilfork or seymore in FA, then we'll have an insane front 7 for a 3-4 4-3 hybrid type d. of course we need 2 new tackles on O, but we could maybe sign one and draft one. there should be plenty of LBs we could get, dansby maybe? a front 7 of suh, wilfork stroud with maybin, schoble on the edge and poz and dansby in the middle would be pretty fuggin good. for depth we'd have johnson, and williams, we'd just need one more NT and 2 OLBs (we'd ditch a few guys of course). that would be radical, but maybe it's what we need.

we need 3 new linemen on our O line. true, i agree that perhaps just with a solid LT we'd have all the starters we need, but our depth is sht. imo we have about 15-25 good solid football players on our team, but the depth at LB, WR, OL, are all junk. it is worth noting that OL has more players than any other unit on the pitch at once, and LBs and WRs are the foot soldiers of the D and O respectively (with LBs making the majority of tackles and WRs getting the majority of yards and first downs) so the lack of depth there is just destroying us.

while we need OTs in a huge way, peters was a jerk off for us and it's good that he's gone. the thing the chubby chasers on this board, you know the ones who pleasure themselves to the giant fat bodies of linemen and look at their own girth and pretend they could play in the nfl and shower with their heroes, don't get is that you can have a great set of lines AND STILL SUCK. clevland has some high quality linemen on either side of the ball, including about the strongest guy in the nfl on D, and an LT who is better than peters. the thing is they still suck. it takes 53 players and plenty of coaches to make up a football team, and while we need OTs big time, we are actually better than cleveland (even tho we always lose to them!). imo you need a good d, best quarterback possible, and playmakers on O above all else. the lines have to be solid of course, but pittz and zona had sht lines but made it to the bowl last year.

i think we might go after wilfork. if we do we can go 3-4/4-3 hybrid, similar to what zona did in the play offs. with the crazy scheming fewell did against jax, assuming he can continue to have success with our rag tag D, he might be a great DC under a shanahan type who is 100% O. on a 3-4 down we could have maybin and schobel at OLB, williams stroud and wilfork in the middle. poz and mitchel could play the middle, or i think we will get a thumper in FA or the draft and have him in there. on 4-3 we have plenty of depth to mix and match guys, and if mccargo shows he is worth keeping he can be inside outside too. i think our D line is good and deep (if maybin hits in his 2nd year it could be very good) and with a couple new LBs (the team needs them for depth, we just don't have enough) our front 7 will be pretty exciting. our secondary is pretty sick and deep, so that won't change much. i really think of we switch up 34 and 43 opposing Os will have fits, and our nickle and dime packages would get a big boost. stroud williams kelsey schoble and maybin would be a good pass rushing front 5 with mclovin mcgee corner florence donte and byrd behind them. i think we are 2 or 3 guys on D (and not necessarily starters) from being sick.

i'd really be happy with that. imo marty is a great teacher of young players, he get's them going and playing with confidence in a hurry. i really think we can go out and sign/draft 2 tackles, 3 lbs, a wr, and have a squad that can play some solid ball. yes we need a qb, but i'll take good before great and we might get a qb in the draft

i didn't make anything up you whiny internet cop, look further back and you'll see it. you'll also see your posts are dull and joyless, not funny, and i blame you for the poor bills play.

whatever champ get over yourself.

lol, so gannon can tell the plays but our tard d and o can't predict anything.

i swear it's like we don't practice at all. our oline coaching should be shot in the face, firing them might not be enough

did you sit in some sand? you do post about it a lot and i know cuz i'm always posting about the same hold in the game threads.

lynch and jackson are just great tough players

ok, byrd is retarded sick.

simon btches about holding a lot, but he's dead on in this game. NICE TACKLE RIGHT THERE!

i stand corrected!!! evans has some SICK balance and body control. I ADMIT BEING TOO DOWN ON HIM!

since TO didn't go in i think we get 3 here. fcking sht O and horrible line and coaching :<.

we held the to a FG! we have had 4 BIG plays on the strong side edge against us. that's just horrible horrible line backer play/coaching. like i said, 3 new linebackers is what this team needs on D

we should have picked at least one of those ducks, but our run d is crap. on that TD everyone was bunched up in the middle, no one got wide so the entire strong side was clear. we need 3 new LBs. if poz can play outside i'll keep him there, but inside he hasn't got sideline to sideline range and he's not great in coverage or a thumper.

i like our backs but the blocking is horrible

your name is cow tipper?!!??! MONSTER!!! philster is going to have you banned!

harden up and stop being pussies, dogs aren't people. go watch a bull fight, eat a rare steak, and let your nuts drop.