Ed_Formerly_of_Roch

1.You're right, he's the best since Kelly, but that's not saying much. I like TE, think he'll get better, maybe if the line improves more so he has more time, he'll learn to throw down field. He is still young. 2. Agree, looked better than we expected. 3. This can't be everyone knows what a terrible GM RB is. It does show that all the experts around this site really know very little about what and who are good players. The Bill's made many moves that got them ripped. But in the end, none of them looked too bad. If they had made the moved a month ago, would they be better today, probalby, but who knows for certain. You don't want to rush int othings either. 4. Agree

"He's terrible at game day decisions and hasn't got better in years." I live in Carolina, and that's what they are saying down here about John Fox.

Yes it is her job, but if he wants to blow her off, that's fine too, he has that right. Considering the emotion of the moment, I don't have a problem with him and I also thought she came out of the situation looking dumber than he did.

Two seasons ago agreed completly, but now I think much of the lusture has worn off of Garrett. Alot of the blame for the Coyboys problems are on offense, which Garrett has been in charge of. So again I'm not so sure JJ is still in love with him

Or is it a case of RB and/or DJ wanted to get rid of Turk at the end of last season, but RW wouldn't eat the contract. Finally he had enough and said OK to dumping him. I agree with other poster, give RB a chance. In todays NFL being business smart is more important. You can get people with the football and scouting experience. These moves have little to do with football smarts anyway. Maybe RB is finally being allowed to make the changes he wants. Maybe DJ will be next followed by John Guy

But is it DJ or was it RW not wanting to fire these people and eat their contracts. Things then got worse so RW had no other choice. As far as LW, I have no problem with Bell at LT, just wish he had played all of training camp there instead of making the move now. LW wasn't a bad right tackle either so if you had left him on the right side and Butler at guard, the entire line I think would have been better. That I'll blaim on DJ, but not thr firings, that's on Ralph Havign said all that, I doubt things will be nearly as bad as everyone is thinking. The coahes obvioiusly saw LW ability at LT and felt going with someone brand new was the better option.

What is Brandon done that is so bad?? In todays NFL you need someone who is buisness smart, maybe even more than football smart as you can bring people in like Modrak etc, to make the player decisions for you. Yuo can debate whether Modrak is or isn't the right person, but you can still have football people under him making those types of decisions. Having someone else over them keeps them in check more. Personally I think Brandon has done a better job than John Butler as Bulter's problem was he was a scout foremost and loved every player he ever say, never had anything bad to say about anyone, AND way overpaid for talent. I recall Bruce Smiths last contract at the time was way overboard for someone his age.

It's kind of funny how everone is ripping Modrak yet two days ago I read posts stating how this is our best draft ever. So which is it?? Maybe the truth is this is a good draft as Modrak didn't have anyone else making the final decisions for him. Maybe he didn't want Whitner, but Marv did, so TM lost out on the final say. This time no one else but him making the picks, or at least at a minimum he had a much bigger say. On the other hand totally agree that John Guy has been terrible. Yes but you have many people here arguing how Kelly should be the QB coach, same thing a person with no experience in a job but was a hall of fame player. The one thing Kelly was often called was a "gunslinger" Why would you want a gunslinger as a coach?? Doesn't sound like a good approach to me!

I think it does matter. How many hall of fame players are successful coaches? Name me five! If you can't then background does appear to matter. The way most people become head coaches is they start out as a position coach, then become coordinator, then eventually a head coach. Often the person who was a good position or coordinator doesn't work out as a head coach, at least not the first time. Background completely matters, however it doesn't mean everyone who follows this path turns out to be a good coach. But all the coaches do follow this path. I don't recall any who came from Wall Street or was a former CEO. The head coach needs to be able to hire people who will be good assistants, which likely is a trait you develop in your years as an assistant, seeing what coaches work well and what type of things coaches do doesn't work. Just as the coach needs to motivate players, they also need to motivate other coaches. Lead by example.

Absolutely agree, he wants to be there on game day, but does he want to put in 10 to 15 hours a day Monday thru Saturday also? Plus many hours. weeks in offseason. Thats why he's interested in potentially owning the team as then he can high five the players on game day and relax the other six days. As I stated earlier, name me some hall of fame type players who have become successful coaches?? It doesn't happen. They don't want to make the committment for the low return financially, but they still enjoy the thrill of winning so do like being on the sideline and being part of the game.

Name me 5 superstar hall of fame type players who have taken jobs as coaches. Then name me two of them who have been highly sucessful as a coach. The one you could argue is Mike Singletary, though he certainly has not had any success to date as a coach unless you count making headlines for bizarre behaviour. I'd even go as far as to say the things he's done to date is typical of why highly successful players don't make good coaches. While he is a hall of famer, I don't think he was anywhere near the limelight that a guy like Kelly was at either. Successful players typcially make poor coaches because either things came too easy for them, and they can't relate to players who can't perfome at top levels, or they are the opposite type who worked extra hard for everything, then can't handle players who don't give 110% every minute of every game/practice/ meeting/ etc. On the other hand backups often saw the game through a coaches eyes on the sideline. Things didn't come easy for them and can relate better to others as they don't have an attitude that stars often have. Besides which people who are set for life with money aren't willing to put in the hours needed to coach.

But only IF he's willing to put in the same effort as every other coach on the staff is putting in. First off I doubt Kelly would want to do that. JK has been out of football for what close to ten years. If he hasn't got into coaching yet, why would he now?

If he were progressing, it's unlikely there would have been a need for a change. It likely would take more than four weeks, plus you typically sign players to play a certain offense, again something that's done in off season. At this point, AVP was the best option for them.

I'm thinking the Bills will bring a running back from some other team that was cut. Then when Lynch comes back that will be the person cut. So who is cut now to bring in the extra RB?? My guess would be Florence the DB. It likely would be much cheaper for them to sign some player that was just cut than it was to keep Rhodes as was mentioned in the one article,

So to all these people who think JK can be the QB coach and go home after 9 or 10 hours while the other coaches all stay for 14 hours or so. No one thinks that will be a problem. I assume he'll get away with it casue he's Jim Kelly. I don't think so! That will cause many problems. Can JK actually coach?? Yes agree, young players might enjoy hearing JK's war stories on the plane going to a road game or sitting around a table at the Big Tree Inn on a Tuesday at lunch. But that's as far as it goes. Star players made way too much money to ever get serious about coaching/ JK was never exactly known to be al lthat smart either which is needed to get int coaching. Motivation lasts about a month, then you need to show results

I have no idea how AVP will do as as coach, but the Bills are no different than many teams in the league in hiring ex-players who want to get into coaching. Thats the way things are in the NFL. Most ex-players either get their first job with the team they played for, or if one of their coaches when they played are now with another team, they may go there. As a few ex Bill's have got jobs with Indy, no doubt with some help from Bill Polian. Often these players were backups or low paid starters as anyone who made alot of money as a player likely doesn't want to get into the long hours of coaching. A 3rd sting QB also has a better idea how a game is called than a starter would, so again no problem threr with me. What starting QBs became good coaches? I can't recall any since Bart Starr, and he wasn't a very good coach anyway.

If I recall correctly RW got rid of him just prior to the last game of the seaosn and officially his contract expired Feb 1st, but for all practical purposes he was done in another wee kanyways as Jan not a whole lot is done other than review of players performance and start planning for next year.

I don't know. 9pm pacific or midnight on the east coast coincidently is just a little after the ending of the Sunday night game. It seems logical to me that the NFL wouldn't want anyone watching this package while live games are still being aired as the sponsors want everyone watching their games. So my guess is all the games regardless of whether they started at 1 or 4 will only be after midnight, or maybe after the Sunday night game ends. For $40 I'm still going to do it, but I'll be shocked if anything is available prior to midnight.

Typically 3rd string QBs are the coaches as the starters made too much money to now need go through the long hours needed for coaching. Also for many of these stars, things come too easy and can't relate well to players of less talent. The 3rd string QB also usually got a much better perspective of coaching as watched the game form the sideline. I'm not saying AVB is a good or bad coach, but him being a third stringer is typical of many coaches. What star players are now coaching in the league? Very few as most coaches are backups who lasted a few seasons in the league. Kelly was never exactly rumored to be a rocket scientist either. To coach you do need some smarts, can't do it on emotion. If you could Carl Mauck would stil lbe here.

So if you had this last year, how long did it take to watch the entire replay of the game without the commercials? Were they only available after midnight EST?

Not sure what you do for a living, but if you change jobs anytime in the future, you better hope your new boss doesn't read your posts or he may get the idea to fire you if you're not up to speed and doing as well if not better than everyone else within say maybe one month. You had better know everything there is to know if you hope to keep your job.

Yes it likely will effect his chances at starting this season. Likely the only way he starts this season is due to injuries of others. But if his missing three weeks of camp this year still has him behind the vets in three seasons, then he was and will always be a bust. The vets understand how the system works and will in no way hold things against him. The more rookies escalate salaries, the more down the road in will also increase the salaries for the vets when they renew their contracts, so in no way will they be upset. Likely they get more upset when players give "home town discounts" as that hurts others. I think your original comment is still correct. While it may be true that it would be really dumb for Mike to do, that is who he is, acting on emotions without really thinking things out, so wouldn't surprise me if he does react that way.

Was listing to John Clayton this evening on ESPN radio and according to him Maybin will be signing within the next 24 to 48 hours. According to Clayton all #1 picks are close to signing (even Crabtree) with the exception of Smith If true, Clayton is the man, the guy with the inside info. If wrong he always was and still is an idiot!! No other info on my part, just reporting what Clayton stated.

In the 2nd of the four SB years for the Bills, the year they played Washington in the SB. The year prior in their first SB loss, the last few games they used the no-huddle. The next season they started the year out using it and initially were unstopable, that was the year of the San Fran no punt game. About 10 weeks into the season John Davis blew out his knee, forget who filled in for him, but after that the no-huddle was never the same or as good. I always felt if Davis hadn't got hurt, they may have won that years SB. The next few years, they still ran the no-huddle, but never came close to those first ten weeks. Probably also helped that other teams figured it out too, but Davis made a big difference.

About five years ago I cancelled cable and RR and went with DTV and DSL phone for internet. I would have kept RR but once I canceled the cable, they were going to raise my RR price and they wouldn't budge on the cost. Went with DSL for about 2-3 months service was terrible. It was so bad finally the phone compnay gave up, couldn't figure out why or how to fix the problems, so they gave me all my money back, all the way back to day 1 of my service and told me sorry, sometimes they can't explain or correct why one person can have great service and the houce across the street can be terrible. So now had to go backto RR with basically my tail between my legs. What does RR do, they offer me a discount as a new subscriber which was lower even than I was paying to start with. If they had done that from the beginning, never would have left. so then when my intro price period ended, I called them up this time and told them I didn't want to go through what happened the last time, but if they didn't lower my bill, I'd go back to DSL (Even though no way I really would have based on past issues). So they gave me a price about the same as DSL.