Jump to content

Turbo44

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,717

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Turbo44

  1. Turbo44
    He vacationed with his ex in March, the cinci game was in January. Unrelated - move on
  2. Turbo44
    Fair enough
  3. Turbo44
    My bad - apologies. Hope Nate’s not fking with us. Not sure why he would?
  4. Turbo44
    Come on guys do some due diligence before posting this crap. That’s a fake Nate Geary account
  5. Turbo44
    Yes confused him with Murray, but Murray signed on 5/1 so maybe he was also the under $1.7m thing
  6. Turbo44
    Davis did have a high ankle sprain last year that hurt his year BUT, you are absolutely correct, DHOP is light ages better than any receiver on our roster not named Diggs. 3 drops in the last 300 passes thrown to him. Compare that to Davis’s, and for that matter, Knox’s.
  7. Turbo44
    Yep and also can extend Jones and push his money out. DHOPs contract can also be structured with “dead years” - like Vons - with a reasonable 2023 cap hit. We Can create plenty of space if Beane sees DHOP as a need. He may not.
  8. Turbo44
    Yep it’s why the Harris and Ford signing are so great
  9. Turbo44
    DHOP in a chiefs uniform makes them instantly better? Well yeah. Is there a team DHOP could sign with where he wouldn’t make the team better?
  10. Turbo44
    Neither should be on our roster tbh
  11. Turbo44
    How can KC/BUF not be a Primetime Game, and Denver and TB is? I know each team has to play in Prime Time, so that's maybe the reason??
  12. Turbo44
    Isn’t shavers 6’6”? Could be wrong but thought I read that somewhere
  13. Turbo44
    Our kicker was a 6th, Dane Jackson a 7th. Beane has arguably been better with his late picks than kid picks
  14. Turbo44
    137 (early 5th) for 150 (mid 5th) 215 (late 6th / prob a comp pick in 6th)
  15. Turbo44
    For - 150 and guessing prob a 7th??
  16. Turbo44
    BUF traded 137 to Washington - like it depending on return
  17. Turbo44
    No - ARI pick we got in a trade
  18. Turbo44
    I would trade down here if possible for a later 5th and a 7th - all lottery tickets to a certain extent at this point
  19. Turbo44
    Would he be a better replacement than Bates though? Can only keep so many interior olineman
  20. Turbo44
    Agree 100% - I wouldn’t have objected to him with our 3rd round pick
  21. Turbo44
    Tyler Scott wr is very interesting here
  22. Turbo44
    Yeah great analysis - you nailed it as we got the best receiver in the draft, wr or te. I wonder if they had him rated ahead of all the wr’s
  23. Turbo44
    Which could be the same wording for any of 31 other teams, though: "Bills trade for Hopkins may be close as terms, "figure out draft compensation and money"
  24. Turbo44
    Then you're competing with a handful of teams trying to sign him as an UFA and we'd never be able to compete money wise. Why not just swap 27 for 34 for a cash retained and restructured DHOP? Then take you MLB, DT or OL at 34. Makes a ton of sense - we get DHOP and the new ARI GM saves face
  25. Turbo44
    Would love it - 27 for 34 and DHOP. Like DW at 34 but might lean to LB due to bills non-use of TEs in their offense
×
×
  • Create New...