Jump to content

Turbo44

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,657
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Turbo44

  1. Yep it’s why the Harris and Ford signing are so great
  2. DHOP in a chiefs uniform makes them instantly better? Well yeah. Is there a team DHOP could sign with where he wouldn’t make the team better?
  3. Neither should be on our roster tbh
  4. How can KC/BUF not be a Primetime Game, and Denver and TB is? I know each team has to play in Prime Time, so that's maybe the reason??
  5. Isn’t shavers 6’6”? Could be wrong but thought I read that somewhere
  6. Our kicker was a 6th, Dane Jackson a 7th. Beane has arguably been better with his late picks than kid picks
  7. 137 (early 5th) for 150 (mid 5th) 215 (late 6th / prob a comp pick in 6th)
  8. For - 150 and guessing prob a 7th??
  9. BUF traded 137 to Washington - like it depending on return
  10. No - ARI pick we got in a trade
  11. I would trade down here if possible for a later 5th and a 7th - all lottery tickets to a certain extent at this point
  12. Would he be a better replacement than Bates though? Can only keep so many interior olineman
  13. Agree 100% - I wouldn’t have objected to him with our 3rd round pick
  14. Tyler Scott wr is very interesting here
  15. Yeah great analysis - you nailed it as we got the best receiver in the draft, wr or te. I wonder if they had him rated ahead of all the wr’s
  16. Which could be the same wording for any of 31 other teams, though: "Bills trade for Hopkins may be close as terms, "figure out draft compensation and money"
  17. Then you're competing with a handful of teams trying to sign him as an UFA and we'd never be able to compete money wise. Why not just swap 27 for 34 for a cash retained and restructured DHOP? Then take you MLB, DT or OL at 34. Makes a ton of sense - we get DHOP and the new ARI GM saves face
  18. Would love it - 27 for 34 and DHOP. Like DW at 34 but might lean to LB due to bills non-use of TEs in their offense
  19. As stated before, it's a no brainer: Trade 27 and a 5th for 34, a 7th and DHOP with ARI retaining $10m. DHOP restructures with Buffalo to even further reduce the cap hit. ARI's new GM can say he did well cuz he moved up for another 1st. We get DHOP, our choice of MLB at 34 and BPA at 59 (thinking OLINE, TE or DT), BPA at 91 (TE or DL or OL) and BPA at 130 (what's remaining between TE, OL and DL). Slam dunk, off-season won
  20. As is every team in the NFL who has an elite QB......
  21. Yep and if another DHOP thread damages a person’s life beyond repair, don’t read the fkng text. Why are people so fkng sensitive to one more thread on a message board? Grow up
  22. They can coexist - they’re close friends and want to win firsr
  23. Agreed - nobody is forcing you to read another DHOP thread. If you’re offended, don’t go on the thread Then don’t participate on this one
  24. I voted yes, because it's a given that DHOP's cap hit would be greatly reduced for Buffalo, otherwise the trade would be impossible anyway (couldn't fit him under the cap). 2 scenario's I could see: 1. Bills trade pick #59 for DHOP - ARI retains salary and DHOP restructures to make contract cap friendly. Bills then trades #27 for a low to mid 2nd rounder along with a 3rd or 4th. In the 2nd they draft their future starting MLB 2. Bills trade pick #27, and pick #130 (our 4th) for DHOP, #34 and pick #180 (6th). ARI retains salary and DHOP restructures to make contract cap friendly. Bills pick our future starting MLB at #34 or a stud TE (maybe even after another trade down into the middle 2nd) and the best available player at #59 (TE/MLB, DT or OL) Love this as that TE is ridiculous and should be available, but no MLB picked in the 1st 2 rounds keeps us pretty vulnerable there. Of course, with the offense you propose Defense wouldn't matter as much and we could always sign one post 6/1 cuts
  25. Cuz he doesn’t know anything
×
×
  • Create New...