Johnnycage46

Yeah and they should never have added the forward pass damn it! I say keep the integrity of the game and leave the plays in the game alone!! God you must be bored.

I have to 100% disagree with you on this. So, do you think if a woman is groped and prodded and touched against her will she would be ok with it if it was some handsome dude. That is total BS.

Actual experts. No quotations. Just, actual experts, with expert expertise in the field of infectious disease...expert.

Man these are shorter every year. Still fun content, but wish they could be a little longer/in-depth.

It's really funny how wanting jobs to be based on ability and NOT skin color is considered racist now. That seems to be the exact opposite of racism. I know full well racism is alive and well in this country and around the world. But it's not automatically racism if a minority doesn't get a job as a head coach or GM in the NFL. In this league where winning is everything, it seems absolutely absurd to think an owner or GM would not want to hire a coach that they felt gave them the best chance to win, simply based on the fact that that candidate is a minority. All while that example/fictional team is likely upwards of a 70% non-white roster. It just doesn't compute.

Is the lack of diversity at the player level an equal problem? I would agree that it is. And how do we KNOW that coaching choices aren't a meritocracy?

You don't drink it!!!!! You inject it.

Right but the discussion was not about his place among the greats. The original comment that I replied to was in regard to not counting the Pats out of the division race this year because Belichik is "all world". So nobody is saying he doesn't have a legacy. That was never mentioned by me. I was merely stating that without Brady it hasn't been all roses for Bill and the Pats. So without Brady this year, and with very weak QB play, I don't think the "all world" status of Belichik will matter.

Done! They're out of there! I get it. Belichik is great. My only point is that there are a lot of variables to consider during the Pats dynasty especially the continuity between HC and QB. I'll give you the Browns 11-5 team. But that was a single season. It just seems that there can't be a coincidence between Belichik's record once Brady arrived and before Brady arrived.

While I won't argue against Belichik being a great coach, his "all world" status has only ever been with Brady. In his head coaching career with the Browns and with the Pats without Brady playing (2000 and 2008), his winning percentage is 46.4%. Not exactly all world. The next couple of seasons without Brady will really tell a lot about who was responsible for their dynasty. Maybe they both needed each other.

My welcome?

Stop being mean and being a hater. Whelp gotta go drop ma kids at soccer practice. I would agree you are a consistent poster for sure.

Right? It's almost as if some people are angry we won games with an easy schedule...should we instead have lost them? Would love to hear the usual offenders' comments then. Damned if ya do, damned if ya dont!

Are you literally incapable of being optimistic? Constant negativity.

Did he? Or were you referring to the rumor of bills at vegas MNF? The post regarding bills at 49ers does not say rumor...

Not sure what this means at all in relation to what I said, in relation to what you said. Child molestation is not really a joke at all in any way. Not sure what you are saying.

Ah gotcha. I personally am not traumatized but I do feel very badly for those young kids that were sexually molested and had their lives ruined as part of the Penn State scandal.

I dont know why you would go there. You randomly asked me if I went there so I figured you went there. What was the point of bringing up Penn State then?

Nope. M.S. from RIT. Work for an engineering firm. Did you go to Penn State?

Amen. He is a contrarian by nature and quite negative. Hard-to-deal-with type. I guess the world takes all kinds.

This is one of those fake smarty pants sentences. All smoke screen. The fact that you wanted an RB in the 2nd round of the draft in the year 2020 shows that YOU lack intellectual sophistication with regard to the analysis of the criteria required for an astutely engineered draft (see how easy it is to sound wicked smaaht). And please don't ever say "inserted" in a reply to me again. It's quite upsetting.

You say a LOT of things repeatedly. And all negative, contrarian, and uninformed. But like I said, who should the Bills have drafted?

I think he definitely believes that. But maybe, just maybe, he didnt see value in going with a pick on Offense just for the sake of picking Offense with what was available against their draft board. In your opinion who should the Bills have picked at 54?

This fell on dead ears sadly. The point is....you know next to nothing about drafting NFL players. You question another poster as to why you should listen to them over Beane...and it begs the question why should we listen to YOU over Beane? The answer is we shouldn't.

With that in mind why would you question this pick? Boom, roasted?