cle23

Then prosecute her too. By all means they should if they can convince a jury to convict. ANYONE, regardless of party/position/whatever that breaks the law and abuses their position should be prosecuted.

What is false? Are you claiming that homosexuals abuse children more than heterosexual males? Because that is 100% not true. I mean, that's what I believe you were insinuating previously.

Yeah, these 2 are pieces of crap. They deserve the worst. Do you post every story like this, or only the "gay" ones? Because there is no larger group of pedophiles than straight white men. Also, tons of new stories leave out the faces of children for a variety of reasons, not solely because they were victims of a crime.

What's so wrong about this picture? Please elaborate.

Do you understand how our court system works? Only cases with evidence get to go forward to a jury. State and federal judges, some even appointed by Trump, dismissed over 50 cases of "fraud." So the evidence was so little that it didn't even make it past the stage of Trump and his allies trying to file the case.

I don't disagree. Both parties are hot garbage. They're essentially the same at this point. Even posters on here are so one sided its disgusting. I admit I tend to lean liberal, but it's only for certain things. Fiscally, I lean conservative, but "conservatives" today are anything but conservative. Socially I lean liberal, though I think certain parts of the liberal side are completely overboard at this point too. It's pure mayhem at this point, no matter who is in charge.

Cleveland doesn't have much cap space either, but Watson and Hopkins were amazing together for a few years. Not sure how he fits with Cleveland signing/drafting a lot of receivers this offseason. I think they've added 4 receivers this offseason.

This is an honest question. Why is debt repayment still paused? Is it still from COVID? If so, that's crazy. Take the loan out, then you repay the loan, while trying to force restructuring of student loans. But the loans shouldn't just be forgiven.

I have a question. What do you call people who keep claiming "rigged election" with no evidence, and who were denied in over 30+ court cases across the country? You call everyone else commies, but what do you call those people?

Yeah, I ran it twice with Cleveland. Once Chubb had 1500 yards. The next time he has 2200 yards rushing and 850 yards receiving. Lead the team in receptions too.

Reagan created far more problems than he helped solve, so that isn't exactly a ringing endorsement.

You're not sorry that you literally can't quote anything I've said that makes me a commie? Again, not agreeing with you isn't enough reason. Also, I don't think you fully grasp what it means to be a "commie." Most "commies" didn't have a choice, and were murdered or starved. Like I said, I fully agree that the "woke" portion of things has gone way too far. But people should be allowed to do or be as they please as long as they aren't hurting someone else. And there are consequences to that as well. It's just like the freedom of speech. You can generally say anything you want, but that doesn't mean that people can't treat you differently because of the things you say. You also accuse others of trolling, but tagging people and drawing attention to yourself is the biggest troll job on here right now.

Please, show me any of my "commie" posts. You just call anyone who disagrees with you at all a commie. For the record, I think the whole trans push is ridiculous. I feel people can do and be anyone they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. In saying that, I don't agree that everyone has to accept it. Not advocating violence or anything of that sort, but it also doesn't mean you have to be inclusionary just because people say you do. But again, please quote any of my "commie" posts, or admit that you just call everyone who disagrees with you a commie.

Purdy wasn't elite by any means, but he was extremely good, especially for a rookie late rounder. There is no guarantee he improves, but there is also no reason to think he wouldn't. They are pretty much elite everywhere else.

The 49ers have a top tier roster, with the only question mark really being QB, and they had a great rookie QB, so I get where they are coming from. I agree with Baltimore being high. They have names are WR, but no one that has produced in 2-3 years +. Their defense is good, but their secondary is aging.

No, the change would be to register at the border, that isn't how it is currently. Right now they can go in however and then apply once in the US. The new rule Biden proposed would be to have them register at the border crossings for at least the next 2 years. Like I said, it appears to have at least gone into a trial effect, but I couldn't find that out for sure. Which would make Biden's proposal more stringent than the previous rules.

As of May 2023: Under U.S. immigration law, migrants fleeing persecution can request asylum regardless of how they arrive on U.S. soil. President Joe Biden’s rule, which could become active in May and expire after two years, would presume asylum ineligibility for those who enter illegally. The penalty would make it easier for the government to deport border-crossers who express a fear of harm, potentially reducing the number who are allowed into the United States pending a hearing in swamped U.S. immigration courts. The trial had until May 11th to go into a 30-day effect, and I couldn't see if it did or not. So I am not sure if this is in order now, or just in the works. It's kind of amazing because Biden has essentially just kept all of Trump's policies on the border in tact, and even added tougher laws in some spots like this, and is still accused of "open borders." Not saying they are doing a great job or anything, but most of the outrage is made up.

And you're ignoring that a majority of that debt is mortgage debt fueled by low interest rates. Rates are up now, but this lists from the lockdowns. It was more affordable at that point to buy homes than rent, or plenty of people upgraded homes due to the rates.

You're a broken record at this point. Calling people commies is like 90% if your posts.

Well, if everyone just walks away as suggested and gives away Crimea and such, Putin would just focus on his next target. He's not going to just say thanks and sit down. He's proven that already. The point being that they can't fight the current war forever as suggested. But if everyone just gives in, there's nothing to suggest it would stop there. And I do believe that Putin is going to try to solve this with more and more bodies. That doesn't mean it's going to work.

You do understand that if Putin is just given Crimea and the Donbas, that he will just move on to his next target? He thinks all the old USSR territories are rightly his/Russia's. Russia cannot just keep throwing bodies at the issue like they used to. Their equipment is junk. They're using WW2 guns in a lot of places. They are running out of planes to deliver the bombs.

Invasion absolutely can make people the "bad guys," the US included. Russia is the bad guy here. The US is the bad guy in Iraq for example. The invader in the situation isn't ALWAYS the bad guy, but they usually are.

Probably not, but I didn't during Trump's time either. That's my point. You post here nonstop about all the problems caused during one administration, yet ignored the previous administration doing the exact same thing. Trump had 24 reported deaths of immigrants in custody and he was lauded for his policies. Now the chance to jump on Biden (though I do think there have been other deaths) and you're all over it. Making everything partisan then makes everything you say seemed biased, even when I am sure there are times you aren't. Partisan politics have got us to where we are today. Point the finger at the "bad" guy in office, all while doing the same things. Both parties do it too. Also, in case my other post wasn't clear, I mean the death was unacceptable. I reread it and thought it may have been unclear.

' Yes, both sides of the media portray it how they want. One side says they are all asylum seekers, which isn't true. The other side says they are all coming in as an invasion and just illegally crossing. While technically right about it being illegally, they leave out that 99.9% of asylum seekers have to cross illegally because they can't apply for asylum otherwise.

This is unacceptable. No one should disagree with that. Did you post this response for the 24 deaths in custody for Trump? Be outraged, that's fine, but be equally outraged.