PrimeTime101

Same. I think Cook going to shock people..

dont try... he SEE'S different....

I loved Joe Montana because of the pride he showed in himself and his team the deep ball accuracy I loved Vic due to what he brought to the game. I Hated Bradey (best to ever play the position) so far... but he arrogant sob cheater. Josh Allen brings Big legs and Big arm to a game that is rare... I would love Josh Anywhere. But OP? He is a Buffalo Bill so who cares right? moving on

AH LOVE clarification. thanks ha ha sorry your clueless have you watched any of his film? or full games? I have.

Lack of vision? what are you talking about man? maybe you should go back and look who and what i was quoting in the first place

are you saying I would of rather of gotten Hall? I am happy who we got...

I just want to say... people talk about speed.. Combine speeds mean nothing.. You want to see someone run fast? Attack a steak to a guys ankles and let the Deverman pinchers chase ya... then you see speed Point being.... you run even faster with people chasing you... Just thought I would throw that out there....

tell me then What is the difference between Breece Hall 4:39 and James Cook 4:42 You actually think .03 is the difference between Elite speed and not Elite speed? That what you're saying? Or should we of gotten Tariq Woolen ran a 4:26 .16 faster then Cook? Should we of gotten Tariq Woolen in round 5?

I dont want more.. I want better.. IF they better then great...

I think this topic needs to be locked bigtime..... WE DID NOT GET BREECE HALL! Lets move on.....

This thing of Cook being just a 3rd down RB is not really that real in the mid term like after a few games. The dude can go slot... go wide.. runs great wheel and in/out routs and a any RB that can do that with this good of a base can learn even more from a guy like Diggs. Not saying Cook will be thrown out at WR often but the point is running or receiving the ball.. Cook will be a threat to take it every down. We run a ton of first down quick outs to WR's and TE's. I mean hell you can run a 11 personal package with McKenzie and cook out there and either someone is going to get burned deep or someone is going to get burned off the screen. Options... Endless Just a 3rd down back? sorry I don't see it.

I covered this earlier in this topic.... there are tons of scouting reports that go around. When a weakness hits a scouting report it kind of sticks with you... so much copy paste by armatures... and it sticks... I watched 2 of his games and all of his highlights... NOTHING soft about this dude....

Speed not only kills... it allows you to do a great many things. Because he is also good at man... You can do the typical man lock on one side and give tre help with some of the best WR's in the game with Safety help... OR you can put tre on the #2 WR and lock him down.. and lock the #1 WR using speed and a Safety.... OPTIONS. And I remind you what Seatle did when they had 2 really strong Corners on that SB team... You play against a team that does not have real #1 WR's ... and there are many teams like that... you can man up tre and Elam with 2 deep a deep safety and a guy in the middle that you blitz... or keep in the middle for extra help.. or blitz.. OPTIONS

so im trying to watch some of his games... i have watched 2 games so far... not one time did I see him try a lame tackle or not react well to a tackle... Sometimes scout reports are duplicated so many times, that unless you watch the dudes games... you would believe them. I think he is a fine open field tackler and I think by the time the dusk has settled at the end of the year... they either let him man the #2 wr and play mixed man/zone (many teams do this) or they play zone on his side and let trey man up... bottom line if he turns out to be a really strong #2... you can do so much more on defense. When Tre went down... we were stuck in zone hell

Some points of interest I got out of this highlight reel. #1. He had a couple PI that would of been called in the NFL #2. People have knocked this dude for not being physical enough at point of contact? not sure if I agree with that assessment #3. This guy played some great Man and Zone. #4. This dude not only had some INT's in his college career but they were AMAZING int's and this highlight reel does not cover all of them. #5. He needs to watch his hand checking. #6. We needed speed in our backfield and we got it. Against a pro like Hill? I would use his speed double covering Hill and Tre on the other side. #7. He does not fall for the fakes to often... rare as a CB. thoughts?

This is what we needed.. Speed/Quickness/Solid decision making out of our backfield.

Im going to shed some light on this whole thing. His father died less then 2 years ago. He was his personal trainer.. his life... they had a very close relationship. At the presser he wore a picture of his father. This is a dude that does not like to show true emotions. I am sure his father had his favorite teams and he had his favorite teams. Also at the presser he talked about "it not hitting him yet" The dude is going through a wide range of emotions. Jim Kelly did not want to play for the Bills at all... Maybe this kid wanted to play/live where its warmer? who knowns. 1 week in buffalo with teamates will be all it takes..

im not one to beat my chest and say I told yas so.. but seeing you replied... i will do one victory lap

thanks to all your spam bumps...

I would agree but this didnt need its own thread

you know we could not resist at least 1 double dip lol..

We going to break a record for 100 pages the fastest ever in these forums? On a Punter? Get er done!

Superbowl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

BAM!

Right but i am not using a crystal ball infront of me and saying a 4th or 5th grade player(I trust experts more then you) is going to be better then what we have... That is serious crystal ball work