1ManRaid

For a closer, it's a save only if the lead is 3 runs or less. It's not just "if had lead until end". I know what baseball terminology is, I played baseball. Technically there's also saves for entering the game with the tying run at the plate or on-deck or pitching the last 3+ innings, but either way it's not just simply the last guy to pitch. Typically the most common save for a short appearance is one inning with a lead of not more than 3. Also a "closer" is not simply the last guy to pitch, it's just a term for the relief pitcher on a team most trusted to close out close games, typically in a SAVE situation.

And then win the first Chiefs game to really stir crap up.

Not a save, we were leading by more than 3 touchdowns.

I doubt it was malicious, the game was already long over at that point and they were potentially saving him from himself as the rule is meant to do.

Lol you honestly think everyone would have just been happy with the performance if they somehow pulled out the win? You really have that little of an opinion of, well basically everyone, in the entire organization? Not a single person would have recognized that maybe a couple of those INTs shouldn't have happened, that maybe Josh should have just taken the easy run for a first down despite wanting to run less overall, that maybe a draw up the middle on 2nd and 15 in OT is stupid, etc?

I'm tired of this by definition pathetic loser mentality. You overcome and win. Do we hand back wins where we didn't play our best? Are we owed a win if we play well but fall short? We were denied even a chance to overcome the situation we were in. Were you upset when Josh persevered and got us to overtime, or were you rooting for Bass to miss the FG because we "didn't deserve it"?

First and 10 on the 42. Foul at the 27, 15 yard penalty to the 42, plus 18 yards for end zone and snap = 60 yard FG. Odds are the Jets run 3x up the middle for no yards. I'll take those odds any day over literally just handing the Jets the win with a TD on a blown call. That's the difference it would make, you sad quitter. How are you getting the 20? Foul was at the 27, plus 15 yard penalty to the 42. That's a 60 yard FG hardly a chip shot. 42 yard line, foul at the 27.

For the record, the RT for the Jags was the same one who is now in the news about cheating for the Chiefs. And yes, he was doing it just as bad back then. Gotta learn from the way Tua and the Fish took what the Chargers were giving them. They were for some reason happy to give Tua his strength of throwing over the middle, until they panicked and started crashing the middle only to leave Hill open down the sidelines for easy TDs. But as for our receivers being little mites who can't make contested catches? Huh? Diggs is no giant but he makes contested catches all the time. Davis is a big boy who also makes them. Then there's our tight ends, plenty of guys you must be confusing with our slot receivers.

I'm willing to bet cash money that was a "Gardner Special" that caused the receiver to not get far enough for the ball. I bet the "Josh needs to stop running" were screaming at their TVs for him to leg out thr first down.

He said the toilet wasn't flushing when they were done with the installation and he couldn't get them to stay and fix it lol. The lads (me) can't be there because the place is a disaster until they finish the work tomorrow.

I can't believe you slackers haven't gotten around to making this thread yet. My friend's place suddenly needed emergency plumbing done for burst sewage pipes, so I'm having bar food at the Canadian base for the Bills Backers (Manhattans in St Catharines, Ontario). Starting with the good ole burger and fries and seeing from there.

ANY offense would look legit when the opposing defense (like today's Chargers) go "Oh, you're good at literally one single thing, throwing over the middle to YAC merchant receivers? Well then we're going to leave the middle of the field uncovered and DARE you to try to beat us that way!" I have no idea what they were trying to accomplish.

It helps that the Chargers apparently didn't read the scouting report on Tua living on throws over the middle. It's ridiculous how they're just letting guys run free down the middle and making Tua look good tossing to YAC merchants.

Sure. Your place, or mine? It's a very thorough and hands on demonstration.

I have an amazing tip on how to smuggle one in that is guaranteed to get through a pat down.

Pro tip, check the time stamps on thr "breaking news" you're trying to drop. If it's more than an hour old, 99% chance we already know and have multiple threads about. Maybe use the search feature.

That rocking back and forth like a drug addict was a bigger tell than Lamar's habit of tucking his chin on handoffs and keeping his head up if he was going to keep it and run.

It's literally a carbon copy of what happened to us against the Jags a couple years ago, and cost us the game. Sure we played like crap, but it was a close game and all the non calls for their RT being a full 2 yards off the ball when snapped on every play helped the Jags. *edit* Tackles lining up so far back and never being called for it is one of my biggest pet peeves about officiating.

"Knock it off with that 'public pressure' crap, or we'll call your bluff and you won't get a dime." But on the note of Hines being partially responsible, I kind of see where the unpopular opinion is coming from. Of course he is right to sue and should get every dime he legally can, but it's still stupid for a professional athlete to be engaging in such an inherently dangerous activity. It's akin to buying a lottery ticket with the prize of pain and suffering, and losing a livelihood worth literally millions of dollars. No reason to become a recluse in bubble wrap, but maybe stay off the jet skis, motorcycles, etc. There's a reason these activities are often banned in contracts.

I had a free bet so I put it on the Lions winning, but Goff makes betting on them shaky. Last year he was historically good at home/terrible on the road.

Whenever a Bills player demonstrates a hint of swagger, everyone blows up about them being classless distraction to the team and a diva who wants to leave the team for reasons.

From what I could tell, the 3.3 beers is mostly about when watching the team on TV. Pre-gaming in the parking lot at the game itself is often about not having to pay ridiculous beer prices during the game. I know it is for me.

Yes. We know. It's been known for decades.

It's not the fines she'd have to worry about, it's the slam dunk lawsuit and criminal charges.

I gotta be the guy to point out that this tattoo is not new.