oldmanfan

Beane acknowledged after the season they messed up on that. They now have Allen as starter and Barkeley as backup. Mistakes get made, the key thing now is to correct them and learn from it. What else should be done now - should we take them out back and shoot them?

Let's see if Joseph makes the team first

Well said. When folks tell you that you should put them on ignore, it basically means they don't have a leg to stand on with their thought process.

Parse words all you want but you think McD's pride affected his decisions, and now you want to play word games instead of standing by your opinion. Did you not look at the above post. I own my opinions and when I am in error I say so. You don't do either.

The graph is a classic example of the risks of misusing stats. There are a whole host of variables that can affect this graph that are not detailed.

I have acknowledged where Allen needs to improve. You have confirmation bias and it is shown by how you pooh pooh the majority of moves made by the organization. I have taken grad level statistics classes and have asked you on several occasions questions about the data sets you look at for your pronouncements. Things like observer variance among others. You refuse to answer , much like you have here with confirmation bias. I think that's because you really don't understand stats, and cherry pick things and use your own observational bias to get the negative result you seek.

Are you familiar with the concept of confirmation bias?

Yep. And Beane admitted that.

I brought it up and so I looked back. I don't find the one I recalled from memory; I recall something from Kyle about it. McD stood up and said he did not regret the decision but did regret the result. And put Taylor back in as starter. So I can't say for sure he apologized. I can say if he was being driven by pride he would not have stood up and admitted he didn't like the result, and that starting Taylor the next week is likewise evidence of pride not driving decisions.

You may have used a different word than consumed but you said pride affected his decisions. It's one thing to have different opinions; we can debate those honestly. But when you refuse to own your own words as you do that's another matter entirely. And Shaw already explained snap count differences between offense and defense but you just ignore things that show the error of your thoughts.

He didn't struggle. He ate up blocks. That's what McD said. And if McD was consumed with pride he would not have stood in front of the team, told them he made a mistake starting Peterman, and reinstalled Taylor as starter. You can keep claiming the sky is green all year long if you want, but your ranting about it won't make you right. Sigh. Maybe half the total snaps because when starting he played all downs then sat when they pulled him for Teller. Shaw has already explained that. I could be wrong. Go ahead and pull his snaps per individual game and check.

Yep. When they spend then it's immediately the wrong guy to bring in.

I will put money down right now that Dareus does not sniff All Pro status again. Do you recall the incident with him missing the bus? McD was quoted afterward about how they had talked it out and Dareus understood things. There were pictures of the two of them talking things over on the practice field. Dareus simply did not want to step up. And thus got traded. in your company or whomever you work for, is it your policy to have your highest paid employee be the one that flaunts the rules and becomes a problem, or do you expect your highest paid employee to be one of your leaders? And Lynch and his agent told Buddy he would not resign after they drafted Spiller. That is reality. As I have said before a opinions are fine but should have some basis in fact and logic.

So when a guy can't show up to a bus on time, that's everyone else's fault. When they got back there were pictures of Dareus on the practice field with McD talking to him, trying to reach him. It is crap about folks not trying to help Dareus when he was a Bill. Different coaching staffs tried to help him out , tried to motivate him after the big contract. They couldn't get through to him, or he wouldn't allow people to get through to him. Marrone and Coughlin are trying and from my recollection there were off the field incidents with the Jags as well (I'll research that). I felt for Dareus when his brother died. That's a tough one, and if Brown used it the way you say that's flat out wrong. But there is simply no denying that, after he signed his big contract, Dareus was not and has not been the same player. And you just can't have your highest paid guy not putting out effort. You look at the true stars, guys like a Bird or Jordan or Gretzky or whomever, they practiced harder than anyone, worked harder than anyone, held their teammates accountable to that level of commitment. McD wants guys like that. What coach wouldn't.

So McD came into the job thinking his own background wasn't impressive. You have got to be either joking or high on something.

After trading Dareus and Watkins and after Gilmore leaving the Bills made the playoffs. And by the way when a guy signs with another team in free agency you are not letting them go. Hockey I hope Krueger brings the same kind of approach as McD. Set clear expectations, be willing to communicate expectations, and so on.

You don't know what might have been going on in the locker room. None of us do.

The stuff about Dareus, Watkins, etc. kind of comes down to whether you are more on the side of the player or the coach in terms of how you see a team should be run. To some here (who should be obvious) the players should be coddled, the coach should acquiesce to whatever the player wants. It's on the coach to deal with recalcitrant guys and not the other way around. Count me firmly on the coach side of this equation. McD tried to get guys like Dareus especially to buy in, and when he didn't he let him go. Sammy himself has been quoted about how bad his attitude was while here. Beane and McD have a specific idea about how successful teams are constructed, and they are going to follow that plan. I don't know if they will ultimately be successful, but I am glad they are holding players accountable. What is it that Belichick preaches, his one thing he tells his players constantly? Do your job. Essentially that is what McD is doing.

We'll see. I love having Gore around; I can't imagine how useful he'll be imparting wisdom to Allen, and the other young guys. I wonder if they'd keep all 4 RBs and cut DiMarco?

Someone might throw out a lower round pick. It will depend on injuries, etc. that always happen in the pre-season.

If you look at the contracts for a lot of the FAs they signed this offseason they are short term deals, if I recall correctly. Makes a lot of sense; see which guys perform and then extend them, let the other guys go. I hope they are thinking about extending Poyer and Hyde.

It really comes down to Buster Ramsay. The last 58 years are his fault.

What does the current regime have to do with the previous 17 years?

What is it about being in the playoffs in their first season that is so difficult for you to grasp?

Given the fall off seen in Dareus' play, why do you think it was a bad decision? Got rid of a guy with issues, cleared cap space. Also, what do you see as good decisions made by the current regime?