Really would hate to see him wear any other team's uniform.
I would understand in that he might want to put himself in the best place to make a run at a championship now that the Buffalo playoff monkey is off the back, but it would still sting.
Fair point, but (1) going for it on 4th down and WR types are two different choices, and (2) an effective analytics department should be continually re-working their numbers to combat the NFL defenses' adjustments.
I fall in the crowd who wants us to package #21 and #22 to move up, BUT I really really hope a couple nice front 7 prospects are there at #53 and #56.
Green the DT/DE from USC and Nnadi the DT from Florida State come to mind.
I think the following would be accurate:
inconsistent,
opportunistic, and
back-heavy (secondary way better than front 7)
(given the poor state of our offense, "tired" might be applicable, too)
Agree with the notion that DBs will just take down WRs who have a step.
If this rule is implemented, then I cannot wait to see the reaction of the first fanbase that is the victim of their WR about to haul in an 80 yard TD only to get 1st and 10 on their own 35 yard line.
That's generous of you. I do not trust they have a full human brain between them all.
Totally on board for bringing in Ivory, retaining Cadet (injury-permitting), and drafting a guy in rounds 4 or 5, like J. Adams (ND) or I. Smith (Miss St).
If the price is right, why not?
Would surely be kicking ourselves for not at least seeing what he's asking for if Poyer or Hyde go down next season for any significant amount of time.
I would not be upset if they left it as a spot foul at all.
But if they want to change it, then I don't think subtraction is unnecessarily complicated.