Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,193

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. 34-78-83
    The tackle play was at least above adequate with Bell and/or Hairston in there. Agreed on the Wr's though. And a very large need for better Lb's
  2. 34-78-83
    One of my favs to listen to, even more fun to play ! Wish you and Bill lived closer , you could come see us play it.
  3. 34-78-83
    He may make some plays this week but it likely won't be from the backfield... he is (at least temporarily) a slot WR, and like someone already said, is doing pretty good with RAC.
  4. 34-78-83
    Jauron sure would have run the ball there ... Just sayin...
  5. 34-78-83
    This.... The alignment called for single coverage on the outside on Stevie. This team and regime is gonna throw that 100 times out of 100. If it's not underthrown it's a TD or incomplete. Fitz just needed to make a better throw. I hear the frustration from folks though. That call approach can also win you some games.
  6. 34-78-83
    Nope
  7. 34-78-83
    RIP Mr. Davis
  8. 34-78-83
    Could not have said it better myself. Thanks!
  9. 34-78-83
    I've been waiting for one of you to notice and point this out. You are exactly correct. Good eyes!
  10. 34-78-83
    Haven't read all the replies but no I disagree about what beats the Pats. What is needed is a strong middle rush. Brady Laughs at the edge rush. Push up the middle is the only thing that consistently gives him fits.
  11. 34-78-83
    Na , I was worried about Leotis based on the words of the TV and radio announcers, but when I actually watched the whole game, after I got done coaching my son's game, i noticed he played a lot better than they made it sound. The one long pass was a perfect throw to a speedster and other than that he missed 2 tackles on guys that weren't his initial responsibility and got sucked inside (along with Merriman) on one outside running play. Not great, but certainly not what it was being made out to be.
  12. 34-78-83
    David Nelson is arguably our 2nd best WR... If not he's 3rd. He keeps the sticks moving and has good hands and plays well in traffic. There is ZERO chance the Bills will even be considering cutting David Nelson.
  13. 34-78-83
    Or maybe the TE position isn't too integral to the planned scheme. Much like last year, guys like David Nelson ( quite a promising possession guy) and Brad Smith for that matter, can fill that role in the spread offense Chan likes to have Fitz run. If they get a guy like that that's great too, but it's just what it appears like when looking at their offense.
  14. 34-78-83
    Condolences to you Scott.
  15. 34-78-83
    No Rudolph on the board either?
  16. 34-78-83
    Yes!!!! Love the pick!
  17. 34-78-83
    There hasn't been a D-Lineman any where near the capabilities of Bruce Smith since he retired. Not even close. Not Peppers, Not Mario, Nobody. I'd be happy with Fairley but I like Dareus better as a player , not just as a safer pick.
  18. 34-78-83
    I haven't seen a ton on either guy but from what I HAVE seen, Dareus is just as good as Fairley.
  19. 34-78-83
  20. 34-78-83
  21. 34-78-83
    One thing is clear.. Brohm doesn't have the clock in his head that Fitz does. Fitz made this group look better than they should have at times. Actually more than that... often.
  22. 34-78-83
    Where were all these posters with foresight last week on TBD?
  23. 34-78-83
    And neither would Chris Johnson for that matter
  24. 34-78-83
    He's a shoe in Pro bowler if this team has a better record. That's really all there is to it. All the not big enough or strong enough or fast enough has been debunked 10 times over by Kyle on the field all year long, and he's got very little help.
  25. 34-78-83
    Yawn
×
×
  • Create New...