Jump to content

NoSaint

Community Member
  • Posts

    42,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NoSaint

  1. Imagine asking for so little and the team struggling to agree to bend even that far
  2. ultimately he could be listed at WR and play a FB role. This designation doesn’t change much. And we can keep 12 tight ends and no full backs if we wanted. I think we all pictured him in the kind of H back, versatile around the line of scrimmage role, and not a big threat split out wide consistently. Even as a “FB” officially I think we all expect him to be an in line blocker like a TE on snaps and more of a passing threat than a traditional FB too. it’s a pretty minor procedural update in the grand scheme.
  3. meh. For roster designation it doesn’t matter much. Eligible for a few new jersey numbers but everything else is exactly the same.
  4. I will say that waiting til camp is silly, albeit better than never.
  5. I think prevents is a tricky word. it substantially reduces risk, even if not eliminating. Clearly the Nfl wants to encourage that reduced risk. the NFLs issue in this is going to be figuring the tipping point on vaccinated vs unvaccinated to make that serious call on forfeiting a game. If it’s blended and no known source, how do you call it?
  6. it may even continue relatively uninterrupted. We will see. if he could land in a place that’s a bit of a media black hole, that may help. But winning cures a lot and he’s a very good qb. I would not be shocked to see a big package with playing time qualifiers on the first rounders.
  7. yea but to be fair he has like 2 catches
  8. Im not saying this trade makes sense but a consideration on any round two pick for a rental is we would be ideally trading 60-something and if not signed would got 90-something as a comp. so trading back a year and a round, not just giving up a 2
  9. if he voluntarily isn’t showing up already the league office may be a bit slower to take a stance that they would have to legally defend. showing up forces their hands to say whether or not he’s allowed in the building.
  10. I think the point being made is “I am here and they have not done it yet - for a reason” as opposed to staying away and the reason potentially being that he made it easy to side step the formal designation being placed
  11. you should fight him about it
  12. he gets older and they stay 18
  13. Unless he faces punishment
  14. the proverbial pile being more often a running back or lineman for instance, in discussing the rule on a wider level. and I suspect there’s a bit more ability to think about it than you are giving credit for. I don’t think every hit is measured and thought out but I do think plenty would know “diggs has broken ribs- im going to take a shot at them.” No doubt in my mind that every safety and corner would have that memo
  15. though if you know he has either broken ribs or a bum knee do you think that linebacker may go a little higher or lower? Or that DT getting up off the pile may shift his weight differently?
  16. and the team will get fined because that’s the rule. again, this is going 59 in a 55. It’s boring. It’s low impact. Everybody does it. He’s not getting jail time. He wasn’t even the guy driving the car in your analogy as it’s a rule for the team to report it, not the player.
  17. hyperbolic to the point of being Counterproductive. I can’t speak to what base you think you are standing on but I don’t recall bases being way out in left field. It’s going to be difficult to score from way out there.
  18. comparing a rule at detriment to player safety but helping fans bet to drunk driving is a bit much
  19. that’s pretty much 100% the reason. It’s not like he was trying to get defenses to respect his threat to scramble. He didn’t want dudes hitting low or giving it extra attention in piles.
×
×
  • Create New...