CSBill

We’ll, some special teams good news: Haack has not muffed a punt today.

Herman!

There’s a strong correlation to the fix of the online.

“Get the jet warmed up, we’re out of here as quickly as we can be. Do we have to come out for the 2nd half?”

TD here, nothing less!

BATES has made all the difference to this oline.

Great effort Addison!

DAWSON KNOX ….He’ll never wear sleeves again

Too late

Okay, Pats inactives?

Officiating is at its worse in this game. Such an embarrassment.

if this happened to the Bills, this board would blow up.

We’re not giving away any secrets.

To the post heading (question): No. I, like many if you, can get frustrated with him at times, but (1) don't under estimate the value to Josh Allen, and all the offense, of the consistency of having the same OC and system for four years running now. I cannot blame him, or Frazier, for pursuing the opportunties, but if I had any choice, I would do all we could do to keep them. Another consideration, (2) the entire coaching staff seems to be on the same page and works well together, again, the power of a common vision, goals, and shared values in how to get there, is not to be taken for granted. And, (3) It appears there is great trust in these goys by the players. Again, something that takes time to build and has a big influence on their performance as a unit.

Do we have a direct link? I want to see this.

Well, we've owned Flores, and he has owned the Patriots .... so I'm not so convinved this was a good thing for us??? .... But if it means the fish are committed to Tua (and no Watson), okay, I'll take that. Also something else to consider, the Texans' new GM is a former Patriot front office guy: If the M Jones stinks again this evening, I have no doubt BB will be on the phone as soon as he can trying to swing a deal for Watson to come to NE. ... Twice a year Bill has seen how great athleticism in a QB can be so hard to defend, Watson is one of the few available (if he is) QB's who can match Allen in this way. ... Yeah, I can see this scenario happing. Just some things to throw into the "be careful what you wish for" conundrum of life.

Happy Play-offs Game Day, TBD! We got a lot of time to get all kinds of work done today. So focus, be productive, get your chores done, and then settle in for a glorious winter evening in Orchard Park as our Bills put a beatdown the Pats. It's going to be a great day, and even better evening all over Bills Mafia Nation. GO BILLS!

Wow, 20 points per game (their offense) over the past five years. That is incredible.

That was funny.

Bill is always playing mind games. Long ago he made the Injurt Report a meaningless thing for NE.

Agree

Maybe this is why McDermott doesn't practice outdoors?

I agree, as long as there is no wind. He seems to have trouble tracking in bad conditons. Stevenson is just not savy enough at this point--my only memories of him is running straight into his own teammates. If the conditions are favorable, I go with McKenzie, he is a threat to break one every time--but how are his hands in cold weather? If not, it is Hyde.

-5

Question: How bad would it have to be for local public health and government leaders to step in and say, “No game” in these conditions, because of the threat to peoples' health and welfare? Has that ever happened? I know the NFL rules the world, but at some point a greater concern would have to supersede them. A few years ago I was at a major college XC meet with several races. It was unseasonably warm. In the early races several athletes were having issues with the heat. Athletes were passing out all over the place. There were so many ambulances called in, it looked like a parade. About half way through, the meet was shut down because the local hospitals and emergency system was overwhelmed. In this case, if holding this event potentially puts too many people in danger, and potentially over-taxes the emergency care system, would or could they, say “no” and force the NFL to reschedule it?