Mr. WEO

Not 80% no. Most past plays are to a receiver not within grasping distance of a DB

Because he kept turning the ball over. I thought you watched the game. Manning won a SB with Broncos with 13 passes completed

Burning bridges with who? Nate Hackett? He's a bum. At least Payton has the nuts to say what really was going on there. It's what most football fans could plainly see.

Manning completed 69% of 43 passes. The problem was he turned the ball over 3 times leading to 3 scores.

grabbing a jersey should be a called hold 10/10 times.

Getting signed and cut over and over again isn't a strong argument. The only team that played hardly ever did and now they have cut him a second time. The film and analytics--at least of the Bills organization, who know him better than anyone---led them to conclude he's not worthy of even a camp spot. They cut him again. My conclusion is easy to arrive at. Yours is simply a feeling you have. Why make this something it's not? Good for this kid, he keeps getting a few checks.

Might as well hand him the one year contract as soon as he gets out of his Uber to camp

it's the vicodin taking.. he's gonna run out of shoeboxes for all those receipts

Diggs is done sharing received footballs.....

how are they even practicing in Miami?? How many players dead so far? I know a potential cramp or sprain is bad but...are they piling up the fallen??

No he didn't. Vick was a journeyman. Reid won 20 and lost 20 with Vick. Maybe you if want to call Alex Smith a journeyman (he really wasn't). He was 38-36 in SF, 11-5 in Washington. Reid and McNabb went to the NFCC championship 5 times and lost 4 times--including 3 in a row. Belichick brought a 3-13 Browns team a few years later to 11-5 and the playoffs and beat NE....with Vinny Testeverde as QB.

Culpepper's best year by far was 2004 when he rushed for his fewest yards as a full season starter (just over 400). If a Qb is only a "huge running threat", he stinks. This is what we saw in RG3. Once healed, it wasn't lingering injury that slowed him down. Defenses wouldn't let him run. Once the league saw his game isn his rookie season, they easily defended him vs the run. Disrespecting him as a passer, they shut down his run game.

name 5 better

it’s indicative of what his coaching staff thought of his play. That and getting serially cut with little or no play from 4 teams. what contradictory stats do you have?

it has nothing to do with being part of that coaching tree. Rivera gets canned during or after this season

RG recovered from his injury. Turns out he was a flash in the pan.

This is more likely. Anyway, Diggs said all the platitudes expected of him today, all cliches were mentioned. Issue is put to rest with this (non revelatory) performance.

He should be peeved he didn't take their previous offer. These guys are dumb. What's the point of paying an agent?

Too many bums on that list. Allen has a few more years before he's "done at 33". Let the guy play his game.

So….paper tigers?

It means 4 teams didn't want him on their roster. His stats explain why. Those aren't my "presented stats"---they are this guys career stats. Even the Bills--the only team to give a real spot, couldn't find hardly any situations where he was needed. In the end, they concluded he wasn't worth keeping. They saw more of him than any poster here who claims he was a promising playmaker. Go tell your stories to McD and Beane. Tell them why they are wrong.

Rivera is on the coaching tree SB list for a win as a player (not coached by Reid)?

not me bro! I mean they had to pay this guy whatever. But not exactly eye of the tiger right there... 1 playoff game where he and his team choked away a 20 point halftime lead....to Trevor Lawrence (despite his 4 ints)!! After going up 27-0, here are all of the Chargers subsequent possessions: punt, FG, punt, end of half, punt, FG, missed FG, punt. Tons of yards and TDs (regular season) though...

As for causation, t's not what I think, it is what medicine knows. I am simply telling you want the current medical thinking is. Why do you keep attributing this to me? Is there a correlation between type 2 DM and sugary drinks, etc? Yes, I have already stated this. It's not causation. The mechanism of insulin secretion and function is well understood. It is not deranged by eating a lot of candy.--it's exacerbated by eating a lot of candy. Your doctor telling you not to have sugar laden food is giving you good advice. If he's telling you that your past eating habits made you a diabetic, he's wrong. Tell him to contact the ADA for some educational material he can review. A lot of doctors want to blame their patients and their behaviors for their problems. Metcalf isn't in the group most at risk---overweight sedentary individuals. He limits his risk of developing DM by staying fit and of appropriate weight, not by limiting his sweet tooth. I don't know how else to tell you this. Anyway, anyone looking at Metcalf can tell you that that bit about his diet is something he made up on a jock podcast.

injury settlement/cut