Mr. WEO

Hire whoever you want. Players will eat whatever they want.

Dr. Jimmy the Greek has entered the chat...

So hen do they dump Ron Rivera? Who will be the new GM? Those are the only meaningful changes for your team, not who the owner is.

That "new regime's" success was basically Josh Allen. Josh Allen isn't walking through that Giants locker room door. The Giants were in a free all the second half of the season. They were awful. They did beat the worst defense in the NFL in the playoffs, KI'll give them that. But I don't see a low power guy like Jones putting that team on his back and, with his under 25 total TDs, repeating that feat. Giants D gives up too many points for that. Rodgers is obviously a better QB and the Jets have a better roster--their Defense is top 5. They won only 2 fewer games than the Giants last year, despite having the worst QB room in the NFL.

Aaron Rodgers has a higher risk of totally bombing than Jones? Anyway, his "system" relies heavily on Barkley. The Giants totally backed into the playoffs--starting 7-2 and then winning only 2 more games in the second half of the season. "Good situation"? They had 4 wins in the NFC. They won a single game in their division. They were not a good team.

Difference is, when the Knicks stink, the Garden still sells out. Fans don't stay away--prices on secondary market were still crazy. The change in ownership high will fade quickly. I guess so. But why would it make fans more likely to see the team that will be fielded--because when they look toward the owner's box, someone else will be there? This team has many actual problems. Bad man as owner wasn't really one as far as performance is concerned.

No they aren't---there are far too few of them for that to be true. Far more of the economy is funded/grown by institutional investing and tax revenue. Billionaires buying toys aren't a significant stimulus. They've always had that option. It's how the league works.

I don't recognize him in that photo

I really don't know how this changes anything for the fans..

the claim that was made was the he is a good ball tracker, so his catch % shouldn't be a career 53%. In 2019, he caught 3 passes over 40 yards, only 20 total over 20 yards. the guy has had seasons with receptions in the 30's and 40's. That's a guy struggling to get to the ball.

Washington fans cheering wildly, yet when they woke up this AM their team still stinks. No franchise WB and “Riverboat” as HC and Andy Reid’s menu laminator as OC

missing the playoffs altogether?? come on with this...

Interior O-lineman under contract looking to make a power move against Jerry in his 10th season. good luck bro!

It's really not a practical difference. The reaction time is the same and the breaking distance required makes either impossible at those speeds. The 140 is what is tugging at the pearl strings here...

That's my point. Perceptions are driving this mock outrage, not facts.

people on this thread losing their minds over the mph. rest assured had he "only" been doing 100 mph on that highway, the potential damage to life and property would be exactly the same.....but this thread of pure outrage would never have existed.

12 years to get to 2 games over .500

wait...what??

Was he an usually talented blocker?

Hey, maybe the Vikings will be able to pick up a WR1 in next year's draft, right? Anyway, what's wrong with real speed at WR? Bills could use more...

Seriously. Brown's career shows a guy with often mediocre, sometimes below that catch %. That doesn't speak to great ball tracking.

more like 85%…

Holmes was known for his cylinder, not his rectangular prisms

wut

That's a hair I would need an electron microscope to split..