pimp on da' net

(My Wish)- The Bills start out in spread formation and show some creativity...go uptempo and attack the Jets secondary. Pound the seam with passes to Chandler early if they play cover 2, this will open up the WR's later in the game. Also I'd like to see some double moves in some of the early routes to put the Jet's on their heels... (The reality) - I'm gonna play the percentages with this OC and call out the first series. Two runs up the A/B gaps, for minimal gain and then a 3rd & long pass for a first down.

The Bills are in good shape salary cap wise, plus some others can re-structure their contracts as well...It's a new sheriff in town and he wants to win. Not saying go spend like a drunken sailor but you have to keep your playmakers (even though our OC is glueless ,as to how to use CJ) but let see how the rest of the season shakes out.

I agree with most of this especially learning how to identify & expose the mismatches. How the hell he keeps trying to pound Spiller up the middle is ridiculous...yesterday's gameplan should have featured more Jax & Dixon, IMO. Spiller should have been used on misdirections and as a decoy, if not used on wheel routes against the linebackers.

CJ is akin to a wideout and a terrible QB. He needs a coordinator that has some freaking ingenuity & competence !!!! How can an OC not design his offense to the strength of your game breakers? If he wants 3 yds & a cloud of dust, that's idiotic to even design that for CJ. We've seen what he can do with someone who knows how to design an approach. Case in point, Andy Reid goes to KC and continued to design his running attack around the strength of J. Charles. Hackett needs to go, IMO. His approach and playcalling is so pop warner-ish it's ridiculous. He doesn't have a clue how to setup or attack a defense at all. CJ needs to be in a multi- WR set or used as Sproles, Charles or even Forte mold... On that pick 6, the OC never set up the deep pass to even try that curl by Watkins. Hackett has a birds eye's view from the booth but still didn't recognize or understand how to setup the DB to make that play work. He's in way over his head, IMO.

Thank you

I agree! Good job Lonnie Johnson.

The beauty of hindsight but you still have time to change the title of this thread, LOL. Sometimes you just have to let things play out sometimes before rushing to judge!

This is funny !!! I literally laughed out loud!

I totally agree with you. Everytime he gets on this rant I change the station...it's an obvious attempt at shock jocking to spur discussion (which isn't that bad of an attempt but get over it!). But he's just SO smug that he really believes his own hyperbole... Analytics are numbers and stats that don't account for realistic situations ie., weather, opponents strength & weakness or the strategy within the game. It's like the fantasy nerds way of affecting the reality of the game. It should be put into perspective. I can see that in specific cases where it may apply ie. red zone & goal line situations and the opponents trends in certain situations, that's about it!!! How about having a good game plan & finding the right match ups for your team to be successful & leave the virtual game for fantasy football leagues?

My point exactly...I don't think the GM has to be replaced unless he fails see the need to replace this coaching staff. Let hope he has an awakening

Ahhh haaa. Good point! More evidence that RW is incapacitated but we as fan are stuck between a rock & a hard place. We need new blood (no pun intended) at the helm. I agree My point exactly! Not sure if Buddy will do it but he has to see this as well.

It is hard to come to grips that this experiment with Chan Gailey is flawed after 3 long & tiring years. Here are my exhibits: 1. He's won just two games against divisional opponents under his command. Seems to be il-prepared strategically against the top two head coaches in our division. 2. He continues to snatch defeat from the grasp of victory...with his play calling at crucial moments in the game. The games won this year besides KC have been nail biters because of his decision during the game... 3. He hasn't realize that the opponents defensive strategy is to make Fitz the focal point of the offense but he continues to be blind to the fact. And he continues to not understand why the defensive fronts, shows heavy run patterns to make fitz audible to the pass or worst empty the backfield (think in basketball leaving the self-check guy always being left open on the court) making the QB the play-maker instead of the RB's. 4. He's now something like 10 games worst than D. Juaron at this time in his coaching tenure with the Bills. And I don't see any improvement in any shape & fashion with any phase of the team...there should be some progression after 3 years & I don't see it. What do you guys think?

I am not sold at all !!! Count me out of the sweepstakes!

^^^^^^^^^ Now that there is funny...

Jones was in the game at that time if you review the video. Btw he's open as well & a better option (then CJ) because he could get out of bounds if not score IMO.

Well said. I subscribed also just because when I travel it's easier to follow what's going on back home.

So sick of this argument...We're our own worse enemy with that. Can we please drop the whoa it's me attitude.

I agreed TJ in that situation is running either the seem or post but with the safety 3-4 yds in the end zone. The receiver gives the QB a better window to throw if he cut across the face of the safety ( btw,chance are he's gonna take a big hit). The option to go behind the safety shrinks the window because the end zone & out of bounds.

Maybe Potter's released...no need to carry him if he's not going to be used.

^^^^^^^^^that was good, LOL. Put me down for 212 yds against and what he said ^^^^ for the post game comments.

8- that was tough but if Reed is right for #15 then my score = 9

It's part of the job of being the coach...not saying he has to know all but you'd think he'd know a little more about core players on his roster. How would you think Bellicheat or Rex would handle one of their core guys? It's been said that the Patriots Organization is very astute with each players on & off field dealing. Ex- Bills (S. Morris & S. Aiken) players have commented on how the Patriots is about running a first rate organization. There is an article where C. Wire said the same...

I heard the post game comments from him. Sounds like typical frustration after a bad game to me...he basically said he didn't care what expectation others had of him because he has expectations of his own. Shouldn't read too much into post game frustration, especially when the expectations may have been inflated because of the off-season pick ups. Which begs to question, how does a perennial pro-bowler and up & coming passer rush (Anderson) suddenly become ineffective? Does Scheme, coaching & timing of defensive play calls have any effect upon performance? Fans are quick to point out the big payday these guys receive but forget the drive and recognition these guys crave from their peers. Coaching, strategy and timing of the calls has much to do with a player's success.Do you think the Saints would have struggled out of the gate with Peyton at the helm? How bout Wade in Houston, Harbaugh...these guys have basically the same players the previous coach had they just made better use of the talent. Flame away boys...

What he said ^^^^^

I totally agree with the OP. In the preseason the excuse was that the defense was not game planning but they have looked il-prepared so far. Chan & Wanny have NO idea how to adjust or strategize the opponent during the game, IMO. There is no other way to explain how we make every mediocre QB we play look like a superstar. Chan, IMO doesn't call games that great either, he's at a crossroads with how to play Jackson & Spiller...I'd like to add my 2 cents. 1- create 2 offensive packages one with spiller using run & pass plays which he excels with. Do the same with jackson. The position on the field is important because it will dictate which player would start that series. These plays for each player would only add up to a handful but they would come from multiple variations just to keep the defence off balanced. 2- In red-zone & goal line situation I'd actually would line up both players. I'd line up Spiller off-set with jackson in-line where he's good with finding the hole between tackles. This would put spiller in position to threaten the edge and hold the DE/OLB to contain. This set helps open up the entire offense because it 1) slows the pursuit from the edge. 2) take a defended out of the hole between the tackles 3) playaction for quick slant to Stevie or Jones 4) seem pass to Chandler or swing pass to CJ. Now this all depends upon how the defense begins to over play each set but that's film study and coaching but I'd rather attack a teams weakness to our alignment. IMO, this is not a practice by our coaching staff at this time.