All Activity

Suppose you were to make a list of the successful draft picks they had prior to 2015. Then ask yourself, are there any guys on that list, who would have been unsuccessful in a post-2015 NFL? Off the top of my head, I can't think of anyone who'd fit that description. But, your suggestion about the league changing could be correct in other, perhaps more subtle ways. Perhaps there was something they were looking for in players which became less common. Or maybe there was something they should have been looking for in players but weren't, which became more common. If I had to guess, I would guess that there may have been at least some changes in their front office, which may have influenced the quality of their results on draft day.

I guess it would depend on whether or not I made a claim, as you did, that is refuted by a spectrum of accomplished individuals. You did a lot of typing today to end up at “maybe they didn’t read, maybe they are wish-casting”. One of us is most certainly a hack.

Thanks—we owe those clowns nothing but continued domination of the East to match the precise # of our drought years imho. Sorry Drake, not sorry—you’re about to get Mac Jonesed by the best QB in the NFL.

I have it on good authority around here that Shakir is primed for a breakout year so here’s hoping!!

Exactly. If he had all three abilities, chances are we wouldn't have just signed him for a modest contract with a bunch of incentives

Taller/better version of Shakir, kinda.

Let me ask you something, and I encourage you to answer honestly. If I posted a long list of legal experts who agreed with me or were even more convinced of Trump’s guilt, would you provide evidence as to why they were wrong? Would you spend time explaining why they are all wrong? Or are you just a hack?

Being reminded of Andre makes me jump down the rabbit hole of his YouTube highlights…<sigh> that speedy YAC stuff never gets old!! https://youtu.be/VNrl-WgnbRM?feature=shared https://youtu.be/GsNCMiRxyP4?feature=shared

Definitely interesting, lots of space for discussion there. The point however was in relation to Davis implicitly being responsible for those when he wasn't for the most part, rather they were either bad throws and/or poor choices for throws. Allen liked Davis which is why his TD% was so high. It's also interesting that most were on the deep offensive side of the field.

This is hilarious. And desperate. Nice work counselor. Good lord.

You can buy my club seats. $2k for the pair. After all, it’s important to you to watch your team clinch the playoff birth right? Heck, I’ll cut you a deal since you’re such a swell guy. $1700 and the tickets are all yours. No taxes. No fees. I’m doing you a solid and saving you some money from Ticketmaster. It’s a good deal for both of us.

Peterson's comments on this game and this play definitely didn't reflect well on OC Dorsey's passing concepts and personnel usage and the ease in identifying and preparing for those tendencies. Davis' usage in particular in both the run and pass games had become insanely telling pre- and post-snap. Earlier in the game, Minn d-linemen were able to time the Bills negative goal-line sneak in part because of Davis' predictable motion. So obvious, so often. Are you suggesting Davis should have sped-up/shortened his route to protect inside leverage? I see it more as Davis didn't convincingly sell/threaten to the outside, especially in light of Peterson's expectation for Davis to break inside. Was Davis supposed to read Peterson's cheating inside and underneath and then break outside instead? Or did Dorsey simply telegraph the concept with his tendencies and personnel alignments and Peterson slow-played it just enough to bait Allen? Also some room to criticize the throw, given the DB's leverage. Mirror of the same basic throw he fired into Davis for their 4th TD in the 13 seconds game (just breaking right-to-left instead), late, low trajectory missile that's underthrown if the CB is trailing/anticipating.

Maybe they haven’t read them. Maybe they are relying on how things work in jurisdictions other than NY. Maybe they know it’ll get them more attention. Maybe they are wishcasting. Why don’t you call them up and ask if the prosecution’s allegations qualify for violation of federal election crimes or tax crimes? The documents clearly identify the charges and also provide the elements for several other crimes. You don’t have to believe that the prosecution is correct to acknowledge that they have documented their case. There are also plenty of legal experts who don’t fall into the bucket that seems so convenient for you.

Thanks for posting the video. I did a basic audit and found this: Josh's Interceptions Vs Yards beyond LOS Intended Receiver NYJ 60 Harty NYJ 41 Diggs NYJ 15 Davis WAS 40 Davis JAX 50 Diggs NYG 11 Sherfield NE 18 Kincaid TB -2 Kincaid CIN 19 Davis DEN 22 Davis DEN 16 Harty NYJ 48 Kincaid PHI 3 Diggs KC 14 Sherfield LAC 43 Diggs NE 40 Kincaid MIA 8 Davis MIA 40 Davis Ave 28.67 yards INTs per intended receiver Player INTs % Target % reg season Davis 6 33% 14% Diggs 4 22% 27% Kincaid 3 17% 16% Sherfield 2 11% 4% Harty 2 11% 4% Knox 1 6% 6% Shakir 0 0% 8% I think it's really interesting that Josh's average depth of interception is almost 29 yards. On many of those plays it seems he was just chucking the ball downfield and not showing much discipline. Also interesting how incommensurately high the INT% to target % is for Davis, Sherfield, and Harty. Note also that Shakir was not the intended receiver for any of Josh's INTs.

Maybe we can try one more time and you can attempt to answer succinctly: why are there so many accomplished legal people declaring that no “other crime” has been specified in the charging documents? There’s no need to discuss the actual trial as you have done ad nauseam or pretend you have a higher knowledge of NYS law than any of these people 🙄. Let’s just stay with the charging documents you started with.

Kiyan has been forthcoming that he’s not committing anywhere until Oct/Nov, but he’s gotten some recent reliable “crystal ball” predictions to Cuse in 247.

Like I said, get out before he's allowed to sell. MAGA will hold his bags forever once he dumps. Peak grifting.

Since “jaded” has no relevant meaning in this context, I assume he got his “j” words mixed up and meant to say “jilted”. Typical Pats moron

Will that be any stronger than the Reich the Dems have already built?

It's more deflection because the Dems are now the party of anti-Semites. It's similar to how they're trying to claim Trump is anywhere as senile as Biden.

No. Tons of people didn't vote and the ones who died later died from dehydration...

Nope. Not at all. The crimes are all there in the charging documents. Whether or not the prosecution has proved them is a matter of opinion.

pipe down or you'll ruin it for everyone