All Activity

"Guys, GUYS, listen..." 😅

I think he throws a couple picks and we win. This is Mike Tomlin and the Steelers. They like to win 20-17 games. They have been doing it for years. I think 24 points wins it

Pay no mind to them discussing a troll account seriously.

By Rachel E. VanLandingham, Lt Col, USAF (ret.) Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth should be impeached for his abusive threats to court-martial Navy combat veteran Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., in retaliation for the senator’s participation in a videoreminding service members of their extant legal duty to disobey unlawful orders. His behavior is unconscionable and unbecoming for the leader of the U.S. military, and Congress shouldn’t tolerate such an unwarranted attack not only on a decorated combat veteran, but also an attack on the legislative branch itself. Secretary Hegseth’s dangerous blustering ignores the Speech and Debate Clause and attempts to exploit Sen. Kelly’s status as a military retiree who is still subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Relevant to this discussion, the UCMJ contains military-unique crimes and fewer First Amendment protections than civilian law does. But Sen. Kelly’s video is nowhere near criminal — even under the more expansive military code of crimes. Hegseth claims the video Kelly contributed to undermines good order and discipline, and is service-discrediting, conduct criminalized under the UCMJ’s “catch all” crime. Yet the exhortation to follow the law by disobeying unlawful orders isn’t prejudicial to good order and discipline. Nor does reminding service members of their legal duty cast discredit upon the military. However, following illegal orders would surely bring discredit. The video does not encourage military members to disobey lawful orders, nor otherwise suborn mutiny, which is the collective disobedience of lawful orders. It speaks to the exact opposite: the duty to disobey unlawful orders. https://www.ms.now/opinion/pete-hegseth-mark-kelly-pentagon-military-orders

We should have used him as a WR nobody is ever around him. SUPER BOWL

The building frustration was aptly summed up in an extended quote Punchbowl News publishedMonday from who they referred to as a “particularly exercised senior House Republican”: This entire White House team has treated ALL members like garbage. ALL. And Mike Johnson has let it happen because he wanted it to happen. That is the sentiment of nearly all — appropriators, authorizers, hawks, doves, rank and file. The arrogance of this White House team is off putting to members who are run roughshod and threatened. They don’t even allow little wins like announcing small grants or even responding from agencies. Not even the high profile, the regular rank and file random members are more upset than ever. Members know they are going into the minority after the midterms. “More explosive early resignations are coming. It’s a tinder box. Morale has never been lower. Mike Johnson will be stripped of his gavel and they will lose the majority before this term is out.”

the joy of ranking two dozen common head coach mentioned names alphabetically perhaps, and call me crazy, your perception of how he’s currently viewed is slightly out of touch

@SoCal Deek is a architect I believe and has been there He probably has a solid objective opinion

I think you’re largely right. My view is pretty simple, who would I in the playoffs? The underperforming Bills, Chiefs, or Ravens or the over performing Broncos, Colts, Jaguars, or Patriots? It’s really not close from my view. The historical cream of the crop is still the cream of the crop in a single game elimination.

Brady is out next season

No, because when he was here, the team put talent around Josh

Did he request the playbook yet?!

Odd conclusive question. If a coach says, "we need to play complimentary football," it means, "we need to play complimentary football." It's not an admission of guilt or a statement of frustration with execution. It's just an observation. The perceived solution is whatever it is in that situation.

Oh Definitley, I’m aware he’s forking out some cash. Was a bit in jest in terms of the peanuts comment. I did however watch a guy on YT who’s an expert on pro sports stadium builds and highlighted Highmark 2 is the worst he’s ever seen. Take that for what it’s worth.

Was impartial to the guy before I watched that Joe Rogan podcast episode he appeared on. He’s not as bad as is made out.

except when it comes to the Bills

Poor guy.

thats the bind you put yourself in when you hire some one with no actual experience...should have learned that lesson with Dorsey. i could see brady filling in the rest of the year but then do your due dilligence.

Well tbf they are probably paying 1.6 billion + for the stadium .. 245 million of psls They still are paying well over 1.3 billion with the overrun costs that are happening The Ralph was also Built by tax payers

Was recently back for a reunion weekend including the Bills opener. Hit up Lucia's right next door now and Johnson's Landing, among others. Good times. Glad to see they're doing so well, all around not just in going to state. Go Red Raiders!

Should've signed with Carolina if he wanted a chance to get back to the Bills.

Curious if you’d have to fabricate some sort of base? Folks will find a way to make them display nicely.

When McD says we are not playing complementary football, that's trying to cover the fact that we are not a deep, balanced, or consistently good team. It suggests that it's possible to be consistently great; we just need to play "complementary football." That's the only problem! Fix that and we're a great team. Much easier than saying "this is an aging, inconsistent team that doesn't have enough elite players and doesn't have elite coaching." My $0.02.

"As god as my witness I thought turkeys could fly."