All Activity

I've got to think Sedrick Van Pran-Granger will replace one of them.

I’m totally taking a few of the condiment dispensers.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46883076/mark-sanchez-fox-sports-analyst-following-oct-arrest After the alleged attack last month, Fox has let go of Mark Sanchez. We all pretty much knew Fox would make that move. It was more a question of when. "We can confirm that Mark Sanchez is no longer with the network. There will be no further comment at this time," a Fox Sports spokesperson said Friday. But Drew Brees has been hired to be his replacement alongside Adam Amin and Kristina Pink. "I appreciate the opportunity FOX has given me in the booth and with their team," Brees said in a statement. "I hope my passion for this game is reflected in the knowledge and insights I provide to the fans each Sunday." His first appearance will be Week 11 with the assignment unknown at this time. "Prosecutors have charged Sanchez with a felony count of battery involving serious bodily injury, along with three misdemeanor charges, including public intoxication."

Yeah, like I said, scared - thats the literal definition of scared. Well too bad for you then given that there is almost no way that happens to where neither Chiefs and Ravens make playoffs. The entire premise of this thread is based on something almost certainly not going to happen. And here is the kicker - There is no reason the Bills cant be the 1 seed even if Ravens and Chiefs by some weird circumstance both missed the playoffs. I get it is a "what would you prefer" thread, but I prefer we trade for Justin Jefferson too, still not likely to happen. Still, the statistically correct answer is always take the 1 seed, even if the alternative is not having both Chiefs and Ravens in playoffs. Neither team is what they were last year.

Why won’t Trump negotiate? The Dems named their price. He can end the thing now. (They both can.). But he won’t give an inch. And the “ask” for Dems is on health care. Totally reasonable, from my point of view. So they’re both at fault to an extent, but objectively I see Trump as the one being more unreasonable.

Division round exit

Now, if 6 turned up to be 9, I don't mind, I don't mind.

Yes, Schumer is winning. Also, sign the clean CR. He won’t, because hes winning, but that doesn’t absolve the left of suffering. Both sides are perfectly fine with people struggling as they fight for power. If you can’t acknowledge that, then you’re purely partisan and there’s nothing further to discuss.

I'm legitimately shocked at the vote. People would prefer us almost certainly having to face the Chiefs and/or Ravens in the playoffs (even if it's at home) over us playing any other combination of AFC team anywhere on the road 3 times? I get that it's one more game that you'll be playing and it will be on the road, but do you guys really think they'd be more likely to lose any of those games on the road than they would be to lose against the Chiefs and Ravens? Is this a "to be the best you've got to beat the best!!!" argument???? %^$ that!!! Gimme Ws please and the easiest path to a Lombardi!

Thank god

I believe it's the worst November in the market in 17 years.

Meanwhile, Trump is fighting to not provide SNAP benefits. He had an easy out and could have just blamed the courts. Nobody's hands are clean here. But, objectively speaking, Schumer is cleaning Trump's clock from a political perspective this week.

It’s not being “driven into the ground” The stock market being up shows confidence in next year. That said, it’s not great .. people are still struggling .. and Trump needs to stop his world’s president shtick and focus on the economy.

I mean I am equally excited to watch this team move the ball with ruthless efficiency and just pile up points. I don't care how they do it, just do it. I mean, Allen seems to be at his best now when we can comfortably sit back and watch him pick apart defenses and have almost zero concern about a turnover happening. And score more points than any of those teams ever did.

Well it didnt work the last 2 playoff games against KC. May be they will play better this year.

So aside from that (the economy, being driven into the ground, and inflation running rampant), Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?

Fins chase empty waves, Tua's passes fade to dust, Dolphins sink again.

I was tempted to vote for Option 1 just because I dont want any "yeaa... buts" that would come from a Superbowl win with scenario 2. Then I thought the yaa buts will be a distant memory and what sticks in everyone's head is the SB winner. I also believe that going through the likes of Colts, Chargers, Patriots etc will be easier from a match up and psychological perspective. I chose Option 2

So don't delay, act now, supplies are running out Allow if you're still alive, six to eight years to arrive And if you follow there may be a tomorrow But if the offer's shunned You might as well be walking on the Sun

South Florida was hot today, around midday under the sun. Clouds should help some Sunday

JD Vance has nothing. You better come up with a better plan than the Heritage Foundations puppet.

Enjoying sushi Takes lots of McDaniel wine Glad they kept the nerd

This post says it all. Are we really going to invest ~60 million a year on interior O linemen? I’ll take Bosa for three years at 20+/per over any of them. I’m thankful for them and I want them but that feeling goes down every dollar over 15m.

Not sure when this popped up, but have to wonder if Quinnen Williams would’ve made more sense for the Colts.

It seems McGovern has been playing through a few injuries this year too if I remember correctly he had a Hand issue in one game and wears that giant elbow brace. With it being a contract year I’m sure he’s playing through everything as much as he can but something I’d keep a close eye on the rest of the year as you don’t want to hand a big new contract to someone whose body is on the verge of falling apart.