All Activity

It's never higher than about a 25% chance even for the greatest teams, so I'd give the Bills about a 20% chance. This is why it is foolish to ever expect a superbowl. The odds are far too low to ever expect it. It's something you hope for, not expect.

I mean, we all pay for it one way or another. At least this is more transparent and direct.

Why would I? After years of abuse, why would this year be different? 13 seconds was the year. Window is shut.

I believe in jinxes. 😐

More confident than usual because on paper it's the easiest path to the number one seed we've had. There's so much luck and randomness involved in those late Divisional and Conference Championship rounds I'd pry go with around a 25% chance to get there. Lower than some on here but much higher than the Vegas betting line.

Dawkins ?

I do believe in the Superbowl. In fact, I KNOW it exists. I watch it every year. As for all your other weird comments, thanks for letting us know.

While we are engaged in our yearly WR complaint session, one of the key members of one of the best WR rooms in the league went on IG and didn't include his starting QB in his personal top 5. It's causing quite the stir this spring as the temperatures begin to rise in South Florida. You can read all about it right here: https://finheaven.com/threads/tyreek-reeking-again.387172/

This isn't going to end well is it?

Average? The Bills scored a point a minute in SuperBowl 25. It was our defense who couldn't stop the Giants offense.

I disagree there. Players say it has an impact and I believe it does. Is the impact huge? Sometimes. In very rare situations. For instance, Jordan Phillips playing really well against the Dolphins for the first couple times we faced them after he came here. Clearly, he had extra motivation and that manifested in his play on the field. Usually, though, the impact is small. But I do think it has an impact. Players are human, and they play a very physical game that causes a lot of mental and physical stress. They use stuff the media or other players/coaches say to get fired up and motivated. They say it has an impact and I believe them. I think this particular case is nothing, though. It is not like the Ramsey situation at all. Nor do I really think Allen was targeting Ramsey in those games. I think there is too much on a QB's plate to be focused on that, but I could be wrong.

I am quite certain there will be a Super Bowl this year. I can feel it in my bones. I have no idea who will be playing in it.

Tim Duncan said it best it takes a lot of luck to win a championship. I'm confident this team has the talent level it just comes down to in the playoffs where the margin for error is slim can they execute against the elite teams? I think they can and will just have to get some luck with health (like every team) and hope positive player development continues to occur.

Yes! Finally an area where I can weigh in as an expert. Here's my rankings: Jackson #94 - A+. Scorching. One of the best EDGE numbers, should look great on him, and I don't mind the connection to the Aaron Schobel legacy. Hancock #37 - A+. Oh my, yes. The Nate Odomes Classic is one of the best numbers for the secondary. It works great for boundary CBs, nickel CBs, and safeties. Which also fits well with Hancock, since he'll probably play a bit of everywhere early in his career. Prather #81 - A+. Great fit for a fairly tall deep threat WR who isn't super fast. Just looks right. Great choice, Kaden - no notes. Hawes #85 - A+. Excellent choice for a blocking TE. I would've also accepted 87 or 88. Hairston #31 - A. Solid number, although I wouldn't have minded a number in the 20s for such a fast guy. I'm somewhat of an old curmudgeon on numbers, but I think Hairston could also pull off single digits. Still, 31 should be a nice fit for his frame, and I like that we don't have a lot of prominent #31 already. Opportunity for Hairston to own that number. Walker #96 - A. I was worried he'd try for a single-digit number like in college, which would've been an absolute disaster on his giant frame. (Zero was salvageable because of roundness, but Keon has that locked down already.) A giant like Walker needs a number that won't make him look silly. This might have been the best options available - I think only 99 would be real competition. Lundt #77 - A-. Good fit for his frame; those 7s look good on a tall and lean guy. Very solid choice! I tend to prefer 77 as a defensive number, but it'll look good on a RT as well. Note that my rating will drop to a B+ if Lundt moves inside to G. Sanders #98 - B. I don't love 98 for a quick, penetrating DT, but it's not awful. Would've preferred most other options in the 90s, but at least it's not in the 70s or something gross like that. The 70s are for DEs, not for DTs. Strong #43 - C-. I'm sorry, but 43 is a safety's number. Unless he's planning to switch positions, I can't get behind this.

Depends on the defense. On paper they are better, but will they show it on the field. If they do, then the Bills have an excellent shot to get to the Super Bowl and win it. If not, then it won't happen. Allen plays great but he can't lead the Bills to the Super Bowl by himself as we have seen over the years.

I agree the defense sucked, but at the end of the Chiefs game, the D made two stops, giving the Bills offense two chances to win the game. Great offenses win the game right there. The offense has two chances to win,and failed two times. Yes the defense needs a complete overhaul. Why does the offense get a pass?

I think there is a VERY good chance this is our year. But I've also felt that way the last 3. And it could have been. But we fell short. If we don't at least make the Super Bowl, it's time for new leadership.

i HAVE A GOOD FEELING FOR SURE

I say yes and by a mile. My gf has a double masters in nursing from New York and California (and Ontario). She single handedly kept me motivated last year during the KC stretch. She loves Dion and for good reason, class act and amazing player. Not sure how many fans here like hockey but it’s the same thing. Toronto = Buffalo

Exactly. Josh just loves to play and win. Like all the greats, he's fiercely competitive regardless of the sport or game, and this has been well documented going back to his high school and college years.

While that's mostly true, that still was his mindset and personality, and the Bills in '25 (as per the OP question) would never have someone like him in that room.

He's an absolute stud. He played for my beloved Georgia Bulldogs. He will be missed

If we are talking on the field play only - I'd feel very comfortable with Flutie, slightly less so with Fitz and Orton, and generally okay with Tyrod or Holcomb as caretaker types. And I'd obviously take the version of Bledsoe we saw during the first 8 games of 2002, but nothing thereafter. Some decent backup options when we look at our former QBs through that lens. If we are considering attitude, leadership and likelihood of being a helpful backup, I'd probably focus in on Fitz and Tyrod.

I really hope she does find out. Too many times this happens and then they get away with nothing but a fine or a warning. If they want to stop these nut jobs then prosecute to the fullest extent and make an example out of her.