All Activity

4.72 WR territory? In the 1960s maybe. AJ was a great basketball player too. He’s still not a WR

Gabe Davis and Tre Tucker be ideal for me. For starters I like Tucker. And Gabe Davis can catch the deep ball on occasion which is always nice.

I do, actually. I think Keon has looked rough as a starter and has taken a step back in a Sophomore slump. There's no disputing that. But he's a better blocker (he was actually very good at that this week) and has shown (although very inconsistently) the ability to make some plays, lined up on quality NFL CB's. More often than not, the team's best CB. Shavers has not. He hasn't been making plays lined up against teams 2nd or 3rd CB's. For all his speed, he can not get open any better than Coleman can. If you want someone to get more reps than Coleman, WR6 on the depth chart wouldn't be my first thought. Shavers has shown absolutely nothing to deserve such a promotion. Coleman's the punching bag bc he was supposed to be the guy. But if it were just Coleman providing nothing we wouldn't be nearly as bad off as we are. The truth is, they've all been atrocious at getting open. Even Shakir, as good as he is in the open field and for as shifty as he is, can't get separation. That's why we're seeing so many screen passes at the line. The answer is simply not on the active roster. Best we can hope for is a Trade for the best guy we can get, Kincaid/Palmer getting back to 100%, and elevating Davis when he's ready.

Inflation is always good. The cap is exploding YOY and we soon will play 20 games a year on the way to 25 games. Records will fall. History will be written by the victors.

All in favor of the weekly winner of the scepter getting to use it in the next weeks game say I.

BTJ almost same name as the infamous BTK who terrorized Tulsa OK for 30 years. We get a guy who can be 1/2 that longevity we win the trade.

Cook runs angry always. I’m amazed at his power. He emerges from large piles of defenders. He will have half the D on him, and he keeps churning his legs, steadily moving forward. Want a scary thought experiment? Imagine if how our offense looked if we didn’t have Cook?

Kincaid ran a 4.72 40. That’s WR territory and he did play high school basketball like Keon, who got PT with Izzo. Keon + Kincaid + Allen in basketball vs any 3 on KC.

I saw this too. He took a shot looked like an MCL grade 1. The ACL test confirmed integrity but knees don’t bend that way without a slight tear of the MCL. Could he play? Sure. Will he be 100%? No. I almost prefer he does play as Brashard Smith is a more complete back.

Buffalo Billy G playing Matchmaker?

Not the same position. I think Kincaid of a receiving TE, not a complete TE like Knox. Kincaid is emerging, his blocking is improved. Jackson Hawes has played 194, Kincaid has played 189 snaps. That shows the importance of being a more complete TE. Malik Nabors, Jamar Chase, Jefferson, Nacua, Kincaid- One of these names doesn’t belong lol

I will be very surprised if Pacheco plays vs Bills on Sunday. He avoided the ACL tear, but he almost surely has a sprained MCL. I'll predict he misses 3-4 weeks.

Do you think Shavers would be worse than Coleman? Shavers blocks, can catch, has scored a long TD in the NFL. Coleman is so bad, I don’t see Shavers being worse

Anyone watching this game in London? I will be there and am thinking to try the Fitzrovia Belle, the Bills’ bar.

It's 2:30 a.m. and it's going to the 18th inning. Soon they're going to be getting pitchers from out of the crowd. Wow.

Mad max! Brought the solid hit too

This is the modern day Manning Brady At this age Peyton Manning also had not won a super bowl either there's a lot of good football left in Josh Allen

My main point was that this regular season game against the Cheafs matters far more than previous seasons because a win on Sunday would put us 2.5 games clear of them. Now, in that scenario, it would be improbable (which is what I said earlier) for us to play the Cheafs in the playoffs because (a) they finally have two genuine threats in the AFCW + some other tough opponents and (b) they would be 5-4 after a loss to Buffalo. So on the balance of probabilities, they would be unlikely to be the number one seed and therefore would be a wild card at best. All of our previous playoff meetings with them have been played as a contest between two division winners, so that will probably not be the case this year. So not impossible, but improbable. Especially if we also start as a 5-7 seed - which is NOT improbable given all of our issues + the Pats cupcake schedule.

We are much better at RB, and I would argue we are better at OL.

They also lost their starting RB and #2 CB for a big chunk of last season. I don’t know why some of our fans don’t see that injuries hit every team. We need to stop acting like only Buffalo gets them.

I was with you up until this. Shavers has no business being on the field, period. He's not an NFL caliber WR. He looks decent enough lined up against other Practice Squad players and guys who will be out of the league during the Pre-Season. He's one of only 3 WR's on the roster to dress every game this year and has gone without a catch in 5 of the 7 games. He has not earned more playing time. If you think Coleman has a hard time getting open, you should watch Shavers running routes against actual NFL CB's. The only thing Shavers should be doing is being the first guy out to make room for whomever we Trade for and/or Gabe Davis when he's ready.

Why wouldn’t this happen? KC has started 5-4 before and still ended up in the AFCCG.

Gabe Davis and a 5th round pick.

So you think we're better off with Tyrell Shavers, who has gone without a catch in 5 games while being dressed for all of them? Or Elijah Moore who has a total of 5 catches for 78 yards? Or Curtis Samuel, who's played in only 3 games and has a total of 3 catches for 35 yards? I vehemently disagree with this notion that we're better off not using him when that's what we're getting out of HALF of our WR core.