All Activity

Lawrence O'Donnell nails it. He answers my question - the question Trump and his ilk cannot answer: Why wouldn't the Qatari 747 remain property of the U.S. Government after Trump is gone? The answer: because it's not about the U.S. Government receiving a gift. It's not about Air Force 1. The Qatari 747 would have to be retrofitted to meet all the DOD requirements before it would even be put in service, so who knows how long Trump could even use it as President. No. It's about the plane reverting to the Trump Library when his term ends. A Trump Library run by Trump and his buttkissers, so Trump will be able to fly on the most magnificent flying palace ever to his various personal/post-presidency engagements. In other words, it's about a gift that's personal to Trump, not to the American people.

I dont disagree that some guys can just fall off a cliff, but in a lot of those cases I have gone back and noticed their back end of the previous season was tailing off form their first half of the previous season. Its not an exact science by any measure, and its not always going to be the case, but more to the point Henry showed zilch in terms of slowing down. Even if he was in his prime still, I think it would be foolish to expect another 1900 yard season, those just don't happen very often. But if there is any back capable of 1200-1500 yard seasons still in that Ravens offense at ages 32 and 33 its this guy. He is on another level physically and few have the kind of off season regimen that he does, or even capable of what he does. That being said...I also wouldn't at all be surprised to see a 32 year old RB slow down, its a pretty common wall. Just saying, if there is a RB to bet on to still get a couple highly productive seasons at this age its him.

Been listening to a few pods on the schedule and one of the recurring points I’ve heard is “wish the bye week was a little bit later”. The Eagles had their bye week last year in week 5 and won the Super Bowl. They also (like the Bills) had to play 3 games prior to the Super Bowl and they even won under those conditions. I’m not entirely convinced it matters. The Lions had a bye by winning the NFC last year and they were out in the Divisional round so I think while it may be nice to have it mid-season or perhaps a touch later…not completely necessary in my book.

Like my nuts I didn't support them you ***** for brains. I'm not a lefty you corrupt piece of sh it. I've only posted that about a thousand times but you're too *****en stupid to that. Just Hegseth's someone doesn't like Trump doesn't mean they are a lefty. Grow a brain, your problem is you're sitting on it. You need to draw this in a picture book for these Maga morons on here.

I don’t think for a minute that Poyer meant to hurt Coleman, ( outside of a hard hit) certainly sad that it happened, and F’d up the rest of Colemans season, but we are fans of a gladiator sport, it come with the territory imo, this to shall pass,

If it's a gift to the US government, why doesn't Congress just approve the acceptance of it? Repubs control both houses. Problem solved. Why is it going to his presidential library after he's out of office instead of staying in service? Especially if we spend big money to get it ready as AF-1? What are the chances it actually stays parked at the Presidential library? Sounds more like a thinly disguised personal bribe at this point. Hope that changes as the Constitution seems clear on this.

I was in no way defending Diggs or criticizing Allen, and I'm sure the former was a pain in the ass probably from 2021 on, if not earlier...just was guessing the moment it went from being manageable to a huge distraction.

RFK Jr. Goes Scorched Earth on Democrat Medicaid Lies

Love the effort but you’ve got too much time on your hands

If the Bills start strong, I think it is fairly possible that we will be favorites in all regular season games.

Exactly. Take Rasul Douglas for example. He went from a pretty solid starter for us in 2023 to completely toast in 2024 (and currently out of the league) seemingly overnight. The 30's come at you fast in the NFL.

here's the officials ones from buffalobills.com https://www.buffalobills.com/fans/bills-backers/chapters

Im not as down on Bernard as some seem to be, but if there is a question/case to be made about his contract, it is would the money have benefited the Bills more being spent on Cook. And regardless of anyones opinion on Bernard or what to pay Cook, that is a legit discussion.

Politico and Axios both having admit Trump fears were, once again, overblown by the media. Exhausting. If not for all the fear-mongering on the tariffs, who knows where Trump’s polling would be, because he’s pretty strong right now on everything else. And Dems know it, which is why we have to deal with this idiotic Qatari airplane leading the A-bloc on these low grade propaganda shows.

I thought Ben & Jerry were all about the real full fat experience. Doesn't R.F. "Beef Tallow" Kennedy Jr. like that?

Butch Rolle is coming out of retirement to catch nothing but touchdowns and then give you a wedgie

We were cool twenty years ago…, 🤣

Justice Thomas Destroys the Case for Nationwide Injunctions With One Devastating Question Matt Margolis During Supreme Court oral arguments in the Trump v. CASA, Washington, and New Jersey cases, Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a surgical takedown of the legal rationale for nationwide injunctions, using just one line. The case centers around whether lower courts can issue sweeping injunctions that block federal policies nationwide, even when only a handful of plaintiffs are before the court. Representing the United States, Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that such broad orders violate established legal norms and Supreme Court precedent. “We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wirtz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction,” Sauer told the Court. “There’s a dispute about Perkins against Lukens Oil going back to 1940. And of course, we point to the Court’s opinion that reversed that universal injunction issued by the D.C. Circuit and said it’s profoundly wrong.” Sauer continued, listing key precedents that have rejected expansive injunctive relief. “If you look at the cases that either party cite, you see a common theme. The cases that we cite — like National Treasury Employees Union, Perkins, Frothingham, and Massachusetts v. Mellon, going back to Scott v. Donald — in all of those, those are cases where the Court considered and addressed the sort of universal — well, in that case, statewide — provision of injunctive relief.” He emphasized, “When the Court has considered and addressed this, it has consistently said, ‘You have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs appearing in court and complaining of that remedy.’” That’s when Justice Thomas stepped in and cut through the legal weeds with a devastatingly simple observation. “So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunction?” he asked. Sauer didn’t hesitate: “That’s exactly correct. And in fact, those were very limited, very rare, even in the 1960s.” He went on to explain that nationwide injunctions didn’t truly explode until 2007. “In our cert petition in Summers v. Rhode Island Institute, we pointed out that the Ninth Circuit had started doing this in a whole bunch of cases involving environmental claims.” Thomas’s concise question — “So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunction?” — hit the heart of the issue. With that simple question, he challenged the idea that such drastic judicial remedies were historically essential, even during one of the most tumultuous and morally urgent periods in American history: the civil rights era, a time when federal courts began issuing broader remedies to dismantle Jim Crow laws and enforce desegregation. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/05/15/justice-thomas-destroys-case-for-nationwide-injunctions-with-one-devastating-question-n4939815

I thought this answer might have come up sooner. My pizza will sit on the counter as I graze off of it after the initial meal. Eventually I stop grazing, and the box ends up in the trash in the morning. No food safety issues in my experience, and I’ve been doing it a long time. I know where I got my last delivered pizza from (the guy’s originally from Grand Island), but I’m not sure how many years it’s been. If the wife mostly just eats pizza we make at home. Other than that it’s a cheap lunch to stop for a slice. That’s all the pizza I need. There are a few places with pizza that people love, but they only do a whole pie. We would need a crowd at the house to do that. .

W can crown billstime The King of Derangement.

Yea agree. I don't think it is at all the case that you always see signs the previous year. It often happens fast. I'm not saying it will happen to Henry. But I would not be shocked if this year he gets nicked up and slows some and isn't the force of 2024.

Wasn't he also our FB, when rarely used?