All Activity

Only reason he is not on ignore is because he spews some of the craziest takes on here that I am amazed and have to read.

It's null and void. Unless they move the Super Bowl to December.

The Oliver Woofing Theorem is timeless

So much for the agree to disagree offer I threw out multiple times I see lol. Or maybe they don't want to pay a guy as much as he wants who couldn't stop anyone on this forum in the run game? A team with cap issues as it is. And lets not pretend Dallas has a good FO either. Doesn't mean they won't pay Parsons, but this is NOT the same thing as Commanders and Terry. The Commanders have a rookie contract, one that will be IN PLACE the ENTIRETY of the new deal Terry wants. So cap is NOT an issue with the Commanders, its 100% simply what they are WILLING to pay him - and so far, they have not been wiling to get close to his demands to the point a trade has not been requested. If they were at least close, I doubt it gets to a public trade demand. And we are talking about a team with a 2nd year QB, with huge expectations. The last thing they would want is their top WR missing valuable time with the team on such an important sophmore season. YET - here they are, unwilling to budge to the point Terry has requested a trade. SF went through this same dilemma with Aiyuk. Then caved under the pressure of a potential SB roster to immediately regret it and have to get rid of Deebo and still tried to trade Aiyuk again after they paid him and Purdy. That is what happens when you pay a guy above what his tier of player he is. Aiyuk is a good player, but he isn't in the elite tier either. And now signing Aiyuk has cost them Deebo - and SF has a much better W/L record with Deebo than without, more so than any other player on the offense outside the QB. With Deebo their W/L is .642 and in the 19 games he was hurt it is .421 which no other player other than QB has impacted their win % as much as Deebo has, not even CMC. Niners no longer have Deebo, a guy who has been very important to their offense including losing every game he has missed since 2023, because they caved on Aiyuk. There are consequences to these deals. And at the same time, they don't magically make you score more points either. Meanwhile Bengals with a lethal duo of Chase and Higgins for their elite QB to play with haven't made the playoffs the past 2 seasons and have the same amount of Lombardi trophies Allen has. And the one time they made the SB, it wasn't because of the offense which was pedestrian in both the AFCCG and Super Bowl, it was their defense the held KC to just 3 points in the 2nd half allowing the offense to do just enough to win. Then in the SB, the game ended in Burrows hands with that elite WR group to throw to.

I agree...you offer AJE and a couple of 1sts and Jerry's hanging up the phone and laughing. Rousseau gets him to listen. Epenesa is nothing more than Kelsay.

I know, who cares the President is comforting a child sex trafficker?

I sent you a challenge. (I'm bikopuccinni.) I made it three days, but I usually move within a few hours. No worries if that's still too slow for you.

Parsons would be what we want would force qbs to make mistakes and our defense to get stops. I dont see KC's tackles or Bengals OL being able to stop him. Would have a much bigger impact than a WR

Does acknowledgment of the counter jinx counter said counter jinx? What have you done?!?!?

It will just end up being another Myles Garrett situation anyway

I have family in the Bay area, so if I'm physically able, I'm going. I went to the last Super Bowl at Levi's when Denver beat Carolina.

We dont need Parsons !! We have Terrell Bernard !!

original idea of 1st + Epenesa isn't enough 1st Conditional 1st Epenesa toss something else in

He isn't going anywhere but that's a lot harsher than a lot of other trade requests

Thank you! I have to believe this will help at least a little bit!

I love to fish. I was going to go this afternoon after work but we're getting storms....kinda pissed out it. I've been looking forward to it since yesterday.

Just skinny legs

Not the point. What I’m addressing is the notion that Burrow is as talented as Josh, not whether the Bills’ defense let them down.

But that doesn’t mean that’s going to cause salary cap problems. It’s a benefit of those players, sure. especially if they hit insane ceilings early. By the same token, would you rather have random mid tier FAs/other draft picks in the roles of Kincaid, Elam and Hairston and have Parsons instead? I would. Do I think that would cause massive salary cap problems outside of Parson’s own cost? I don’t. First round picks aren’t playing on peanuts and we are never picking higher than 25. Those picks are pretty much lower ceiling compared to the rest of the first round and not that cheap. I get it. Next year, pick 28 could be a player as good as Parsons and be 10x cheaper. And thats very valuable. But it’s much more likely they just won’t be as good/valuable as Micah.

I want to say I agree.. no way they trade him, but Tom Pelliserro is reporting they’ve had preliminary trade talks with teams about him dating back to last year .. and other reporters are already mentioning frameworks of a deal they’d need.

A George Will style Conservative, ya, maybe Too funny!

The Miami Sentinel wrote an entire article with Tua not throwing an INT in camp lol It's a pay site and I'm not a part of it but I guarantee they are hyping him throwing TD's too. Gotta spin it! https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2025/07/30/dolphins-tua-hasnt-thrown-an-int-in-camp-but-he-judges-practice-off-o