All Activity

“What is the mathematical formula you used to form your opinion ☝️🤓”

he was incredibly racist, sexist, and the center of a lot of divisiveness he was incredibly racist, sexist, and the center of a lot of divisiveness links? or more feelings? you're a dimwit for posting your political ignorance using JA's likeness.

“Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword." Matthew 26:52

Trying to make the leftists the victims with this statement?

McD's coverage schemes on the backend are more complex than anything Rex ran. Now Rex's D was more complex up front, that is fair. They are just different styles.

Have you been on any social media platform other than this board? Cause if you have you’d know that’s a complete lie.

Did you watch his entire comments on that specific issue or did you just watch a clip out of context that told you what to think? He said that in the context of DEI, where airlines were purposely forcing quotas of minority pilots. This begs the obvious question if they are cutting corners and hiring under qualified pilots in order to fill a DEI quota. Wrong.

Meanwhile, in an office at stately One Bills Drive, "Extension? You call that an extension?! Ms. Helfinger, get me a pen, and hold my beer!"

There is no link because the study was unpublished. It was also heavily flawed. RFK Jr. ally’s ‘smoking gun’ study on vaccines and chronic illness is fundamentally flawed "The most glaring problem is detection bias, which occurs when one group gets examined more frequently than another, leading to more diagnoses regardless of actual disease rates. In the Henry Ford data, vaccinated children had substantially more health care visits than unvaccinated children. Conditions requiring clinical evaluation to diagnose — ADHD, learning disorders, speech delays, ear infections — will inevitably be recorded more often in the frequently seen group. Yet the authors never correct for this gap. Their only check was to drop children who never had a single encounter with a health care provider, which still leaves one group averaging seven visits a year and the other averaging two. That doesn’t level the playing field; it simply bakes the bias into the results. What they’re measuring is exposure to medical observation, not the effects of vaccines." "Take the claim of a six- to eight-fold increase in ear infections among vaccinated children. This is medically implausible but perfectly explained by detection bias. A child who rarely sees a clinician won’t have “otitis media” coded in their record, even if they’ve had ear pain. While untreated ear infections can resolve on their own, they subject children to unnecessary pain, potential hearing damage, and risk of complications like mastoiditis or meningitis. The study repeatedly conflates absence of diagnosis with absence of disease." The statistical red flags accumulate. The authors report near-zero cases of common conditions like ADHD and learning disabilities among thousands of unvaccinated children. Data show these conditions affect roughly 11% and 9% of children, respectively. Finding essentially none suggests these conditions went undiagnosed and unrecorded in children who rarely saw doctors. In several categories, hazard ratios can’t even be calculated because all cases occur in the vaccinated group — exactly what happens when diagnoses are missed in the comparison group. Properly conducted vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated comparisons look very different from the Henry Ford analysis. A 2014 meta-analysis of more than 1.25 million children published in Vaccine found no link between vaccines and autism. Denmark’s nationwide registry studies found no association with type 1 diabetes or autism. A study published in the Journal of Pediatrics confirmed these findings. Germany’s nationally representative KiGGS study of 13,453 children, including 94 completely unvaccinated, found no meaningful differences in chronic conditions when appropriate methods were used. Rinse and repeat: US vaccine hearing on unpublished study debates same myths Zervos and the other authors of the study were not present at the hearing. The study, which has never been peer-reviewed, is not currently available to the public as a pre-print or in any other form. Scott went on to explain that “the study reports zero ADHD cases among 1,000s of unvaccinated children. How is that possible with a national prevalence at 11%? That’s highly unlikely, unless conditions went undiagnosed.” Scott noted that the study also claimed a six to eightfold increase in ear infections among vaccinated children, but there is no plausible scientific explanation as to why vaccines would increase ear infections. This finding is consistent with past research showing that parents who do not vaccinate their children are also less likely to have their children treated for health conditions in the medical system. Conditions that were not diagnosed or treated would not have shown up in the study, which relied on medical records, according to hearing testimony. As a point of comparison, Scott referenced a Danish study published this July in Annals of Internal Medicine which investigated whether childhood vaccines were linked to 50 different conditions, including many of the same conditions from the unpublished study, like ADHD, autism, asthma, food allergies and eczema. The Danish study looked at outcomes in over a million vaccinated children and 15,000 unvaccinated children, while the unpublished study looked at 18,500 vaccinated children and 2,000 unvaccinated children, according to hearing testimony. The Danish study found no statistically significant increase in risk for any of the conditions investigated, and that vaccinated children experienced lower rates of certain conditions, like ulcerative colitis. Some graphics that Johnson shared left out critical information. For example, a line chart he introduced accurately showed that measles death rates had already begun to decline significantly before vaccines were introduced in the 1960s, due to other factors like improved sanitation, healthcare access and nutrition, but the chart stops in 1960. After vaccines were introduced and widely adopted, both measles cases and death rates declined to nearly zero. Measles was effectively eliminated in the US in 2000, but cases re-emerged when vaccine adoption decreased. There have been 35 measles outbreaks in 2025, according to the CDC. At least two US children and one adult have died of measles this year.

It's hard for younger people today to imagine how easy it was to travel back and forth between Canada and the US back then. We took crossing an international border without a second thought. A bunch of us would go to Ft Erie a couple of times a month for Chinese food at Happy Jack's, which is still on Niagara Blvd a half century later BTW. People went for gas. They went to play bingo. They went camping at Sherkston. Some Buffalonians owned cottages around Ft Erie and along Lake Erie towards Crystal Beach. School kids went on field trips to the attractions in Niagara Falls, ON or to the Toronto Zoo or the Ontario Science Center. Kids from the West Side of Buffalo would ride their bikes across the Peace Bridge to fish. A friend and I went on a vacation in the Thousand Islands/Adirondaks back in the 1970s, and we drove across a totally unguarded/unmanned border crossing somewhere between Massena (we stopped to see the locks) and Plattsburgh. There was a little building like a toll booth with a couple windows and a door and a sign that said something like "Welcome to Quebec/Bienvenue Quebec". Not a soul around but us, so we went through.

So barbaric and evil. He was just 31. Left behind a beautiful wife and two young children.

What number of twitter likes makes an opinion relevant enough to even give a second thought? How many tens of tweets do you need to see before you feel like you have the pulse on half the nation?

You’re right, we should’ve put up some signs saying “gun free zone”, that would’ve totally prevented this.

Me and the old garage band having fun. Song we wrote 40 years ago Apologies in advance lol. Me in the Bills hat with terrible vocals

I compare this more to Rex's schemes in New York effectivity around 2009-10. Those were more complicated to run, but needed the exact right players who had the smarts and physical ability. I think we're trending closer to that in Buffalo, except I don't see that McD's defensive scheme as so complex. Still needs a certain kind of player, which he found in 2017 for the secondary. Huge win or not on Sunday night, we're still debating the philosophy the HC and GM operate under. As in, whether a highly-resourced defense, particularly at DL combined with an offense featuring Josh, a very good OL, and an average-ish skilled talent group can win a SB. Buffalo's 2025 will answer that question.

He said that if he saw a black pilot he would question if the guy was qualified...he was not "just having conversations" he was incredibly racist, sexist, and the center of a lot of divisiveness in our country. Nobody should ever face this kind of despicable act - but I am not going to just pretend he was "just having conversations" with the subjects he stood on.

Thank you. However, PPP is firmly wedged up the ass of the Internet's perpetual outrage machine.

This is awful. anyone who celebrates a man being killed for his political ideology is sick. That is how I describe this event it is sickening. disgusting. Abhorant. WRONG NO BUT's . when it comes to violent rhetoric the more one side points the finger at your opponent guess what. Your thumb is pointing back at you. its proven right on this board. in this thread . Righteous indignation with a heap of HATE towards "the enemy" aka those who aren't in line with MAGA Booth have crazy violent people in their ranks. Hate crosses all political lines. HELLO. @-@

Where are you coming from?

Man you are one delusional guy. But you also once said PFF is “scientific” so we know your intelligence level.

I'm always very measured, calm, in all my comments, across the entire TSW board. But this is truly sick, you a-hole m-fer. If you want to find that "good guy"....well, I won't say anymore.