Buffalo716 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Augie said: I’m honestly surprised that we don’t see this more. Anything along the sideline you just try to carry him OB. Changing that rule took away one of those gray area calls, and defenses should take more advantage of it, imo. Well played, Cole! My father has always said as soon as a player leaves the air I would pick them up and carry them right out He's a crafty old man 2 Quote
TheBrownBear Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I was at a season opener against Jacksonville where we lost on the last play because of the old rule. Ugh. 1 Quote
Tommy Shelby Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Bishop is a waste of draft pick. Terrible Oh wait... we're not doing that anymore... Coleman's slow.... 😂 Back to our regularly scheduled programming. 1 Quote
MJS Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Buffalo716 said: Yep noticed that live it was a great play Back in the day that would have been called a force out and they will give you the catch.. now you're allowed to carry guys straight out That was one of the best rule changes of the past few decades. That along with getting rid of penalties for crowd noise. 1 Quote
Steve Billieve Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, 947 said: I can't wait for a defender to catch a guy mid-air who goes up for a ball 10 yards from the sideline & walk him out of bounds while he struggles to get his feet on the ground. It's technically not against the rules. it's not easy trying to carry a struggling person with 10 other guys trying to knock you down. 7 minutes ago, Tommy Shelby said: Bishop is a waste of draft pick. Terrible Oh wait... we're not doing that anymore... Coleman's slow.... 😂 Back to our regularly scheduled programming. That has taken on a new context at this point 1 Quote
Jay_Fixit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Buffalo716 said: Yep noticed that live it was a great play Back in the day that would have been called a force out and they will give you the catch.. now you're allowed to carry guys straight out I as well noticed it, but it was on the broadcast and it was a great play. 1 Quote
Allen2Moulds Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Honestly, he's starting to stack up so many good plays, that you start to miss some. Quote
colin Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said: I was at a season opener against Jacksonville where we lost on the last play because of the old rule. Ugh. 2004, right? that and the pittz loss cost us a shot at the playoffs, we were 9-7 w bledsoe, and we went from killer o w no d to killer d w no o. i was big on bishop out of the draft (not based on much, im not a big ncaa footy fan), but i felt bad about him when he wasn't playing so well. am i supposed to brag about "scouting" him, or eat crow for doubting him? Quote
BillsShredder83 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, BuffaloBillyG said: Good football IQ and awareness there. Bishop could be a very good player for a very long time. The one rule change that I can think of in "recent history" that wasnt against the defense. Now that I think about it, couldve been 15-20 year ago... but I vividly remember at one point, this wouldve been called a catch for carrying the guy out of bounds LOL Now that I think even more.... Cole is so young, this might've been the rule as far back as when he first played football hahahahahahahah 31 minutes ago, 947 said: I can't wait for a defender to catch a guy mid-air who goes up for a ball 10 yards from the sideline & walk him out of bounds while he struggles to get his feet on the ground. It's technically not against the rules. Just put the WR on your hip between the hashes, like he's my 2 year old on his way to time out 🤣 please God make this happen!! 16 minutes ago, MJS said: That was one of the best rule changes of the past few decades. That along with getting rid of penalties for crowd noise. WHAAAAAAAAT ?!?!? Quote
Beck Water Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Buffalo716 said: Yep noticed that live it was a great play Back in the day that would have been called a force out and they will give you the catch.. now you're allowed to carry guys straight out I find it an improvement - I loathed the second-guessing about whether the player would have been in or out without the defender. 2 Quote
Scott7975 Posted 23 minutes ago Posted 23 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Thurman#1 said: I took a look and nobody seems to have mentioned this. Including the game announcers. On Tampa's second attempt at a 2 point conversion, Sterling Shepard made the catch but out of bounds. But he would've been inbounds except for the beautiful play by Bishop. Shepard went up two or three yards from the boundary and was going to come down in bounds but Bishop was right behind him and he just carried him right out of bounds so he couldn't get even one foot in. Happened at 13:35 in the fourth quarter, and held the Tampa Bay lead to one point instead of three. It was a really nice play. Didn't turn out to be important. But it could have. Beautiful play with good awareness, body control, speed and strength. Yes, it was another great play by Bishop. The announcers did show it though. Quote
Buffalo716 Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago (edited) 1 hour ago, BillsShredder83 said: The one rule change that I can think of in "recent history" that wasnt against the defense. Now that I think about it, couldve been 15-20 year ago... but I vividly remember at one point, this wouldve been called a catch for carrying the guy out of bounds LOL Now that I think even more.... Cole is so young, this might've been the rule as far back as when he first played football hahahahahahahah Just put the WR on your hip between the hashes, like he's my 2 year old on his way to time out 🤣 please God make this happen!! WHAAAAAAAAT ?!?!? That was a short-lived penalty a long time ago which I don't believe they actually really threw penalties for... maybe a couple times Edited 22 minutes ago by Buffalo716 Quote
ChronicAndKnuckles Posted 12 minutes ago Posted 12 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Sojourner said: lol and I read he was going to be absolute rubbish and we needed replacements for both Rapp and him by the general consensus. Then was repeatedly lambasted for holding reservations after one break out game… Full circle and the dichotomy of TBD! Do think he’s going to be a decent starter. He’s been consistent these last 4 games. That’s all I can ask for a player. Be consistently dependable. Like Belichick used to say. “Do Your Job”. Exactly! Terrell Bernard should’ve been a lesson for this board in not jumping to conclusions too quickly and give a player time to learn the defense and NFL speed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.