Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Ya Digg? said:

You’re describing literally every big business there is, it’s not just a Bills/Las Vegas thing. I’m honestly trying to think of something popular now (or even a necessity like flying) that hasn’t priced out the average American/family. I just read today that it now costs an average of $4000-$10,000 for a family of 4 to go to Disney for 5 days 

As someone who is a family of 5 doing their first ever vacation and it's to Disney next year, I can confirm.

And we're going 5 days, but parks only for 3 - and park day passes are by far the most expensive part of the trip. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 hours ago, DeepPass said:

It's not hard to observe the Corporate strategies at these two destinations.

 

Las Vegas isn't about cheap food, inexpensive drinks and living like a king for a few days of gambling anymore.  With $16 Budweiser's, resort fees higher than room rates and $150 buffets the 'average' tourist is being priced out.  The Corporations that run Las Vegas are making higher profits with less people coming to town.  The wealthy and high rollers are  now their target guests.

 

It seems to me the Bills are using the same strategy with the new stadium.  Fewer seats, seat licenses and much higher ticket prices are making it difficult for the 'average' fan to attend a game.  The people that filled the 80,000 seats in Rich Stadium and now 70,000 seats are being left out.  They aren't needed anymore!  The Bills will make more profit with fewer fans to deal with.

 

I think we'll miss the days of raucous, crazy fans cheering on the Bills!

I'm hoping they come up with a parking lot party area to watch games outside the stadium. Get creative with it, charge some to get in, make it a fun experience for those who can't afford to go in the stadium but still want to enjoy the gameday atmosphere with fellow Bills fans. Make it big enough to hold a couple thousand fans. Maybe have some similarities of being in stadium with bleachers and standing areas. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 hours ago, DeepPass said:

It's not hard to observe the Corporate strategies at these two destinations.

 

Las Vegas isn't about cheap food, inexpensive drinks and living like a king for a few days of gambling anymore.  With $16 Budweiser's, resort fees higher than room rates and $150 buffets the 'average' tourist is being priced out.  The Corporations that run Las Vegas are making higher profits with less people coming to town.  The wealthy and high rollers are  now their target guests.

 

It seems to me the Bills are using the same strategy with the new stadium.  Fewer seats, seat licenses and much higher ticket prices are making it difficult for the 'average' fan to attend a game.  The people that filled the 80,000 seats in Rich Stadium and now 70,000 seats are being left out.  They aren't needed anymore!  The Bills will make more profit with fewer fans to deal with.

 

I think we'll miss the days of raucous, crazy fans cheering on the Bills!

Never underestimate Bill's Mafia

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
17 hours ago, DeepPass said:

It's not hard to observe the Corporate strategies at these two destinations.

 

Las Vegas isn't about cheap food, inexpensive drinks and living like a king for a few days of gambling anymore.  With $16 Budweiser's, resort fees higher than room rates and $150 buffets the 'average' tourist is being priced out.  The Corporations that run Las Vegas are making higher profits with less people coming to town.  The wealthy and high rollers are  now their target guests.

 

It seems to me the Bills are using the same strategy with the new stadium.  Fewer seats, seat licenses and much higher ticket prices are making it difficult for the 'average' fan to attend a game.  The people that filled the 80,000 seats in Rich Stadium and now 70,000 seats are being left out.  They aren't needed anymore!  The Bills will make more profit with fewer fans to deal with.

 

I think we'll miss the days of raucous, crazy fans cheering on the Bills!

I went on ticket master to look at ticket prices for some of the games coming to Buffalo because I'd like to go to 1 last game at the Ralph and the cheapest tickets I could find in the nose bleed section started at $362.00 . 

 

My cousin has a friend that is a season ticket holder in the nose bleed section that isn't going to 1 of the games and wants to sell their tickets so he told me and I said yah ill take, them they wanted $700 for 2 tickets I guess that's the going rate .

 

But when I dug a little deeper I found a price that was nearly $400 a ticket which was a resale ticket and was originally on sale for $89 I believe it was .

Posted
On 10/5/2025 at 2:23 PM, T master said:

I went on ticket master to look at ticket prices for some of the games coming to Buffalo because I'd like to go to 1 last game at the Ralph and the cheapest tickets I could find in the nose bleed section started at $362.00 . 

 

My cousin has a friend that is a season ticket holder in the nose bleed section that isn't going to 1 of the games and wants to sell their tickets so he told me and I said yah ill take, them they wanted $700 for 2 tickets I guess that's the going rate .

 

But when I dug a little deeper I found a price that was nearly $400 a ticket which was a resale ticket and was originally on sale for $89 I believe it was .

A family of 4 going to a game at $362 per ticket is crazy.  Insane.  $1500 plus parking and food is vacation money!

  • Agree 2
Posted

The smaller capacity is not that big a deal.  I'm sure they could sell 75-80,000 seats today because the Bills are a white hot commodity in the Josh Allen era.  But it's not too long ago at all there would be swaths of upper deck seats empty.  Anyway, even in the lean years at the new stadium (over the next 30 years) there will still be demand. 

 

The Bears Stadium today only holds 61,500.   Detroit, Vegas, Arizona and Washington are all less than 65,000.  Miami, Cinci, Minnesota, New Eng and Indy are all in the 65-67K range.  I'm tired of hearing how the Bills screwed over the fans by lowering capacity.. Jeez, buy a season ticket or save up and buy some tickets on the secondary market, stop complaining and enjoy.  This ain't Dallas or Los Angeles here.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, zow2 said:

The smaller capacity is not that big a deal.  I'm sure they could sell 75-80,000 seats today because the Bills are a white hot commodity in the Josh Allen era.  But it's not too long ago at all there would be swaths of upper deck seats empty.  Anyway, even in the lean years at the new stadium (over the next 30 years) there will still be demand. 

 

The Bears Stadium today only holds 61,500.   Detroit, Vegas, Arizona and Washington are all less than 65,000.  Miami, Cinci, Minnesota, New Eng and Indy are all in the 65-67K range.  I'm tired of hearing how the Bills screwed over the fans by lowering capacity.. Jeez, buy a season ticket or save up and buy some tickets on the secondary market, stop complaining and enjoy.  This ain't Dallas or Los Angeles here.

Realistically the bills did not screw out any fans 

 

We've all been there when our season tickets you couldn't give them away let alone sell them for $25 

 

We've all been there when the upper bowl had plenty of seats unopened 

 

This is about finding a perfect number.. one that works while the bills are great and not great 

 

Realistically the majority of the stadium is going to be season tickets anyways so anybody else has always been paying more

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 10/5/2025 at 7:05 AM, SoCal Deek said:

Keep in mind that back when the Bills began, the players bagged groceries in the offseason. I highly doubt that you’ll see either Josh or his starlet wife working the produce section at Wegmans this spring. 

My dad worked at the airport back in those early days. He'd have stories about the Bills player loading bags back then. The exception was Cookie Gilchrist, who always acted 100% The Star.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said:

My dad worked at the airport back in those early days. He'd have stories about the Bills player loading bags back then. The exception was Cookie Gilchrist, who always acted 100% The Star.

Even in 1965 in the AFL.. a rookies salary was $9,000 which is equivalent to almost $100,000 today

 

If they worked extra jobs it's because they wanted to not because they actually had to 

 

That's a misconception that they weren't getting paid enough.. in 65 they're getting paid way more than your average job

Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo716 said:

Even in 1965 in the AFL.. a rookies salary was $9,000 which is equivalent to almost $100,000 today

 

If they worked extra jobs it's because they wanted to not because they actually had to 

 

That's a misconception that they weren't getting paid enough.. in 65 they're getting paid way more than your average job

I looked it up ... the AFL's minimum salary was 9K for rookies, 10K for vets.

But that didn't come until a CBA was ratified in 1968.

Yes, even 9K was a very handsome salary back then, but it wasn't that way in the early 1960s.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
On 10/5/2025 at 9:05 AM, SoCal Deek said:

Keep in mind that back when the Bills began, the players bagged groceries in the offseason. I highly doubt that you’ll see either Josh or his starlet wife working the produce section at Wegmans this spring. 

Is his wife really a starlet or a wanna-be starlet?  She appears with Josh in a tight dress with her boobs pushed out.  Is that what a starlet does?? I don't know if Josh likes that much!

  • Dislike 1
Posted
On 10/5/2025 at 9:05 AM, SoCal Deek said:

Keep in mind that back when the Bills began, the players bagged groceries in the offseason. I highly doubt that you’ll see either Josh or his starlet wife working the produce section at Wegmans this spring. 

Not true. Matt Milano was at the Italian deli I go to slicing gabagool Sunday morning before his game.
 

Maybe he doesn’t work there and was just getting a sandwich to go you’re sayin’?

Posted
36 minutes ago, DeepPass said:

Is his wife really a starlet or a wanna-be starlet?  She appears with Josh in a tight dress with her boobs pushed out.  Is that what a starlet does?? I don't know if Josh likes that much!

Say what now? Haylee’s been in Hollywood since before Josh was in high school! 

Posted
On 10/4/2025 at 10:18 PM, loyal2dagame said:

 

In line with pricing people out, it's funny that TKO, who owns the UFC and WWE, came out and said that Vince McMahon priced his product for families and TKO is increasing prices for maximum profit. The tickets for John Cena's final match are $8500 for floor seats and $250 for nose bleeds. 

 

 

I heard they're also moving a Wrestlemania to Saudi Arabia. They must've been offered an absurd amount of money to do that, especially with the PR backlash that'll receive. 

 

Imagine if the NFL announced the 2028 was being moved to Saudi Arabia. Fans would lose their minds.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BigDingus said:

 

I heard they're also moving a Wrestlemania to Saudi Arabia. They must've been offered an absurd amount of money to do that, especially with the PR backlash that'll receive. 

 

Imagine if the NFL announced the 2028 was being moved to Saudi Arabia. Fans would lose their minds.

If the divas fight will it be in burkas?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...