Putin Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Odunze would be the reason we move to 9 If he’s makes a huge impact go get him 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 We get Odunze, what did it cost? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 5 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: 28, 60, 128, 144, 2025 1st for 9 ? Yeah we don't need young players on the team, let's just not draft at all. This is awful 1 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadBills Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 2 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said: Yeah we don't need young players on the team, let's just not draft at all. This is awful Absolutely no way I’m giving up the whole draft and next years first for number 9 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 25 minutes ago, bigduke6 said: Josh is in his prime. swing for the fences. if you can reach one of the big 3 for decent value, do it. ive heard Beane only has 15 prospects labeled as actual 1st round grades. assuming the top 3 WRs are in there, go get one. we need a difference maker, not a wait and see. So I guess the right thing to do is either move up and get that stud WR or trade back 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 3 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said: Yeah we don't need young players on the team, let's just not draft at all. This is awful Where exactly do we have holes? Safety? Maybe? GET AN ELITE WR 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 3 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said: Yeah we don't need young players on the team, let's just not draft at all. This is awful Like who? What other needs do we have that can't be filled with the other 6 picks we'd still have this year, free agency, and next year's picks? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, BigBadBills said: Absolutely no way I’m giving up the whole draft and next years first for number 9 the whole draft? We’d still have a bunch of picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, BigBadBills said: Absolutely no way I’m giving up the whole draft and next years first for number 9 The whole draft? Am I missing something? We end up with 7 picks this year in that scenario. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo44 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: the whole draft? We’d still have a bunch of picks. Start with 10, trade 4, get 1 = 7, the average for a team. Edited April 25 by Turbo44 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 13 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: 28, 60, 128, 144, 2025 1st for 9 ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Putin said: Hard to fill immediate needs in free agency with a food stamps card The Bills made their choices. It didn’t have to be that way. Also the position they are in has nothing to do with optimal off-season strategy. Edited April 25 by BarleyNY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKBillFan Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, Rock-A-Bye Beasley said: The whole draft? Am I missing something? We end up with 7 picks this year in that scenario. With the highest at 160. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Mantis_Toboggan Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 If I’m Brandon Beane, I’m not moving my 2nd or 3rd rd picks, too much depth at spots of need this year. Id prefer to give up something marginal to move up and secure BTJ in the early 20s, rather than trade the farm to move up for Odunze at 9. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 Just now, BarleyNY said: The Bills made their choices. It didn’t have to be that way. I don’t disagree 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WickedGame Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 My long-shot prediction: Bills trade for DJ Moore. Cost is pick #28 and a mix of later/future picks. Maybe a player (Spencer Brown?) Bills get a proven WR to replace Diggs at a modest $16M cap number for the next two years. Maybe they extend him two years, since he just turned 27 last week. The Bills avoid a roll of the dice on a receiver at 28. They also potentially keep their #2 pick in the deal. If Brown is part of the package they get an RT in the second to compete with Lael Collins. Then we get a WR in the 4th and everything else is depth. The Bears, who have only a few picks, stockpile picks and use #28 to nab the 5th or 6th best WR to be their new #2 WR alongside Odunze or Nabers. Brown would also fill a need for them. They end up with two cost-controlled receivers on 5-year rookie deals to go with their cost-controlled QB, freeing them up for big swings in free agency in 2025. Feasible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, Turbo44 said: 6 to be exaxt and the one at 9, that still counts as a pick right? Or is it a player as soon as it's used. Oh man we're gonna have no picks soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julian Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, UKBillFan said: With the highest at 160. And a blue chip WR…. fu*k yeah !!!!! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 3 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Where exactly do we have holes? Safety? Maybe? GET AN ELITE WR You're right of course, we have such an excellent pass-rush full of young players who will be here a long time. Oh wait, we barely have enough halfway decent DTs and DEs to fill a room and most of them are old. At least we have options at LG and C in the event the guys expected to start there don't play well, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 2 minutes ago, UKBillFan said: With the highest at 160. Are you implying that the earlier picks are more likely to be good players? Like, just for example, the 28th picks versus the 9th pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts