Jump to content

Raiders Hire HC Pierce


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Thrivefourfive said:


Exactly. Plus, Pierce has no head coaching experience. This is beyond risky for the Raiders. I think people get blinded by the success during the interim. That’s no indicator for future success as the head guy beginning day 1. All I’m really saying is that it’s beyond risky, and there are other less riskier moves that could’ve been made.
 

I’d have to think that the Raiders job is very prestigious to NFL men. In Vegas.. come on. This is a dream job.  

He has head coaching experience,  just this past season. That's more experience than many new hires over the years. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s kind of nice to see an interim coach earn themselves the job for once 

6 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

I dont have the time or enrgery to look it up.

But has there ever been an interim guy that then gets the full time job and done really well? 

I'm struggling to recall anyone that actually did well when they first got the job as an interim 

 

 

Note. This is NFL I'm talking. The Michigan basketball coach Steve Fisher that won a NCAA championship as and interim that took over for the Fab 5 may be the greatest interim to HC story in sports history. 

I feel like an interim keeps the job so infrequently that the sample size is too small to comment on either way.  I think marrone was one technically but they probably always planned for him to get a shot at hc 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, klos63 said:

He has head coaching experience,  just this past season. That's more experience than many new hires over the years. 


Was he a coordinator? I don’t know. I’d say being a coordinator from day 1 has more to do with being a head coach than being an interim head coach. I just believe that for an interim, they haven’t created anything—they’re just taking over for an already established thing. 


Love it. Wonder why the Falcons aren’t deciding Antonio Pierce or Bill Belichick? 
 

Anyone here believe that Pierce is a better choice than Bill Belichick for the Raiders? Or for any team? I’d love to hear it. 

Edited by Thrivefourfive
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Thrivefourfive said:


Was he a coordinator? I don’t know. I’d say being a coordinator from day 1 has more to do with being a head coach than being an interim head coach. I just believe that for an interim, they haven’t created anything—they’re just taking over for an already established thing. 


Love it. Wonder why the Falcons aren’t deciding Antonio Pierce or Bill Belichick? 
 

Anyone here believe that Pierce is a better choice than Bill Belichick for the Raiders? Or for any team? I’d love to hear it. 

What are you talking about?

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, billsfan_34 said:

You may be right…the tools are there but Herbert still has a lot of upside

I see the same guy I saw at Oregon, talented, but no “it” factor.  Maybe it’s the terrible coaching, but maybe it’s just the same guy.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

The only other one I have is Marrone in Jax. Took them to an AFCCG but it was a lightening in a bottle season and they disintegrated quickly after. 

 

The one that always stood out as "shoulda" to me is Dan Campbell in Miami. Went 5-7 but his team competed their asses off every week and they passed him over to hire Adam Gase. Major mistake and I was saying it even then. 

Where is Adam Gase now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think hiring head coaches has so much weirdness and luck involved, I’m not going to be too critical unless a team hires a known bad coach (like Josh McDaniels).


This guy had the benefit of the locker room being bought in and overachieving, so that is something.

 

Really doesn’t matter who the HC is if they don’t get a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DCofNC said:

I see the same guy I saw at Oregon, talented, but no “it” factor.  Maybe it’s the terrible coaching, but maybe it’s just the same guy.

Watching him at Oregon,  I also felt that something was missing.  Maybe he was just overhyped. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the question here is whether the players response was tied to the fact that he had the interim title.  As we saw with the Chargers, even bad teams tend to play hard when their head coach gets fired and an interim takes over.

 

Now that he's the full time head coach, will Pierce be able to maintain this?  I honestly don't know.  I do know the Raiders threw a ton of money at Josh McDaniels and so it did seem unlikely that they'd make another run at a Belichick or Harbaugh-type coach that would demand a lot of cash.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/20/2024 at 5:02 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

I think the chance to coach Herbert is no doubt tempting. But it is one of the worst ownership situations in the league. They don't like spending money and they interfere. Worst of both worlds. And Harbaugh is incapable of biting his tongue

 

I think this has been settled my friend 😊

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...