Jump to content

giving the Bucs the short sideline throws on their final possession


dave mcbride

Recommended Posts

The Bucs got the Ball with 21 seconds to go at their own 20. If the Bills had guarded the sidelines instead of giving Mayfield THREE easy throws to the sideline that resulted in clock stoppages, there would have been no (nearly successful) hail mary attempt. My thinking is that if they funneled the easy completion to the middle of the field (20-25 yards downfield), a completion would have ended up running out the clock. A play of that length is going to run 6-7 seconds off the clock, and then all of the players have to race back and get set in 14 seconds before a spike. Mayfield would have been running from the 15 yard line or so. 

 

Point is, the clock was the Bucs main enemy. Allowing them to use the sidelines with ease--with the result being four legit plays with 21 seconds and no timeouts--strikes me as pretty bad tactics.     

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 10
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

The Bucs got the Ball with 21 seconds to go at their own 20. If the Bills had guarded the sidelines instead of giving Mayfield THREE easy throws to the sideline that resulted in clock stoppages, there would have been no (nearly successful) hail mary attempt. My thinking is that if they funneled the easy completion to the middle of the field (20-25 yards downfield), a completion would have ended up running out the clock. A play of that length is going to run 6-7 seconds off the clock, and then all of the players have to race back and get set in 14 seconds before a spike. Mayfield would have been running from the 15 yard line or so. 

 

Point is, the clock was the Bucs main enemy. Allowing them to use the sidelines with ease--with the result being four legit plays with 21 seconds and no timeouts--strikes me as pretty bad tactics.     

I don't know why they don't do this. I said the same thing in the Giants game 2 weeks ago. Play the f*cking sideline. Leave the middle of the field completely open and play far back. They only have 21 seconds. They have to score a TD. Let them have the short middle stuff or even the 15 yard middle stuff. Just keep them in bounce

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally I’d say it’s not a big deal, but Mayfield has the arm to reach the end zone from his own 35-40 yard line.  He’s shown that in the past.  The goal should’ve been staying out of his range to reach the end zone, not taking 4 seconds off clock.  Mac Jones or Deshaun Watson, yeah I’m trading 7-10 yards for 4 seconds there because there’s not enough time for them to reach the end zone.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait for the people who ignore this or combat it with the results mean it doesn't matter.

 

Real depth in their thoughts. Kiddy pool deep.

 

Yesterday our defensive strategy was odd. We let Mayfield nearly beat us. Padded coverage against Mike Evans, Godwin yac, etc. 

 

Poyer as an LB was interesting, though. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

I don't know why they don't do this. I said the same thing in the Giants game 2 weeks ago. Play the f*cking sideline. Leave the middle of the field completely open and play far back. They only have 21 seconds. They have to score a TD. Let them have the short middle stuff or even the 15 yard middle stuff. Just keep them in bounce

I wonder if they’re worried about a 30 yard strike in the middle of the field and then a spike…this is def fair criticism though 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

I wonder if they’re worried about a 30 yard strike in the middle of the field and then a spike…this is def fair criticism though 

With only 20 seconds left and deep in their own territory, I don't care about a 30 yard throw in the middle of the field. By the time they get up there to spike the ball, it would take up a significant amount of time. Better than letting them complete 10 yard sideline passes all the way up the field and stopping the clock

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

I wonder if they’re worried about a 30 yard strike in the middle of the field and then a spike…this is def fair criticism though 

If it was 30 yards (a probable 8 second play), I don't see how Mayfield and all five o-linemen get 35 yards down the field to get down the field and get set in time to spike it.   

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

The Bucs got the Ball with 21 seconds to go at their own 20. If the Bills had guarded the sidelines instead of giving Mayfield THREE easy throws to the sideline that resulted in clock stoppages, there would have been no (nearly successful) hail mary attempt. My thinking is that if they funneled the easy completion to the middle of the field (20-25 yards downfield), a completion would have ended up running out the clock. A play of that length is going to run 6-7 seconds off the clock, and then all of the players have to race back and get set in 14 seconds before a spike. Mayfield would have been running from the 15 yard line or so. 

 

Point is, the clock was the Bucs main enemy. Allowing them to use the sidelines with ease--with the result being four legit plays with 21 seconds and no timeouts--strikes me as pretty bad tactics.     

 

Way too aggressive for McD's taste. He'd rather "play not to lose".

 

Gotta give them those easy sideline gains so they can move down the field and it comes down to the last play. Otherwise it doesnt count.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Way too aggressive for McD's taste. He'd rather "play not to lose".

 

Gotta give them those easy sideline gains so they can move down the field and it comes down to the last play. Otherwise it doesnt count.

But it's not even that aggressive. It's not giving them any chance at all for a successful bomb, to say, the 40 yard line of the Bills (because it would have ended the game anyway without question); it's about treating the clock as your ally.  That seems safer to me.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

But it's not even that aggressive. It's not giving them any chance at all for a successful bomb, to say, the 40 yard line of the Bills (because it would have ended the game anyway without question); it's about treating the clock as your ally.  That seems safer to me.

 

It isnt. Key phrase in my post was "for McD's taste". Infuriating.

 

If one thing has been made clear, it's that McD does not have an alliance with the clock. That is a far more adversarial relationship.

Edited by DrDawkinstein
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Way too aggressive for McD's taste. He'd rather "play not to lose".

 

Gotta give them those easy sideline gains so they can move down the field and it comes down to the last play. Otherwise it doesnt count.

exactly. anyone watching this and not realizing 13 seconds was a thing, the giants game was a thing, the hopkins pass was a thing... this team is prone exactly to this. it's an Achilles heel

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

But it's not even that aggressive. It's not giving them any chance at all for a successful bomb, to say, the 40 yard line of the Bills (because it would have ended the game anyway without question); it's about treating the clock as your ally.  That seems safer to me.

I just don’t think Mcdermott is good at end of game decisions where feeling the flow of the game and specifically factoring in the other teams strengths and weaknesses is more important than analytics that tell you generic percentages.    He’s like the anti Mariano Rivera.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

The Bucs got the Ball with 21 seconds to go at their own 20. If the Bills had guarded the sidelines instead of giving Mayfield THREE easy throws to the sideline that resulted in clock stoppages, there would have been no (nearly successful) hail mary attempt. My thinking is that if they funneled the easy completion to the middle of the field (20-25 yards downfield), a completion would have ended up running out the clock. A play of that length is going to run 6-7 seconds off the clock, and then all of the players have to race back and get set in 14 seconds before a spike. Mayfield would have been running from the 15 yard line or so. 

 

Point is, the clock was the Bucs main enemy. Allowing them to use the sidelines with ease--with the result being four legit plays with 21 seconds and no timeouts--strikes me as pretty bad tactics.     

 

 

The last minute situational stupidity started just before that on ST's with the decision to take the timeout instead of the 5 yard delay of game and then trying to drop the punt inside the 10.    It's not the second quarter.........you don't need to put them at the 2 yard line to preserve the win.   Give Haack the space.   That ball just needs to come down at the 10 yard line.    Make them field it after they fumbled prior.    Instead they go for the pin again and the play ends up in a touchback. :doh:    On a much smaller note,  no reason to waste a timeout there in the event something went haywire and you get the ball back with 13 seconds needing a score.   

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

The Bucs got the Ball with 21 seconds to go at their own 20. If the Bills had guarded the sidelines instead of giving Mayfield THREE easy throws to the sideline that resulted in clock stoppages, there would have been no (nearly successful) hail mary attempt. My thinking is that if they funneled the easy completion to the middle of the field (20-25 yards downfield), a completion would have ended up running out the clock. A play of that length is going to run 6-7 seconds off the clock, and then all of the players have to race back and get set in 14 seconds before a spike. Mayfield would have been running from the 15 yard line or so. 

 

Point is, the clock was the Bucs main enemy. Allowing them to use the sidelines with ease--with the result being four legit plays with 21 seconds and no timeouts--strikes me as pretty bad tactics.     

 

They looked like they were covering deeper on the sideline to prevent longer passes which would have allowed more time for the Bucs. Looked like the middle of the field was left wide open. That's what it looked like from the little bit of the full screen shot you got on TV at least anyway. Yeah, they allowed one Hail Mary attempt, but that was better than allowing 3 of them, or worse, a normal 25-30 yard pass into the endzone.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...