Jump to content

Vivek Ramaswamy for president 2024?


Recommended Posts

Vivek is running the campaign that DeSantis should be running.

 

I think DeSantis has a future in American politics. Dick Nixon ran an awful campaign in 1960 and lost. Ended up coming back and winning in '68. You learn, you grow, these things happen in politics just like in any other field.

 

But these losers that he recruited to spearhead his online/social media and general public perception...yikes.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LeviF said:

Vivek is running the campaign that DeSantis should be running.

 

I think DeSantis has a future in American politics. Dick Nixon ran an awful campaign in 1960 and lost. Ended up coming back and winning in '68. You learn, you grow, these things happen in politics just like in any other field.

 

But these losers that he recruited to spearhead his online/social media and general public perception...yikes.

He's just so awkward though.   That shouldn't matter....we all know it does.  Makes him come off weird and disingenuous.  He doesn't know how to smile or what to do with his hands sometimes.   Is he nervous?

Who knows.  He ain't going far this time round barring some extreme change or event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

He's just so awkward though.   That shouldn't matter....we all know it does.  Makes him come off weird and disingenuous.  He doesn't know how to smile or what to do with his hands sometimes.   Is he nervous?

Who knows.  He ain't going far this time round barring some extreme change or event.

 

Same could have been said of Nixon in '60. The first televised debate against Kenney was an abject disaster. 65 million people saw a sickly, pale old man across from Kennedy. 

 

But yes your analysis is correct. DeSantis has no shot, similar to all the other Republican candidates who will go into Iowa looking to split roughly 45% of the vote between them.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LeviF said:

 

Same could have been said of Nixon in '60. The first televised debate against Kenney was an abject disaster. 65 million people saw a sickly, pale old man across from Kennedy. 

 

But yes your analysis is correct. DeSantis has no shot, similar to all the other Republican candidates who will go into Iowa looking to split roughly 45% of the vote between them.

Someone might have a shot.  If big daddy craps the bed legally.   Then one of the people out of it now will be in.  My guess, if that were to happen , Trumps endorsement would get the nod.  All speculation. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Don’t believe me that the Great Replacement Theory is just the basic immigration policy for the modern Democrat Party? Don’t take it from me, take it from your favorite Democratic politicians and MSM outlets:

• “Blue Wave is African-American. Yeah, it's White, it's Latino, it's Asian Pacific Islander. It is made up of those who've been told that they are not worthy of being here. It is comprised of those who are documented and undocumented.” - Stacey Abrams, 2018 

• “An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me, who are Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017 will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then on will be White European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a source of our strength.” - Joe Biden, 2015

• “The immigration proposal pending in Congress would transform the nation’s political landscape for a generation or more — pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.” - Politico, 2013

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

This is what an *actual* attack on democracy looks like: in an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision, a cabal of Democrat judges are barring Trump from the ballot in Colorado. Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in this election, the bipartisan Establishment is now deploying a new tactic to bar him from ever holding office again: the 14th Amendment. I pledge to *withdraw* from the Colorado GOP primary unless Trump is also allowed to be on the state’s ballot, and I demand that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to do the same immediately - or else they are tacitly endorsing this illegal maneuver which will have disastrous consequences for our country.
 

 Today’s decision is the latest election interference tactic to silence political opponents and swing the election for whatever puppet the Democrats put up this time by depriving Americans of the right to vote for their candidate of choice.  
 

The 14th Amendment was part of the “Reconstruction Amendments” that were ratified following the Civil War. It was passed to prohibit former Confederate military and political leaders from holding high federal or state office. These men had clearly taken part in a rebellion against the United States: the Civil War. That makes it all the more absurd that a left-wing group in Colorado is asking a federal court to disqualify the 45th President on the same grounds, equating his speech to rebellion against the United States.
 

And there’s another legal problem: Trump is not a former “officer of the United States,” as that term is used in the Constitution, meaning Section 3 does not apply. As the Supreme Court explained in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010), an “officer of the United States” is someone appointed by the President to aid him in his duties under Article II, Section 2. The term does not apply to elected officials, and certainly not to the President himself.  
 

 

The Framers of the 14th Amendment would be appalled to see this narrow provision—intended to bar former U.S. officials who switched to the Confederacy from seeking public office—being weaponized by a sitting President and his political allies to prevent a former President from seeking reelection. Our country is becoming unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

This is what an *actual* attack on democracy looks like: in an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision, a cabal of Democrat judges are barring Trump from the ballot in Colorado. Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in this election, the bipartisan Establishment is now deploying a new tactic to bar him from ever holding office again: the 14th Amendment. I pledge to *withdraw* from the Colorado GOP primary unless Trump is also allowed to be on the state’s ballot, and I demand that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to do the same immediately - or else they are tacitly endorsing this illegal maneuver which will have disastrous consequences for our country.
 

 Today’s decision is the latest election interference tactic to silence political opponents and swing the election for whatever puppet the Democrats put up this time by depriving Americans of the right to vote for their candidate of choice.  
 

The 14th Amendment was part of the “Reconstruction Amendments” that were ratified following the Civil War. It was passed to prohibit former Confederate military and political leaders from holding high federal or state office. These men had clearly taken part in a rebellion against the United States: the Civil War. That makes it all the more absurd that a left-wing group in Colorado is asking a federal court to disqualify the 45th President on the same grounds, equating his speech to rebellion against the United States.
 

And there’s another legal problem: Trump is not a former “officer of the United States,” as that term is used in the Constitution, meaning Section 3 does not apply. As the Supreme Court explained in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010), an “officer of the United States” is someone appointed by the President to aid him in his duties under Article II, Section 2. The term does not apply to elected officials, and certainly not to the President himself.  
 

 

The Framers of the 14th Amendment would be appalled to see this narrow provision—intended to bar former U.S. officials who switched to the Confederacy from seeking public office—being weaponized by a sitting President and his political allies to prevent a former President from seeking reelection. Our country is becoming unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.

 

 

 


Vivek is running the campaign desan- … never mind I don’t need to say it again. 
 

DeSantis let his foolish, useless staff trot him down a loser path and flushed hundreds of millions of dollars and tons of political capital down the drain on the way there. Sad!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2023 at 6:28 AM, BillsFanNC said:

 

Don’t believe me that the Great Replacement Theory is just the basic immigration policy for the modern Democrat Party? Don’t take it from me, take it from your favorite Democratic politicians and MSM outlets:

• “Blue Wave is African-American. Yeah, it's White, it's Latino, it's Asian Pacific Islander. It is made up of those who've been told that they are not worthy of being here. It is comprised of those who are documented and undocumented.” - Stacey Abrams, 2018 

• “An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me, who are Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017 will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then on will be White European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a source of our strength.” - Joe Biden, 2015

• “The immigration proposal pending in Congress would transform the nation’s political landscape for a generation or more — pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.” - Politico, 2013


Not surprised Vivek has to resort to the usual pandering to terrified old white suburbanites for support. “See the BLACKS are coming to your neighborhood!!!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Not surprised Vivek has to resort to the usual pandering to terrified old white suburbanites for support. “See the BLACKS are coming to your neighborhood!!!”

 

Is it pandering if it's correct? 

 

Once again leftists cheer and clap like seals whenever any ethnic group that isn't northwest European or old American stock acts entirely in their own self-interest, but when someone does it for Whites it's "pandering to the terrified." 

 

And he's an Indian for *****'s sake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LeviF said:

Is it pandering if it's correct? 

 

Once again leftists cheer and clap like seals whenever any ethnic group that isn't northwest European or old American stock acts entirely in their own self-interest, but when someone does it for Whites it's "pandering to the terrified." 

 

And he's an Indian for *****'s sake. 

 

He's the brown face of white supremacy...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 🎯 

 

2024 is going to be ugly beyond anything we've seen recently, and recent history has been pretty damn ugly.

 

They're not going to let Trump anywhere near the WH....by hell or high water one way or the other they're not gonna let him...

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...