Jump to content

Should we sign Andetson or Jack?


GreggTX

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GreggTX said:

Miles Jack and Robbie Anderson could really help us if the conditions are right.

Robbie Anderson's speed must be respected and Miles Jack is a decent replacement for Edmunds.

I don't know their recent history. Are there off field issues or injury issues with either of them? Can we afford them? They'd certainly fill a couple big holes going into the draft allowing Beane to focus on the OL for a change.

Your thoughts?

Nah...  I think the WR room is already showing enough new faces and a draft might be enough to put us in great shape.  Don't want another ego in the room with certain expectations.

 

I'm not sure about Jack really, but if he's cheap, why not add a body to compete (might not make the team).

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, strive_for_five_guy said:

Anderson sucks

id sign him for the right price for one year only. hes a malcontent but very talented. his first year in CAR with Teddy B was very impressive, and he looked good on the Jets at times. I wouldnt hold too much against him for the CAR blowup, that staff was a mess last year, lockerroom had already been lost

3 hours ago, freddyjj said:

Yes degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee

dude held it together really well! at draft time they made it sound like a career ender in 5 years....... this was the Marcel Dareus draft. kudos to him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GreggTX said:

Miles Jack and Robbie Anderson could really help us if the conditions are right.

Robbie Anderson's speed must be respected and Miles Jack is a decent replacement for Edmunds.

I don't know their recent history. Are there off field issues or injury issues with either of them? Can we afford them? They'd certainly fill a couple big holes going into the draft allowing Beane to focus on the OL for a change.

Your thoughts?

Why on either? Please share your thoughts on why these guys are good fits.

 

1. Anderson: NO.  Too expensive/not a team player/we already signed 2 Fa Wrs/draft is still around the corner...want any more reasons?

 

2. Jack: go ask Steeler fans their thoughts.  Living in Pittsburgh, he didn't look good at all LY for them.  He's lost his athletic burst and is just a name at this point.  Again, the draft is a better option.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MasterStrategist said:

Why on either? Please share your thoughts on why these guys are good fits.

 

1. Anderson: NO.  Too expensive/not a team player/we already signed 2 Fa Wrs/draft is still around the corner...want any more reasons?

 

2. Jack: go ask Steeler fans their thoughts.  Living in Pittsburgh, he didn't look good at all LY for them.  He's lost his athletic burst and is just a name at this point.  Again, the draft is a better option.

Yeah I remember something about Jack being pretty much done for because of this.  Lost a huge step already.   Shame really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...