Jump to content

The Walls be Closing


Kemp

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

And down the rabbit hole I went.

On the CIA, all I could find was an anonymous whistleblower talking to a committee that has already been caught lying when their star witness directly contradicted what the committee claimed the witness said.

 

I don't know what the racist thing is about unless it's about some calling Trump racist.

As to Fauci's lying about gain-of-function, that is at best under dispute.

 

Even now, it’s not clear whether the research funded by EcoHealth in China amounted to gain of function. When the Intercept obtained EcoHealth documents in September, seven of 11 scientists who are virologists or work in adjacent fields told the Intercept that the work appeared to meet NIH’s criteria for gain-of-function research. Obviously, it’s a matter of dispute within the scientific community.


But Cotton claimed NIH admitted that it had funded gain-of-function research. That’s wrong. No such admission appears in the letter, and NIH officials continue to insist that the EcoHealth work using NIH funds did not constitute gain-of-function research.

 

Always believe the conspiracies, like windmills are killing whales.

https://x.com/covidselect/status/1706812585050276152?s=46&t=WfwBbfFkRiZZWCMxTdpkOw

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Not necessarily. It appears that discovery has shown multiple claims and filings by the Trump Org that show evidence of blatant falsehoods:

 

"In the defendantI has' world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments; restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land; restrictions can evaporate into thin air; a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party's lies..." (Page 10)

 

Imagine you bought your house for $300k. A couple years later, you want to take out a home equity loan so you call up your buddy who is an appraiser. He comes in and says that in just a few short years, your house has increased in value to $900k and you submit that appraisal to the bank to secure the loan. You should know that the appraisal is wrong. You've done no work on the house, there is no drastic change in the market and the houses in your neighborhood since then have sold in the $300k range. When submitting the loan documents, you also signed a document stating that you were personally responsible for the valuation. Even though you didn't do the appraisal yourself, there's a very strong argument that you are committing fraud.

 

Now imagine you run a real estate firm (and therefore should be an expert on valuations) and do this dozens and dozens of time over decades.

 

Relying on a single bad valuation is something that probably won't get you in much trouble. Repeatedly using clearly and obviously incorrect valuations for years and years is going to be a problem.

I haven't seen a bank that will accept an appraisal that isn't on their "approved" appraiser list. Appraisers adjust for regulated vs unregulated and real restrictions. That's their job. I still don't get it?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

I haven't seen a bank that will accept an appraisal that isn't on their "approved" appraiser list. Appraisers adjust for regulated vs unregulated and real restrictions. That's their job. I still don't get it?

 

A bank failing in due diligence is not an excuse for fraud. Repeatedly lying on loan paperwork isn't ok just because you weren't caught at the time.

 

For years, most US banks wouldn't lend to Trump, so he sought out foreign banks. The fact that he managed to sucker someone doesn't mean he's not to blame for the fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

 

I read the whole thing.

 

Summarized, they want to investigate allegations.

And that's about it.

Let them investigate and let's see if they do any better than Comer, who so far has failed miserably in his quest and whose allegations have collapsed.

If the investigation unveils what they are seeking, then it will be a whole new ballgame. Until then, it's nothing.

I understand that Trumpers are desperate to find incriminating evidence on anything they feel will help Trump because there's already a mountain of verifiable evidence against Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cassidy is yet another insider from the Trump administration who says Trump is a grave threat to the nation if he were elected again. Outside of the nuts like Rudy just about everyone who has worked in his administration says the same thing.
 

MAGA position is they are all just rinos. According to the cult rules, anyone who speaks out must be outcast.

Edited by Andy1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:

 

A bank failing in due diligence is not an excuse for fraud. Repeatedly lying on loan paperwork isn't ok just because you weren't caught at the time.

 

For years, most US banks wouldn't lend to Trump, so he sought out foreign banks. The fact that he managed to sucker someone doesn't mean he's not to blame for the fraud.

Actually a bank failing in it's policy to do due diligence is a failure to it's shareholders. Faulty appraisals is should be on the appraisers. Trump knowingly lying is fraud. Lying about values of his RE is what I'm questioning. You don't know the answer to my questions about appraisals. I don't either. I'm curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

Actually a bank failing in it's policy to do due diligence is a failure to it's shareholders. Faulty appraisals is should be on the appraisers. Trump knowingly lying is fraud. Lying about values of his RE is what I'm questioning. You don't know the answer to my questions about appraisals. I don't either. I'm curious.

 

I'm not sure what your question is, to be honest.

 

Whether or not the banks failed in their due diligence, repeatedly lying on loan applications is a crime.

 

In this case, Trump's team tried to place the blame on the appraiser but the judge felt that there was plenty of evidence that the lying was coming from the Trump Org and they were therefore liable.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem that I’ve got with the Cassidy Hudson book is if you’ve got something to say don’t wait and then do a book later get it out there whenever it could actually mean something

 

Like the whole thing with Giuliani supposedly being inappropriate touching where was this whenever it actually happened

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

I read the whole thing.

 

Summarized, they want to investigate allegations.

And that's about it.

Let them investigate and let's see if they do any better than Comer, who so far has failed miserably in his quest and whose allegations have collapsed.

If the investigation unveils what they are seeking, then it will be a whole new ballgame. Until then, it's nothing.

I understand that Trumpers are desperate to find incriminating evidence on anything they feel will help Trump because there's already a mountain of verifiable evidence against Trump.

Imagine it’s a trump Russia document and you’ll believe it wholeheartedly lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Imagine it’s a trump Russia document and you’ll believe it wholeheartedly lol

 

Thanks for admitting I summed it up correctly. 

 

Meanwhile Donnie loses another case filled with proof of his crimes.

 

The Walls Be Closing

8 hours ago, Andy1 said:

Cassidy is yet another insider from the Trump administration who says Trump is a grave threat to the nation if he were elected again. Outside of the nuts like Rudy just about everyone who has worked in his administration says the same thing.
 

MAGA position is they are all just rinos. According to the cult rules, anyone who speaks out must be outcast.

 

Sounds like Scientology. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://dnyuz.com/2023/09/27/ruling-against-trump-cuts-to-the-heart-of-his-identity/

 

fake, phony, fraud, cheat, liar, cult leader.

 

By effectively branding him a cheat, the decision in the civil proceeding by Justice Arthur F. Engoron undermined Mr. Trump’s relentlessly promoted narrative of himself as a master of the business world, the persona that he used to enmesh himself in the fabric of popular culture and that eventually give him the stature and resources to reach the White House.

The ruling was the latest remarkable development to test the resilience of Mr. Trump’s appeal as he seeks to win election again despite the weight of evidence against him in cases spanning his years as a New York developer, his 2016 campaign, his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss and his handling of national security secrets after leaving office.

The federal case accusing him of plotting to retain power despite his defeat at the polls three years ago paints him as a threat to democracy, as does a similar prosecution in Georgia. The classified documents case portrays him as willing to obstruct justice to cover up a reckless disregard for the laws that govern the handling of such documents. A New York prosecution stemming from hush-money payments to a porn star in the closing stages of the 2016 election sets out evidence of the kind of political skulduggery he professes to want to eradicate from Washington.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

If the NYT says so.

 

 

so it's the NYT 's fault he's a liar, cheat and sexual abuser and found in separate court rulings to be each of those?

 

btw, the AP agrees but you know, to MAGA's they're all the liars and trump is the second coming...

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-letitia-james-fraud-lawsuit-1569245a9284427117b8d3ba5da74249

 

Engoron found that Trump consistently overvalued Mar-a-Lago, inflating its value on one financial statement by as much as 2,300%. The judge also rebuked Trump for lying about the size of his Manhattan apartment. Trump claimed his three-story Trump Tower penthouse was nearly three times its actual size, valuing it at $327 million. 

“A discrepancy of this order of magnitude, by a real estate developer sizing up his own living space of decades, can only be considered fraud,” Engoron wrote.

On X in the wake of the ruling, Eric Trump insisted his father’s claims about Mar-a-Lago were correct, writing that the Palm Beach estate is “speculated to be worth well over a billion dollars making it arguably the most valuable residential property in the country.” He called the ruling and the lawsuit “an attempt to destroy my father and kick him out of New York.”

Under the ruling, limited liability companies that control some of Trump’s key properties, such as 40 Wall Street, will be dissolved and authority over how to run them handed over to a receiver. Trump would lose his authority over whom to hire or fire, whom to rent office space to, and other key decisions.

 

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Thanks for admitting I summed it up correctly. 

 

Meanwhile Donnie loses another case filled with proof of his crimes.

 

The Walls Be Closing

 

Sounds like Scientology. 


***** the banks. They will do anything to screw you over. 08 crisis and nobody went to jail while millions lost homes. You on their side? That’s the wrong side

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


***** the banks. They will do anything to screw you over. 08 crisis and nobody went to jail while millions lost homes. You on their side? That’s the wrong side

so the banks caused trump to be a fraud?  did you lose your home?  Did you take out a mortgage you couldn't afford?  cuz lots of foreclosures were on high risk mortgages that I agree, should not have been made by the banks.   But that doesn't absolve the borrowers and it certainly doesn't absolve trump.  When will you MAGA's learn that 2 wrongs don't make a right?  Didn't your parents teach you that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...